Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 91–107 | Cite as

Peer Assessment of Elementary Science Teaching Skills

  • Gulsen Bagci Kilic
  • Mehtap Cakan

In this study, peer assessment was applied in assessing elementary science teaching skills. Preservice teachers taught a science topic as a team to their peers in an elementary science methods course. The peers participating in the science lesson assessed teacher-groups’ elementary science teaching skills on an assessment form provided by the instructor. The peer scores were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and linear regression. To analyze the reliability and validity of peer assessment, t-test statistics and one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) procedures were applied. The results revealed that, although peer scores were considerably higher than the instructor scores, they significantly correlated with the instructor scores. Reliability analysis revealed that the students assessed their peers’ science teaching performance reliably.


Science Teaching Preservice Teacher Teacher Education Program Science Lesson Tutorial Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies in self-assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 18, 529–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butcher, A. C., & Stefani, L. A. J. (1995). Analysis of peer-, self- and staff-assessment in group project work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 2, 165–176.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A., & Wu, M. (1993). Peer-assessment of an individual’s contribution to a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 45–54.Google Scholar
  5. Driver, R. (1995). Constructivist approaches in science teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 385–400). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Ebel, R. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289–299.Google Scholar
  8. Goldfinch, J. (1994). Further developments in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19, 29–35.Google Scholar
  9. Higher Education Council. (1998). Faculty–school collaboration. Ankara, Turkey: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Hughes, I. E., & Large, B. J. (1993). Staff and peer–group assessment of oral communication skills. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwan, K., & Leung, R. (1996). Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 205–215.Google Scholar
  12. Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). Peer-assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacAlpine, J. M. K. (1999). Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 15–25.Google Scholar
  14. Magin, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they? Studies in Higher Education, 26, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 239–251.Google Scholar
  16. Rafiq, Y., & Fullerton, H. (1996). Peer-assessment of group projects in civil engineering. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 69–82.Google Scholar
  17. Searby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 371–384.Google Scholar
  18. Sivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer-assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 7, 193–213.Google Scholar
  19. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2003). The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Moerkerke, G., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Dochy, F. J. R. G. (2001). Peer assessment in problem-based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefani, L. A. J. (1992). Comparison of collaborative self, peer, and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical. Biochemical Education, 20, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self, and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woolhouse, M. (1999). Peer assessment: The participants’ perception of two activities on a further education teacher education course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, 211–219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gulsen Bagci Kilic
    • 1
  • Mehtap Cakan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey

Personalised recommendations