Abstract
Bioinformatics, merging biological data with computer science, is increasingly incorporated into school curricula at all levels. This case study of 10 secondary school students highlights student individual differences (especially the way they processed information and integrated procedural and analytical thought) and summarizes a variety of critical situations that teachers may encounter when teaching bioinformatics. Students who integrated factual information with procedural and analytical skills were closest to content mastery; while students who had fundamental deficiencies in factual recall or were less adept in integrating higher order knowledge with specific facts and procedural skills had difficulty mobilizing critical analytical skills needed to master the bioinformatics tasks. Broader implications are presented for teacher education, curriculum design, and research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Meyers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic linear alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403–410.
Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. (1993). A flow map analysis of cognitive structure in science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 953–969.
Anderson, O. R., Randle, D., & Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh-grade students. Science Education, 85, 410–425.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Biology Student Workbench. (2003). Retrieved May 18, 2005, from http://peptide.ncsa.uiuc.edu/.
Bischoff, P. J., & Anderson, O. R. (2001). Development of knowledge frameworks and higher order cognitive operations among secondary school students who studied a unit on ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35, 81–88.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bybee, R. W. (1986). Science, technology, society: 1985 Yearbook of the National Science Teachers Association. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 2–10.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33(1), 52–70.
Counsell, D. (2003). A review of bioinformatics education in the UK. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 4(1), 7–21.
Dictionary of Genetic Terms. (2006). Oakridge National Laboratory Web site: Retrieved January 14, 2006, from http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Humangenome/publicat/primer2001/glossary.shtml.
Dolan Learning Center Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. (2003). Retrieved November 22, 2005, from http://www.dnalc.org.
Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175–200). New York: Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gabric, K. M. (2003). Bioinformatics in the biology classroom. Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/gabric.html.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich College Publishers.
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2004). Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature, 431(7011), 931–945.
Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional designs, theories, and models (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kossida, S., Tahri, N., & Daizadeh, I. (2002). Bioinformatics by example: From sequence to target. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 1480–1485.
Lawson, A. E. M., McElrath, C. B., Burton, M. S., James, B. D., Doyle, R. P., Woodward, S. L., et al. (1991). Hypothetico-deductive reasoning skill and concept acquisition: Testing a constructivist hypothesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 953–970.
Lowery, M. S., & Plesniak, L. A. (2003). Some like it cold: A computer-based laboratory introduction to sequence and tertiary structure comparison of cold-adapted lactate dehydrogenases using bioinformatics tools. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1300–1302.
Maier, C. A. (2001). Building phylogenetic trees from DNA sequence data: Investigating polar bear and giant panda ancestry. The American Biology Teacher, 63, 642–646.
Merrienboer, J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2006). NCBI Education. Retrieved January 2, 2006, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Education/.
New York State District Report Card Comprehensive Information Report. (2004). Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/repcrd2004/.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, 937–947.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies (LIPHs) leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548–571.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Pious, S. (2005). Research randomizer. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://www.socialpsychology.org.
Smith, T. M., & Emmeluth, D. S. (2002). Introducing bioinformatics into the biology curriculum: Exploring the national center for biotechnology information. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 93–99.
Tsai, C.-C., & Huang, C.-M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163–169.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wefer, S. H. (2003). Name that gene: An authentic classroom activity incorporating bioinformatics. The American Biology Teacher, 65, 610–613.
West L. H. T., & Pines A. L. (Eds.). (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Zeidler, D. L. (2001). Participating in program development: Standard F. In D. S. W. McIntosh (Ed.), College pathways to the science education standards (pp. 18–22). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., & Simmons, M. L. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.
Acknowledgment
We wish to acknowledge Dr. Keith Sheppard, Dr. Angela Calabrese-Barton, Dr. Robert McClintock, and Dr. Harmen Bussemaker for their helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Wefer, S.H., Anderson, O.R. Identification of Students’ Content Mastery and Cognitive and Affective Percepts of a Bioinformatics Miniunit: A Case Study With Recommendations for Teacher Education. J Sci Teacher Educ 19, 355–373 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9099-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9099-2