Natural clay attapulgite as the raw material for synthesis of Al/Ti/Mg-containing mesoporous silicates with cubic, 3D hexagonal, and lamellar mesostructures

Original Paper: Nano-structured materials (particles, fibers, colloids, composites, etc.)
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

A series of Al/Ti/Mg-containing ordered mesostructured silicates were synthesized using the natural attapulgite clay as the raw material, which was first pretreated by 4 M hydrochloric acid without other special treatment such as grinding. By varying the pH value in the synthetic gel, different mesophases with cubic, 3D hexagonal, and lamellar mesostructures were obtained. Their mesostructures were confirmed by low-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Their morphology and textural properties were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and N2 adsorption. It was found that the hetero-atoms including Al, Ti, and Mg in the clay could be effectively transformed into these ordered mesostructured silicate frameworks in sufficient content, as revealed by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy and fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum. NH3-TPD showed the accessibility of Al species as Brönsted and Lewis acid sites in the mesostructured framework located on the pore surface. All above suggests the potential of attapulgite as a low-cost precursor for the industrial scale production of high quality heteroatom-doped mesophases for various applications. Low-angle powder X-ray diffraction patterns of mesostructured silicates with cubic, 3D hexagonal, and lamellar mesophases, synthesized by using natural clay attapulgite as raw material: uncalcined (left) and calcined (right).

