Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preparation and characterization of boron-based bioglass by sol−gel process

  • Original Paper: Sol–gel and hybrid materials for biological and health (medical) applications
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

45S5 bioglass has been widely studied in the last few decades because of its bioactivity and promising applications in the biomedical field. Boron, even few studied, represents a potential element to improve the properties of the 45S5 bioglass derivatives. The bioglasses are conventionally prepared by heat treatment of oxides and silicon. Here, the sol−gel method is proposed for the preparation of the boron-based 45S5 bioglass (45S5B) and the classical 45S5 bioglass (45S5), using water-soluble salts as raw materials. The bioglasses were characterized by FTIR, XRD, and SEM, indicating the success of the sol−gel method for preparation of the samples. The bioglasses were also tested in vitro for bioactivity in biological conditions and cytotoxicity against eukaryotic cells. The bioactivity of 45S5B was similar to the bioactivity of 45S5 bioglass, indicated by the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals at the surface of the pristine bioglasses. The results of cytotoxicity tests revealed that the IC50 of 45S5B (IC50 = 7.56 mg mL−1) was similar to the IC50 of 45S5 (IC50 = 8.15 mg mL−1), indicating its safety for application in the biomedical field.

Highlights

  • The sol−gel process was used to prepare boron-based bioglass from water-soluble salts.

  • The bioactivity of the boron-based bioglass was similar to the conventional bioglass.

  • The boron-based bioglass and 45S5 bioglass showed high in vitro bioactivity.

  • The boron-based bioglass was not cytotoxic against OSTEO-1 eukaryotic cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farr JN, Khosla S (2015) Skeletal changes through the lifespan—from growth to senescence. Nat Rev Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheikh Z, Hamdan N, Ikeda Y, Grynpas M, Ganss B, Glogauer M (2017) Natural graft tissues and synthetic biomaterials for periodontal and alveolar bone reconstructive applications: a review Biomater Res 21:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Habraken W, Habibovic P, Epple M, Bohner M (2016) Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: materials for the future? Mater Today 19:69–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lanza RP, Langer RS, Vacanti J (eds) In Principles of tissue engineering (2014), Elsevier, San Diego, CA.

  5. Rodella LF, Favero G, Labanca M (2011) Biomaterials in maxillofacial surgery: Membranes and grafts. Int J Biomed Sci 7:81–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wenz B, Oesch B, Horst M (2001) Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. Biomaterials 22:1599–1606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Šupová M (2015) Substituted hydroxyapatites for biomedical applications: a review. Ceram Int 41:9203–9231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 5:117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hench LL (2006) The story of Bioglass®. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 17:967–978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shankhwar N, Srinivasan A (2016) Evaluation of sol−gel based magnetic 45S5 bioglass and bioglass-ceramics containing iron oxide. Mater Sci Eng C 62:190–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soubelet CG, Albano MP, Conconi MS (2018) Sintering, microstructure and hardness of Y-TZP- 64S bioglass ceramics. Ceram Int 44:4868–4874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pazarçeviren AE, Tahmasebifar A, Tezcaner A, Keskin D, Evis Z (2018) Investigation of bismuth doped bioglass/graphene oxide nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 44:3791–3799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vassilakopoulou A, Dimos K, Kostas V, Karakassides MA, Koutselas I (2016) Synthesis and characterization of calcium oxyboroapatite with bimodal porosity. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 78:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M (2003) Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 24:2161–2175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucacel Ciceo R, Trandafir DL, Radu T, Ponta O, Simon V (2014) Synthesis, characterisation and in vitro evaluation of sol-gel derived SiO2-P2O5-CaO-B2O3 bioactive system. Ceram Int 40:9517–9524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu Q, Rahaman MN, Fu H, Liu X (2010) Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. J Biomed Mater Res—Part A 95:164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hassan EA, Hassan ML, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated from xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43:76–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang X, Zhang L, Chen X, Sun X, Yang G, Guo X, Yang H, Gao C, Gou Z (2012) Incorporation of B2O3in CaO-SiO2-P2O5 bioactive glass system for improving strength of low-temperature co-fired porous glass ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 358:1171–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu H, Fu Q, Zhou N, Huang W, Rahaman MN, Wang D, Liu X (2009) In vitro evaluation of borate-based bioactive glass scaffolds prepared by a polymer foam replication method. Mater Sci Eng C 29:2275–2281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bi L, Rahaman MN, Day DE, Brown Z, Samujh C, Liu X, Mohammadkhah A, Dusevich V, Eick JD, Bonewald LF (2013) Effect of bioactive borate glass microstructure on bone regeneration, angiogenesis, and hydroxyapatite conversion in a rat calvarial defect model. Acta Biomater 9:8015–8026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin Y, Brown RF, Jung SB, Day DE (2014) Angiogenic effects of borate glass microfibers in a rodent model. J Biomed Mater Res—Part A 102:4491–4499

    Google Scholar 

  22. Deliormanli AM (2013) Size-dependent degradation and bioactivity of borate bioactive glass. Ceram Int 39:8087–8095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haro Durand LA, Vargas GE, Romero NM, Vera-Mesones R, Porto-López JM, Boccaccini AR, Zago MP, Baldi A, Gorustovich A (2015) Angiogenic effects of ionic dissolution products released from a boron-doped 45S5 bioactive glass. J Mater Chem B 3:1142–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah FA, Czechowska J (2018) 9—Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In: Bioactive glasses, pp 201–233. Ed. Heimo Ylänen. Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier, second edition, Kidlington, UK, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100936-9.00011-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Balasubramanian P, Grünewald A, Detsch R, Hupa L, Jokic B, Tallia F, Solanki AK, Jones JR, Boccaccini AR (2016) Ion release, hydroxyapatite conversion, and cytotoxicity of boron-containing bioactive glass scaffolds. Int J Appl Glas Sci 7:206–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li R, Clark AE, Hench LL (1991) An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. J Appl Biomater 2:231–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pirayesh H, Nychka JA (2013) Sol-gel synthesis of bioactive glass-ceramic 45S5 and its in vitro dissolution and mineralization behavior. J Am Ceram Soc 96:1643–1650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamitsos EI (2003) Infrared studies of borate glasses. Phys Chem Glas—Eur J Glas Sci Technol Part B 44:79–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamitsos EI, Patsis AP, Karakassides MA, Chryssikos GD (1990) Infrared reflectance spectra of lithium borate glasses. J Non Cryst Solids 126:52–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ouis MA, Abdelghany AM, ElBatal HA (2012) Corrosion mechanism and bioactivity of borate glasses analogue to Hench’s bioglass. Process Appl Ceram 6:141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pham TTT, Nguyen TP, Pham TN, Vu TP, Tran DL, Thai H, Dinh TMT (2013) Impact of physical and chemical parameters on the hydroxyapatite nanopowder synthesized by chemical precipitation method Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kültz D, Chakravarty D (2001) Hyperosmolality in the form of elevated NaCl but not urea causes DNA damage in murine kidney cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1999–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Capes for RGF doctoral fellowship, Fundação Nacional de Desenvolvimento do Ensino Superior Particular (FUNADESP), and University of Araraquara (UNIARA) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliane Trovatti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furlan, R.G., Correr, W.R., Russi, A.F.C. et al. Preparation and characterization of boron-based bioglass by sol−gel process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 88, 181–191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4806-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4806-8

Keywords

Navigation