Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 935–953 | Cite as

Inquiring into Teaching: Lesson Study in Elementary Science Methods

  • Stephen Marble


This article describes an innovative approach to developing preservice elementary science teachers’ classroom confidence and skills. Based on lesson study approaches, preservice candidates designed and taught integrated science–mathematics lessons during the semester before their student teaching. Working in teams, candidates designed and taught a common lesson in 3 different classrooms, critiquing and refining their lesson between each teaching activity. Data collected from observations of classroom teaching events, team reports, and individual reflections were analyzed qualitatively. Results indicate that, over the 3 teaching events, there were dramatic improvements in lesson design and delivery, the management of the learning environment, the quality of students’ engagements with meaningful content, and the quality of assessments and generation of student data.


Lesson study Elementary methods Science teaching Preservice teaching  Professional development  Learning to teach  


  1. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520–525.Google Scholar
  2. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 54–85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Lewis, C. (2000a). Can you lift 100 Kilograms? Grade 5 Komae School #7, Tokyo, Japan. [Videotape]. (Available from Catherine Lewis, Mills College, Oakland CA, Scholar
  7. Lewis, C. (2000b). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Invited address to the SIG on Research in Mathematics Education, AERA: New Orleans.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, C. C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998, Winter). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river. American Educator, 12–17, 50–52.Google Scholar
  9. Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). Inquiry, knowledge, and practice. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher education and educational reform: Ninety-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 22–51). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Potter, W. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Richardson, V. (2000). Teacher education and the construction of meaning. In G. A. Griffin (Ed.), The education of teachers: Ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 145–166). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shimahara, N. K. (2002). Teacher professional development in Japan. In G. DeCoker (Ed.), National standards and school reform in Japan and the United States (pp. 107–120). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationSouthwestern UniversityGeorgetownUSA

Personalised recommendations