Keywords

Attapulgite Cubic silicates Hexagonal silicates Lamellar silicates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21503041).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhou L, Liu X, Sun Y, Li J, Zhou Y (2005) Methane sorption in ordered mesoporous silica SBA-15 in the presence of water. J Phys Chem B 109:22710–22714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar D, Schumacher K, Hohenesche CDF, Grun M, Unger KK (2001) MCM-41, MCM-48 and related mesoporous adsorbents: their synthesis and characterization. Colloids Surf A 187:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CTW, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Huggins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee JW, Cho DL, Shim WG, Moon H (2004) Application of mesoporous MCM-48 and SBA-15 materials for the separation of biochemicals dissolved in aqueous solution. Kor J Chem Eng 21:246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poh NE, Nur H, Nazlan M, Muhid M, Hamdan H (2006) Sulphated AlMCM-41: mesoporous solid Brønsted acid catalyst for dibenzoylation of biphenyl. Catal Today 114:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Selvaraj M, Seshadri KS, Pandurangan A, Lee TG (2005) Highly selective synthesis of trans-stilbene oxide over mesoporous Mn-MCM-41 and Zr–Mn-MCM-41 molecular sieves. Micro Mesopor Mat 79:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fricke R, Kosslick H, Lischke G, Richter M (2000) Incorporation of gallium into zeolites: syntheses, properties and catalytic application. Chem Rev 100:2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kosslick H, Lischke G, Landmesser H, Parlitz B, Storek W, Fricke R (1998) Acidity and catalytic behavior of substituted MCM-48. J Catal 176:102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sakthivel A, Badamali SK, Selvam P (2000) para-Selective t-butylation of phenol over mesoporous H-AlMCM-41. Micro Mesopor Mat 39:457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morey MS, O’Brien S, Schwarz S, Stucky GD (2000) Hydrothermal and postsynthesis surface modification of cubic MCM-48, and ultralarge pore SBA-15 mesoporous silica with titanium. Chem Mater 12:898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pu SB, Kim JB, Seno M, Inui MT (1997) Isopropylation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons on Al-containing M41S mesoporous catalysts. Micro Mater 10:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iwanami K, Sakakura T, Yasuda H (2009) Efficient catalysis of mesoporous Al-MCM-41 for mukaiyama aldol reactions. Catal Commun 10:1990–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi JS, Yoon SS, Jang SH, Ahn WS (2006) Phenol hydroxylation using Fe-MCM-41 catalysts. Catal Today 111:280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preethi MEL, Revathi S, Sivakumar T, Manikandan D, Divakar D, Rupa AV, Palanichami M (2008) Phenol hydroxylation using Fe/Al-MCM-41 catalysts. Catal Lett 120:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu H, Lu GZ, Guo YL, Guo Y, Wang JS (2006) Synthesis of framework-substituted Fe-HMS and its catalytic performance for phenol hydroxylation. Nanotechnology 17:997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Timofeeva MN, Malyshev ME, Panchenko VN, Shmakov AN, Potapov AG, Mel’gunov MS (2010) FeAl12-Keggin type cation as an active site source for Fe,Al-silica mesoporous catalysts. Appl Catal B: Environ 95:110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vinu A, Ariga K, Saravanamurugan S, Hartmann M, Murugesan V (2004) Synthesis of highly acidic and well ordered MgAl-MCM-41 and its catalytic performance on the isopropylation of m-cresol. Micro Mesopor Mat 76:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jang HT, Park YK, Ko YS, Lee JY, Margandan B (2009) Highly siliceous MCM-48 from rice husk ash for CO2 adsorption. Int J Greenh Gas Con 3:545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar P, Mal N, Oumi Y, Yamana K, Sano T (2001) Mesoporous materials prepared using coal fly ash as the silicon and aluminium source. J Mater Chem 11:3285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Y, Pinnavaia TJ (2004) Metakaolin as a reagent for the assembly of mesoporous aluminosilicates with hexagonal, cubic and wormhole framework structures from proto-faujasitic nanoclusters. J Mater Chem 14:3416–3420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang H, Tang D, Ouyang J, Li M, Mann S (2010) From natural attapulgite to mesoporous materials: methodology, characterization and structural evolution. J Phys Chem B 114:2390–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eberl DD, Velde B, McCormick T (1993) Synthesis of illite-smectite from smectite at earth surface temperatures and high pH. Clay Miner 28:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rassineus F, Griffault L, Mcunier A, Berger G, Petit S, Vieillard P, Zellagui R, Munoz M (2001) Expandability-layer stacking relationship during experimental alteration of a Wyoming bentonite in pH 13.5 solutions at 35 and 60 °C. Clay Miner 36:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim JM, Stucky GD (2000) Synthesis of highly ordered mesoporous silica materials using sodium silicate and amphiphilic block copolymers. Chem Commun 1159.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christiansen SC, Zhao DY, Janicke MT, Landry CC, Stucky GD, Chmelka BF (2001) Molecularly ordered inorganic frameworks in layered silicate surfactant mesophases. J Am Chem Soc 123:4519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang LQ, Exarhos GJ (2003) Investigation of local molecular ordering in layered surfactant-silicate mesophase composites. J Phys Chem B 107:443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schumacher K, von Hohenesche CD, Unger KK, Ulrich R, Chesne AD, Wiesner U, Spiess HW (1999) The synthesis of spherical mesoporous molecular sieves MCM-48 with heteroatoms incorporated into the silica framework. Adv Mater 11:1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmidt R, Stöcker M, Akporiaye D, Torstad EH, Olsen A (1995) High-resolution electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction studies of MCM-48. Micro Mater 5:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yuan ZY, Luo Q, Liu JQ, Chen TH, Wang JZ, Li HX (2001) Synthesis and characterization of boron-containing MCM-48 cubic mesoporous molecular sieves. Micro Mesopor Mat 42:289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang KX, Lin YJ, Morrisa MA, Holmes JD (2006) Preparation of MCM-48 materials with enhanced hydrothermal stability. J Mater Chem 16:4051–4057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Endud S, Wong K (2007) Mesoporous silica MCM-48 molecular sieve modified with SnCl2 in alkaline medium for selective oxidation of alcohol. Micro Mesopor Mat 101:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jin ZW, Wang XD, Cui XG (2007) Acidity-dependent mesostructure transformation of highly ordered mesoporous silica materials during a two-step synthesis. J Non-Cryst Solids 353:2507–2514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boissière C, Larbot A, Van der Lee A, Kooyman PJ, Prouzet E (2000) A new synthesis of mesoporous MSU-X silica controlled by a two-step pathway. Chem Mat 12:2902–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kruk M, Jaroniec M, Pena ML, Rey F (2002) Determination of phase composition of MCM-48/Lamellar phase mixtures using nitrogen adsorption and thermogravimetry. Chem Mater 14:4434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hou Q, Margolese D, Stucky GD (1996) Surfactant control of phases in the synthesis of mesoporous silica-based materials. Chem Mater 8:1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ryoo R, Ko CH, Howe RF (1997) Imaging the distribution of framework aluminum in mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41. Chem Mater 9:1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ricchiardi G, Damin A, Bordiga S, Lamberti C, Spano G, Rivetti F, Zecchina A (2001) Vibrational structure of titanium silicate catalysts. A spectroscopic and theoretical study. J Am Chem Soc 123:11409–11419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shao YF, Wang LZ, Zhang JL, Anpo M (2005) Synthesis of hydrothermally stable and long-range ordered Ce-MCM-48 and Fe-MCM-48 materials. J Phys Chem B 109:20835–20841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Igarashi N, Hashimoto K, Tatsumi T (2007) Catalytical studies on trimethylsilylated Ti-MCM-41 and Ti-MCM-48 materials. Micro Mesopor Mat 104:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dapurkar SE, Selvam P (2003) Mesoporous H-AlMCM-48: highly efficient solid acid catalyst. Appl Catal A-Gen 254:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment and Civil EngineeringDongguan University of TechnologyDongguanChina
  2. 2.Institute of New Catalytic Materials Science, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of ChemistryNankai UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations