Advertisement

Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 369–374 | Cite as

Time growing comparison for ZnO nanorod by using microwave irradiation method

  • Izzati Husna Ismail
  • Kamarulazizi Ibrahim
  • Melati Khairuddean
  • Tho Seiw Yen
  • Yeap Choon Wan
Original Paper

Abstract

In this study, zinc oxide (ZnO) nanorod were successfully prepared at different growth times (15, 30 and 60 min) using the microwave irradiation method. The ZnO nanorods were simply synthesized at a low temperature (90 °C) with low power microwave assisted heating (about 100 W) and a subsequent ageing process. The synthesized nanorod were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and Ultraviolet–Visible spectroscopy (UV–Vis). The FESEM images showed nanorods with diameter ranging between 50 and 150 nm, and length of 150–550 nm. The XRD results indicate that ZnO nanorods of different time of growth exhibits pure wurtzite structure with lattice parameters of 3.2568 and 5.2125 Å. UV–Vis characterization showed that energy gap decreases with increase in time. The result also shows that growth of ZnO at 60 min produces an energy band gap of 3.15 eV. In general, the results of the study confirm that the microwave irradiation method is a promising low temperature, cheap and fast method for the production of ZnO nanostructures.

Keywords

ZnO nanorod XRD FESEM EDX UV–VIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the Research University Grant (RU1001/PKIMIA/811129) provided by Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). NJ is thankful to TWAS and USM for providing TWAS-USM PG fellowship. Thankful to all, that in charge NORLab, School of Phyiscs USM and Chemistry laboratory, School of Chemistries USM for good facilities and encouragement.

References

  1. 1.
    Morales AM, Lieber CM (1998) A laser ablation method for the synthesis of crystalline semiconductor nanowires. Science 279:208–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao BB (2000) Zinc oxide ceramic semi-conductor gas sensor for ethanol vapour. Mater Chem Phys 64:62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horsthuis WHG (1986) ZnO processing for integrated optic sensors. Thin Sold Film 137:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asif MH, Nur O et al (2009) Selective calcium ion detection with functionalized ZnO nanorods-extended gate MOSFET. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3379–3382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xia C, Wang N et al (2008) Synthesis and characterization of waxberry-like microstructures ZnO for biosensors. Sens Actuators B 129:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krishnamoorthy S, Iliadis AA (2006) Development of high frequency ZnO/SiO2/Si Love mode surface acoustic wave devices. Solid State Electron 50:1113–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wakatsuki K, Mu R et al (2009) Fabrication and characterization of ZnO film based UV photodetector. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 20:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang Y, Li M (2006) Hydrothermal synthesis of single-crystalline hexagonal prism ZnO nanorods. Mater Lett 60:266–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee J, Easteal AJ et al (2009) Evolution of ZnO nanostructures in sol–gel synthesis. Curr Appl Phys 9:792–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang XH, Liu S et al (2007) Synthesis of sulfur-doped ZnO nanowires by electrochemical deposition. Mater Sci Semicond Process 10:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park J-H, Choi Y-J et al (2005) Synthesis of ZnO nanowires and nanosheets by an O2-assisted carbothermal reduction process. J Cryst Growth 280:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu XL, Zhu YJ et al (2004) Sonochemical and microwave-assisted synthesis of linked single-crystalline ZnO rods. Mater Chem Phys 88:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Komarneri S, Bruno M, Mariani E (2000) Synthesis of ZnO with and without microwaves. Mater Res Bull 35:1843–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shibata C, Kashima T, Ohuchi K (1996) Nonthermal influence of microwave power on chemical reactions. Jpn J Appl Phys 35(1):316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu B, Zeng H (2004) Room temperature solution synthesis of monodispersed single-crystalline ZnO nanorods and derived hierarchical nanostructures. Langmuir 20:4196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahuja IS, Yadava CL, Singh R (1982) Structural information on manganese(II), cobalt(II), nickel(II), zinc(II) and cadmium (II) sulphate complexes with hexamethylenetetramine (a potentially tetradentate ligand) from their magnetic moments, electronic and infrared spectra. J Mol Struct 81:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baruah S, Dutta J (2009) Hydrothermal growth of ZnO nanostructures. Sci Technol Adv Mater 10:013001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiou WT, Wu WY, Ting JM (2003) Growth of single crystal ZnO nanowires using sputter deposition. Diam Relat Mater 12:1841–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Unalan HE, Hiralal P, Rupesinghe N, Dalal S, Milne WI, Amaratunga GAJ (2008) Rapid synthesis of aligned zinc oxide nanowires. Nanotechnology 19:255608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Izzati Husna Ismail
    • 1
  • Kamarulazizi Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Melati Khairuddean
    • 2
  • Tho Seiw Yen
    • 1
  • Yeap Choon Wan
    • 2
  1. 1.Nano-Optoelectronics Research and Technology Laboratory, School of PhysicsUniversiti Sains Malaysia (USM)PenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of ChemistryUniversiti Sains Malaysia (USM)PenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations