Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Real-World Applications and Instructional Representations Among Prospective Elementary Science Teachers

  • Feature Article
  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Abstract

This paper explores new elementary teachers' instructional representations and how these are related to their science subject matter knowledge. One pair of prospective elementary teachers studied here exhibited a well-integrated, principled, and scientifically accurate understanding of the science they were teaching. The other pair exhibited less scientifically accurate and integrated knowledge. The pair with stronger subject matter knowledge developed instructional representations that were more scientifically and pedagogically appropriate. A perspective on one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge—knowledge of instructional representations—is presented. Real-world applications are hypothesized to play a crucial mediating role for elementary teachers. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications for elementary science teacher educators and researchers, including the importance of attending to how prospective teachers apply science knowledge to real-world situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analyzing teachers' knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34, 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (in press). Preservice elementary teachers' critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education.

  • diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.). (1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Balboa, J., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, M. (2004). Situating teacher learning in the practice of mathematics and science teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, A., & Jones, L. (1998). Engaging children in science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Models standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (1996, July). Lifelong science learning: A longitudinal case study. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Conference, San Diego, CA.

  • Linn, M. C., Eylon, B.-S., & Davis, E. A. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 29–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, and peers: Science learning partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1991). Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 885–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 193–205). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. A. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick, & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research: 1989 ASCD Yearbook (pp. 129–149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1987). NCATE standards, procedures, and policies for the accreditation of professional education units: The accreditation of professional education units for the preparation of professional school personnel at basic and advanced levels. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., Heaton, R. M., Prawat, R. S., & Remillard, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: Discussing case studies of four fifth-grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M., & Bowen, G. M. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D., & Harrison, A. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: An analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture “Atoms in Motion.” International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1157–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1993). Intermediate causal models: A missing link for science education? In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 177–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell Educational Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K. (2002). Middle school students' development of inscriptional practices in inquiry-based classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Yerrick, R., Doster, E., Nugent, J., Parke, H., & Crawley, F. (2003). Social interaction and the use of analogy: An analysis of preservice teachers' talk during physics inquiry lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching, and reflection on prospective elementary teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers' science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1259, U.S.A.

    Elizabeth A. Davis

  2. Glenbrook South High School, Glenview, IL, 60026, U.S.A.

    Debra Petish

Authors
  1. Elizabeth A. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debra Petish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Parts of this work were presented at the 2000 AERA and NARST meetings.

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, E.A., Petish, D. Real-World Applications and Instructional Representations Among Prospective Elementary Science Teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 16, 263–286 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-8892-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-8892-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation