Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 314, Issue 2, pp 871–877 | Cite as

Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes as indicators of habitat selection by cultured and natural fish preferences: a case study of ayu

  • Wei Huang
  • Xixi Chen
  • Xiaobo Liu
  • Shinichiro Yano


Reliable indicators on whether natural and cultured fish exhibit differences in habitat preferences are lacking. In this study, δ13C and δ15N were used to distinguish the habitat preferences of cultured versus natural ayu and their prey (periphyton) in a typical riffle-pool river reach. It found that the δ13C of natural ayu (−13.747‰) was consistent with that of periphyton in riffles (−14.611‰), while the δ13C of cultured ayu (−19.088‰) was consistent with that of periphyton (−19.711‰) in pools. The results indicated that cultured ayu appear to favor pools whereas natural ayu favor riffles, and δ13C and δ15N represent potential reliable indicators of habitat preferences of cultured ayu.


Stable isotopes Habitat preferences Cultured fish Periphyton Fish habitat 



The authors are extremely grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. Financial support was partly provided by the National Key Project  R & D of China (2016YFC0401709), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51309253, 51479219), the Special Scientific Fund sponsored by the Chinese Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (Grant No. WE0145B782017, HJ1633), and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering.


  1. 1.
    Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308(5720):405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor MD, Chick RC, Kai L, Agnalt AL, Leber KM, Blankenship HL, Haegen GV, Loneragan NR (2016) Fisheries enhancement and restoration in a changing world. Fish Res 105:237–243Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorenzen K, Leber KM, Blankenship HL (2010) Responsible approach to marine stock enhancement: an update. Rev Fish Sci 18(2):189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lorenzen K (2014) Understanding and managing enhancements: why fisheries scientists should care. J Fish Biol 85(6):1807–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ullah I, Zuberi A, Khan KU, Ahmad S, Thörnqvist PO, Winberg S (2017) Effects of enrichment on the development of behaviour in an endangered fish mahseer (Tor putitora). Appl Anim Behav Sci 186:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonsson B, Jonsson N, Hansen LP (1991) Differences in life history and migratory behaviour between wild and hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon in nature. Aquaculture 98(1–3):69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heggberget TG, Ugedal O (1996) Prespawning migratory behaviour of wild and farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in a north Norwegian river. Aquac Res 27(5):313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orlov AV, Gerasimov YV, Lapshin OM (2006) The feeding behaviour of cultured and wild Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in the Louvenga River, Kola Peninsula, Russia. ICES J Mar Sci 63(7):1297–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu J, Zhang M (2012) Primary consumers as bioindicator of nitrogen pollution in lake planktonic and benthic food webs. Ecol Indic 14(1):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hart LM, Bond MH, May-Mcnally SL, Miller JA, Quinn TP (2015) Use of otolith microchemistry and stable isotopes to investigate the ecology and anadromous migrations of Northern Dolly Varden from the Egegik River, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Environ Biol Fish 98(6):1633–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li L, Wei QW, Wu JM, Zhang H, Liu Y, Xie X (2015) Diet of Leptobotia elongata revealed by stomach content analysis and inferred from stable isotope signatures. Environ Biol Fish 98(8):1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hershey AE, Northington RM, Finlay JC, Peterson BJ (2017) Stable isotopes in stream food webs. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoefs J (2008) Stable isotope geochemistry. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin GH (2013) Stable isotope ecology. Higher Education Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lajtha K, Michener RH (2010) Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science. Freshw Biol 54(2):434–435Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, Macleod H (2004) Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J Anim Ecol 73(5):1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang CK, Choy EJ, Son Y, Lee JY, Kim JK, Kim Y, Lee KS (2008) Food web structure of a restored macroalgal bed in the eastern Korean peninsula determined by C and N stable isotope analyses. Mar Biol 153(6):1181–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pingram MA, Collier KJ, Hamilton DP, David BO, Hicks BJ (2014) Carbon sources supporting large river food webs: a review of ecological theories and evidence from stable isotopes. Freshw Rev 5:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83(83):703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trudeau V, Rasmussen JB (2003) The effect of water velocity on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures of periphyton. Limnol Oceanogr 48(6):2194–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Radabaugh KR, Wallace AA, Huelster SA, Hollander DJ, Peebles EB (2011) Comparison of vertebral δ13C and δ15N records with organism-based isoscapes to identify fish migration, site fidelity and food-web preferences of fishes in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, USA. AGU Fall Meeting AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martine PJ, Johnson BM, Hobgood JD (2001) Stable isotope signatures of native and nonnative fishes in Upper Colorado River backwaters and ponds. Southwest Nat 46(3):311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fry B (2002) Stable isotopic indicators of habitat use by Mississippi River fish. Freshw SCI 21(4):676Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoffman JC, Bronk DA, Olney JE (2007) Tracking nursery habitat use in the York River estuary, Virginia, by young American shad using stable isotopes. Trans Am Fish Soc 136(5):1285–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katano O, Uchida K, Yoshimasa A (2004) Experimental analysis of the territorial establishment of ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis. Ecol Res 19(4):433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iguchi KI, Abe SI (2002) Territorial defense of an excess food supply by an algal grazing fish, ayu. Ecol Res 17(3):373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Awata S, Tsuruta T, Abe S, Tamaki Y, Iguchi KI (2012) Feeding territory and variations in behavioural modes of algae-grazing fish Plecoglossus altivelis ryukyuensis (Ryukyu-ayu) in subtropical island streams. Ecol Freshw Fish 21(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fry B (2006) Stable isotope ecology. Springer, New York, pp 204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vander ZMJ, Rasmussen JB (2001) Variation in δ13C and δ15N trophic fractionation: implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr 46(8):2061–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Middelburg JJ (2014) Stable isotopes dissect aquatic food webs from the top to the bottom. Biogeosciences 11(8):2357–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cabana G, Rasmussen JB (1994) Modelling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes. Nature 372(6503):255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boutton TW (1991) Stable carbon isotope ratios of natural materials: II. Atmospheric, terrestrial, marine, and freshwater environments. Carbon Isot Tech 1:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robert L (1995) Differentiation between littoral and pelagic food webs in lakes using stable carbon isotopes. Limnol Oceanogr 40(7):1310–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    MacLeod NA, Barton DR (1998) Effects of light intensity, water velocity, and species composition on carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in periphyton. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(8):1919–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brabandere LD, Frazer TK, Montoya JP (2010) Stable nitrogen isotope ratios of macrophytes and associated periphyton along a nitrate gradient in two subtropical, spring-fed streams. Freshw Biol 52(8):1564–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harris L (2016) The effect of water velocity on carbon isotope fractionation of aquatic macrophytes (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Finlay JC, Khandwala S, Power ME (2008) Spatial Scales of carbon flow in a river food web. Ecology 83(7):1845–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cornelisen CD, Wing SR, Clark KL, Bowman MH, Frew RD, Hurd CL (2007) Patterns in the δ13C and δ15N signature of Ulva pertusa: interaction between physical gradients and nutrient source pools. Limnol Oceanogr 52(2):820–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hill WR, Middleton RG (2006) Changes in carbon stable isotope ratios during periphyton development. Limnol Oceanogr 51(51):2360–2369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    O’Brien DM (2015) Stable isotope ratios as biomarkers of diet for health research. Annu Rev Nutr 35(35):565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoffman J (2016) Tracing the origins, migrations, and other movements of fishes using stable isotopes. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vinagre C, Madeira C, Dias M, Narciso L, Mendonça V (2016) Can stable isotopes be used to infer site fidelity of nekton in open coastal areas? Ecol Indic 71:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rasmussen JB, Trudeau V (2010) How well are velocity effects on δ13C signatures transmitted up the food web from algae to fish? Freshw Biol 55(6):1303–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Michaud WK, Dempson JB, Reist JD, Power M (2014) Ecological influences on the difference in δ15N and δ13C values between fish tissues: implications for studies of temporal diet variation. Ecol Freshw Fish 22(4):520–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sweeting CJ, Barry J, Barnes C, Polunin NVC, Jennings S (2007) Effects of body size and environment on diet-tissue δ15N fractionation in fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 340(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yemisken E, Forero MG, Megalofonou P, Erylmaz L, Navarro J (2017) Feeding habits of three Batoids in the Levantine Sea (north-eastern Mediterranean Sea) based on stomach content and isotopic data. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. doi: 10.1017/S002531541700073X
  47. 47.
    Allan JD, Castillo MM (2007) Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fitzsimons JD, Dalton AJM, Macveigh B, Honeyfield DC (2013) Use of Stable Isotopes to Identify Redds of Putative Hatchery and Wild Atlantic Salmon and Evaluate Their Spawning Habitat and Egg Thiamine Status in a Lake Ontario Tributary. N Am J Fish Manag 33(4):741–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Økland F, Heggberget TG, Jonsson B (2010) Migratory behaviour of wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during spawning. J Fish Biol 46(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Oppedal F, Dempster T, Stien LH (2011) Environmental drivers of atlantic salmon behaviour in sea-cages: a review. Aquaculture 311(1–4):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tanaka Y, Iguchi K, Yoshimura J, Nakagiri N, Tainaka K (2011) Historical effect in the territoriality of ayu fish. J Theor Biol 268(1):98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Brown C, Davidson T, Laland K (2003) Environmental enrichment and prior experience of live prey improve foraging behaviour in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 63(s1):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Arlinghaus R, Kai L, Johnson BM, Cooke SJ, Cowx IG (2015) Management of freshwater fisheries: addressing habitat, people and fishes.Freshwater fisheries ecology. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin ChinaInstitute of Water Resources and Hydropower ResearchBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Urban and Environmental EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations