Synthesis, characterization, photocatalytic, and antimicrobial activity of ZrO2 nanoparticles and Ag@ZrO2 nanocomposite prepared by the advanced oxidative process/hydrothermal route

Abstract

ZrO2 nanoparticles (ZrO2 NPs) and Ag@ZrO2 nanocomposite (Ag@ZrO2 NCs) were prepared from zirconium (IV) butoxide in the absence of base or acid mineraliser by the advanced oxidation processes (AOP) and subsequent hydrothermal treatment. Samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), Raman, Photoluminescence (PL), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). XRD and Raman analyses confirmed ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs tetragonal crystalline phase synthesized at 200 °C for 1 h. HRTEM images of ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs after treatment at 200 °C indicated small nanoparticles with characteristic size of 5–8 nm (ZrO2) and 40–50 nm (Ag NPs). It was found that Ag@ZrO2 NCs showed outstanding photocatalytic activity in photodegradation Rhodamine B dye compared with pure ZrO2 NPs. Antibacterial activity tests of ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs were carried out using E. coli and S. aureus as model strains of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Ag@ZrO2 NCs were capable of efficiently growth inhibition of bacteria cultures in more than 75% E. Coli compared to ZrO2 NPs that exhibited <10% instead. However, at the same concentration (for example 0.25 mg/mL) we found that both ZrO2 NPs and Ag@ZrO2 NCs were significantly more effective against S. aureus in comparison with E. coli showing bacterial growth inhibition higher than 90% for S. aureus. Morphological observation of bacterial cells by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that nanoparticles and nanocomposite caused irreversible damage to the cell membrane.

Highlights

  • Antimicrobial and catalysis properties of ZrO2 and Ag@ZrO2 were investigated by kinetic process.

  • Ag@ZrO2 nanocomposite showed 99% degradation of RhB in 60 min under 467 nm LED light irradiation.

  • Ag@ZrO2 nanocomposite showed superior antibacterial properties compared to pure ZrO2 NPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. 1.

    Xueqin L, James I, Yang W, Xun C, Yihuang C, Shiqiang Z, Zhen L, Zhiqun (2017) Noble metal−metal oxide nanohybrids with tailored nanostructures for efficient solar energy conversion, photocatalysis and environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 10:402–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Azin Z, Mirko P, Zhiya D, Reza P, Naimeh N (2019) The effect of silver oxidation on the photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO hybrid plasmonic/metal-oxide nanostructures under visible light and in the dark. Sci Rep 9:11839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Guoqiang Z, Zhao Z, Huaqiao T, Haifeng Z, Dan Q, Min Z, Weixing Y, Zaicheng S (2015) Hierarchical TiO2 spheres decorated with Au nanoparticles for visible light hydrogen production. RSC Adv 5:21237–21241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Supriya A, Ashley MP, Fuat EC, Laura L (2018) TiO2 on gold nanostars enhances photocatalytic water reduction in the near-infrared regime. Chem 4:2140–2153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jian H, Dayan M, Feng C, Dongzhen C, Min B, Kewei X, Yongxi Z (2017) Green in situ synthesis of clean 3D chestnutlike Ag/WO3-x nanostructures for highly efficient, recyclable and sensitive SERS sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:7436–7446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tanaporn N, Pornapa S (2019) Role of Ag(0) deposited on TiO2 nanoparticles for superior photocatalytic performance induced by calcination. Optic Mater 9:109407

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Trilok KP, Robin EK, Valentin C, Marcela P, Mariana CC, Hendrik CS (2019) Influence of Ag, Au and Pd noble metals doping on structural, optical and antimicrobial properties of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanomaterials. Heliyon 5:e01333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Weiwei X, Chao M, Xianghua Z, Guokang F, Junfeng L, Xiangdong M, Xiaoshuang S (2015) Nanoplate-built ZnO hollow microspheres decorated with gold nanoparticles and their enhanced photocatalytic and gas-sensing properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11824–11832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhe J, Fucong L, Zhang LC, Shanshan Z, Shun-Xing L, Li Y, Lu J (2019) Pt nanoparticles decorated heterostructured g-C3N4/Bi2MoO6 microplates with highly enhanced photocatalytic activities under visible light. Sci Rep 9:7636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shuzhan W, Shaofeng Z, Jin H, Guizhe Z, Yaqing L (2019) Attaching ZrO2 nanoparticles onto the surface of graphene oxide via electrostatic self-assembly for enhanced mechanical and tribological performance of phenolic resin composites. J Mater Sci 54:8247–8261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Saruchi R, Surbhi V, Sushil K (2017) Tailoring the structural and optical parameters of zirconia nanoparticles via silver. Appl Phys A 123:539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nicole Z, Franziska E, Tobias H, Martin P, Muhammad NT, Ute K, Wolfgang T (2013) Low temperature synthesis of monodisperse nanoscaled ZrO2 with a large specific surface area. Dalton Trans 42:432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ayodeji PA, Simon YR (2019) ZrO2−ZnO nanoparticles as antibacterial agents. ACS Omega 4:19216–19224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhanxia S, Xiuling J, Dairong C (2013) Hydrothermal synthesis and selective photocatalytic properties of tetragonal star-like ZrO2 nanostructures. CrystEngComm 15:4288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Koichi S, Hotaka U, Takaharu M, Ken W, Kengo S (2019) Oxygen adsorption on ZrO2-loaded SnO2 gas sensors in humid atmosphere. J Mater Sci 54:3135–3143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rudzani S, Mokhotjwa D, Touhami M, Fulufhelo N (2019) Preparation of a high surface area zirconium oxide for fuel cell application. Int J Mech Mater Eng 14:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dhanasekaran P, Sharon RW, Kalpana D, Santoshkumar DB (2018) Boosting efficiency and stability using zirconia nanosphere-held carbon for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. RSC Adv 8:472–480

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    John BF, Arivalagan P, Rose V (2017) Synthesis and characterization of ZrO2 nanoparticles-antimicrobial activity and their prospective role in dental care. Microbial Pathog 110:245–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rifki S, Ahmad N, Suhanda S, Lia ATWA, Maryani Eneng, Setiawan Asep Ridwan, Purwasasmita Bambang Sunendar(2019) Synthesis of one-dimensional ZrO2 nanomaterials from Zr(OH)4 precursors assisted by glycols through a facile precursor-templating method Mater Res Express 6:065037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yulei C, Chen W, Tongxiang L, Chunsong Z, Xi L, Ting G, Jianghong G, Hui W (2015) Sol–gel synthesis of mesoporous spherical zirconia. RSC Adv 5:104629–104634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yuan TF, Ahmad ZA, Bahman AH, Babak S (2019) Optimised co-precipitation synthesis condition for oxalate-derived zirconia nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 45:22930–22939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Latha K, Wenzhi L, Dezhi W (2008) Monoclinic zirconium oxide nanostructures synthesized by a hydrothermal route. Nanotechnology 19:195602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sant LJ, Stalin K, Neeraj D, Sandeep K, Jai T, Surinder PS, Renu P (2012) Antimicrobial activity of zirconia (ZrO2) nanoparticles and zirconium complexes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:7105–7112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jianqi M, Shaobo G, Xiaohua G, Hongguang G (2015) Modified photodeposition of uniform Ag nanoparticles on TiO2 with superior catalytic and antibacterial activities. J. Sol–Gel Sci Technol 75:366–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jianqi M, Shaobo G, Xiaohua G, Hongguang G (2015) ZrO2@Ag composite catalyst for hydrogenation reduction of organic dye: Preparation and characterization as well as catalytic performance evaluation. Ceram Int 41:12453–12458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Risa Y, Kosuke N, Naohiro H, Kimihiro Y, Reina N, Hiroyuki M, Akiko N (2017) Ag nanoparticle–coated zirconia for antibacterial prosthesis. Mater Sci Eng C 78:1054–1060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mehdi M, Mahmoud N, Mohammad S (2020) Facile synthesis of Ag/ZrO2 nanocomposite as a recyclable catalyst for the treatment of environmental pollutants. Composites Part B 185:107783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wang H, Cheng H, Wang F, Wei D, Wang X (2010) An improved 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction assay for evaluating the viability of Escherichia coli cells. J Microbiol Methods 82:330–333

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ali B, Ahmed AN, Fakhreia AS, Shamsun N, Mohamed IZ (2018) Controlled synthesis of ZrO2 nanoparticles with tailored size, morphology and crystal phases via organic/inorganic hybrid films. Sci Rep 8:3695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mayara SS, Jair CCF, Cleocir JD (2020) Designed single-phase ZrO2 nanocrystals obtained by solvothermal syntheses. CrystEngComm 22:1802–1811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shah AH, Manikandan E, Basheer AM, Ganesan V (2013) Enhanced bioactivity of Ag/ZnO nanorods—a comparative antibacterial study. J Nanomed Nanotechol 4:3

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shuxi D, Xingtang Z, Zuliang D, Yabin H, Hongxin D (2005) Structural properties and Raman spectroscopy of lipid Langmuir monolayers at the air–water interface. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 42:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Alexis L, Victoire A, Gabriel BA, Mylan L, Michèle S, Souhir B (2019) Silver-based plasmonic nanoparticles for and their use in biosensing. Biosensors 9:78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Manish K, Suchand Sandeep CS, Kumar G, Mishra YK, Philip R, Reddy GB (2014) Plasmonic and nonlinear optical absorption properties of Ag:ZrO2 nanocomposite thin films. Plasmonics 9:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    William WA, Samuel OBO, Sudheesh KS, Eric SA, Poomani PG (2016) Cobalt doped ZrO2 decorated multiwalled carbon nanotube: a promising nanocatalyst for photodegradation of indigo carmine and eosin Y dyes. Prog Nat Sci 26:354–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gowri S, Rajiv GR, Sundrarajan M (2014) Structural, optical, antibacterial and antifungal properties of zirconia nanoparticles by biobased protocol. J Mater Sci Technol 30:782–790

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yongfeng Z, Pei L, De Z, Lisha T, Qianmin D, Shangzhong J, Dejiang N, Zhi Y, Jiaming Y (2020) A facile seed growth method to prepare stable Ag@ZrO2 core-shell SERS substrate with high stability in extreme environments. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 5:117676

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tryba B, Piszcz M, Morawski AW (2010) Photocatalytic and self-cleaning properties of Ag-doped TiO2. Open Mater Sci J 4:5–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Xianglin Z, Xizhuang L, Peng W, Ying D, Baibiao H (2018) Porous Ag-ZnO microspheres as efficient photocatalyst for methane and ethylene oxidation: Insight into the role of Ag particles. Appl Surf Sci 456:493–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bashirom N, Tan WK, Kawamura G, Matsuda A, Lockman Z (2020) Comparison of ZrO2, TiO2, and α-Fe2O3 nanotube arrays on Cr(VI) photoreduction fabricated by anodization of Zr, Ti, and Fe foils. Mater Res Express 7:055013

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang T, Lang J, Zhao Y, Su Y, Zhao Y, Wang X (2015) Simultaneous doping and heterojunction of silver on Na2Ta2O6 nanoparticles for visible light driven photocatalysis: the relationship between tunable optical absorption, defect chemistry and photocatalytic activity. CrystEngComm 17:6651–6660

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang H, Liu X, Han S (2016) The synthesis of a Ag–ZnO nanohybrid with plasmonic photocatalytic activity under visible-light irradiation: the relationship between tunable optical absorption, defect chemistry and photocatalytic activity. CrystEngComm 18:1933–1943

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bu Y, Chen Z, Sun C (2015) Highly efficient Z-Scheme Ag3PO4/Ag/WO3−x photocatalyst for its enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B 179:363–371

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chiu YH, Chang TFM, Chen CY, Sone M, Hsu YJ (2019) Mechanistic insights into photodegradation of organic dyes using heterostructure photocatalysts. Catalysts 9:430

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dhanalekshmi KI, Meena KS (2016) DNA intercalation studies and antimicrobial activity of Ag@ZrO2 core–shell nanoparticles in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C 59:1063–1068

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Thakare VG, Joshi PA, Godse RR, Bhatkar VB, Wadegaokar PA, Omanwar SK (2016) Evaluation of biological activities of nanocrystalline tetragonal zirconia synthesized via sol-gel method. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 8:125–131

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Joseph AHR, Lynette C (2015) Bacterial cell wall composition and the influence of antibiotics by cell-wall and whole-cell NMR. Phil Trans R Soc B 370:20150024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Andrea VD, Rafael AA, Andrea MC, Ángel RV, Younes S (2020) Antibacterial activity of colloidal silver against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Antibiotics 9:36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yun’an Q, Lin C, Ruiyan L, Guancong L, Yanbo Z, Xiongfeng T, Jincheng W, He L, Yanguo Q (2018) Potential antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and the optimization of orthopedic implants by advanced modification technologies. Int J Nanomed 13:3311–3327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tamboli DP, Lee DS (2013) Mechanistic antimicrobial approach of extracellularly synthesized silver nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. J Hazard Mater 260:878–884

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Guzman M, Dille J, Godet S(2012) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med 8:37–45

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Manoranjan A, Mohammed S, Bairagi CM, Suman J (2015) The effects of interfacial potential on antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle. Sci Rep 5:9578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fengming Z, Hongjian Z, Do YJ, Junyoung K, Seong UE, Tae JP, Suck WH, Jaebeom L (2017) Wrinkled surface-mediated antibacterial activity of graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:1343–1351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sangiliyandi G, Jae WH, Deug-Nam K, Jin-Hoy K (2014) Enhanced antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of silver nanoparticles against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Salabat A, Mirhoseini F, Arjomandzadegan M, Jiryaei E (2017) A novel methodology for fabrication of Ag–polypyrrole core–shell nanosphere using microemulsion system and evaluation of its antibacterial application. N J Chem 41:12892–12900

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Anupam R, Onur B, Sudip S, Amit KM, Deniz YM (2019) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: biomolecule-nanoparticle organizations targeting antimicrobial activity. RSC Adv 9:2673–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Carlos AHA, Adriana BPJ, Antonio RS, Navneet K, Pandiyan T, Jorge MVR, Narinder S (2015) Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoparticles for bacterial inhibition: synthesis and characterization of doped and undoped ONPs with Ag/Au NPs. Molecules 20:6002–6021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yael NS, Jason A, Urs OH, Horacio B (2017) Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnol 15:65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wang J, Hu C, Shao L (2017) The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomed 12:1227–1249

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Baranwal A, Srivastava A, Kumar P, Bajpai VK, Maurya PK, Chandra P (2018) Prospects of nanostructure materials and their composites as antimicrobial agents. Front Microbiol 9:422

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Brazilian agencies FAPESP and CNPq. In particular, we would like to acknowledge CEPID/CMDMC/CDMF/INCTMN, FAPESP processes no. 11/20536-7, 12/14106-2, and 13/07296-2, and CNPq process no. 470147/2012-1.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. M. Pontes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nova, C.V., Reis, K.A., Pinheiro, A.L. et al. Synthesis, characterization, photocatalytic, and antimicrobial activity of ZrO2 nanoparticles and Ag@ZrO2 nanocomposite prepared by the advanced oxidative process/hydrothermal route. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-021-05488-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nanocomposite
  • Nanoparticles
  • Hydrothermal route
  • ZrO2
  • Ag