Optimization of process variables and corrosion properties of a multi layer silica sol gel coating on AZ91D using the Box–Behnken design

  • Bahaedin Nikrooz
  • Morteza Zandrahimi
Original Paper


Anti-corrosion silica coating was prepared via the sol–gel method for AZ91D magnesium alloy using tetraethoxysilane and methyltriethoxysilane as precursors. Silica coating was deposited on fluorinated magnesium alloy substrates by dip coating. The surface morphology of the silica coating was characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The corrosion properties were studied by electrochemical impedance measurements and polarisation technique in 3.5 wt% Sodium chloride solution. The results showed an improvement in the corrosion performance from these coatings. A three-factor, three-level design of experiment (DOE) with response surface methodology including a Box–Behnken design was run to evaluate the main and interaction effects of several independent formulation variables, which included precursor ratios MTES/TEOS (X1), sintering temperature (X3) and sol dilution (X2) which measured the volume of the diluted sol divided by the initial volume of sol. The dependent variables included the corrosion current derived from the polarisation curve (icor = Y1) and the coating resistance derived from the Nyquist curve (Rcoat = Y2). Optimizations were predicted to yield Y1 and Y2 values of 1.57018E–7A cm−2 and 14279 Ω cm2, when X1, X2, and X3 were 3.36, 1.52 and 222, respectively.


Box–Behnken design Silica coating AZ91D MTES TEOS Sintering temperature 


  1. 1.
    Lamakaa SV, Montemorc MF, Galio AF, Zheludkevich ML, Trindade C, Dick LF, Ferreira MGS (2008) Electrochim Acta 53:4773–4783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Q, Zhong X, Hu J, Kang W (2008) Prog Org Coat 63:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tamar Y, Mandler D (2008) Electrochim. Acta 53:5118–5127Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khramov AN, Balbyshev VN, Kasten LS, Mantz RA (2006) Thin Solid Films 514:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feil F, Fürbeth W, Schütze M (2008) Electrochim. Acta 54:91Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khramov AN, Johnson JA (2009) Prog Org Coat 64:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bierwagen GP et al (2009) Prog Org Coat 64:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez C et al (2011) Chem Soc Rev 40(2):696–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandao GC, da Silva EGP, Portugal LA, dos Reis PS, Souza AS, dos Santos WNL (2007) Anal Chim Acta 597:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kozuka H (2006) J Sol Gel Sci Technol 40:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Castro Y, Ferrari B, Moreno R, Duran A (2004) Surf Coat Technol 182:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Q, Chen B, Xu S, Gao H, Zhang L, Liu C (2009) J Alloy Comp 478:544CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Faculty of EngineeringShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran

Personalised recommendations