Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 314, Issue 2, pp 1417–1423 | Cite as

Rapid method to determine 226Ra in steel samples

  • Sherrod L. Maxwell
  • Brian Culligan
  • Jay B. Hutchison
  • Ralf Sudowe
  • Daniel R. McAlister


The rapid measurement of 226Ra in steel samples is very important in the event of a radiological emergency. 226Ra (T 1/2 = 1600 y) is a natural radionuclide present in the environment and a highly toxic alpha-emitter. Due to its long life and tendency to concentrate in bones, 226Ra ingestion or inhalation can lead to significant committed dose to individuals. A new method for the determination of 226Ra in steel samples has been developed at the Savannah River Environmental Laboratory. The new method employs a rugged acid digestion method that includes hydrofluoric acid, followed by a single precipitation step to rapidly preconcentrate the radium and remove most of the dissolved steel sample matrix. Radium is then separated using a combination of cation exchange and extraction chromatography, and 226Ra is measured by alpha spectrometry. This approach has a sample preparation time of ~ 8 h for steel samples, has a very high tracer yield (> 88%), and removes interferences effectively. A 133Ba yield tracer is used so that samples can be counted immediately following the separation method, avoiding lengthy ingrowth times that are required in other methods.


Rapid method Digestion Decommissioning Steel 226Ra Emergency 



This work was performed under the auspices of the Department of Energy, DOE Contract No. DE-AC09-08SR22470. The authors wish to acknowledge Becky Chavous and Dale Duke for their assistance with this work.


  1. 1.
    Maxwell S, Culligan B (2012) Rapid determination of 226Ra in environmental samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 293(1):149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stricklin DL, Tjarnhage A, Nygren U (2002) Application of low energy gamma-spectrometry in rapid actinide analysis for emergency preparedness. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 251(1):69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maxwell S, Culligan B, Wall AG (2011) Rapid radiochemical method for determination of actinides in emergency concrete and brick samples. Anal Chim Acta 701:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rapid radiochemical method for 226Ra in building materials for environmental remediation following radiological incidents. Accessed 4 May 2017
  5. 5.
    Mexico finds stolen radioactive material amid dirty bomb fears. Accessed 4 May 2017
  6. 6.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (2003) Categorization of radioactive sources. IAEA-TECDOC-1344. IAEAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedrich S, Stan R, Lyudmila Z (2008) Risk due to radiological terror attacks with natural radionuclides. AIP Conf Proc 1034:3. doi: 10.1063/1.2991254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller C, Whitcomb R, Ansari A, McCurley C, Nemhauser N, Jones R (2012) Murder by radiation poisoning, implications for public health. J Environ Health 74(10):8Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maxwell S, Culligan B, Hutchison J, McAlister D, Sudowe R (2016) Rapid method to determine89/90Sr in steel samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi: 10.1007/s10967-017-5402-z Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ALMERA proficiency test determination of naturally occurring in phosphogypsum and water—IAEA/IAEA-CU-2008-04. Accessed 4 May 2017
  11. 11.
    Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative and quantitative determination. Anal Chem 40:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Es EM, Russell BC, Ivanov P et al (2017) The behaviour of 226Ra in high-volume environmental water samples on TK100 resin. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 312:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherrod L. Maxwell
    • 1
  • Brian Culligan
    • 1
  • Jay B. Hutchison
    • 1
  • Ralf Sudowe
    • 2
  • Daniel R. McAlister
    • 3
  1. 1.Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLCAikenUSA
  2. 2.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.PG Research Foundation, Inc.LisleUSA

Personalised recommendations