Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 314, Issue 2, pp 721–725 | Cite as

Bilateral comparison of 14C activity measurements at the NCBJ RC POLATOM and the ENEA-INMRI

  • T. Ziemek
  • M. Capogni
  • R. Broda
  • P. De Felice
  • T. Dziel
  • A. Jęczmieniowski
  • E. Lech
  • A. Listkowska
  • Z. Tymiński
Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

A bilateral comparison of 14C activity measurements between ENEA-INMRI (Italy) and NCBJ RC POLATOM (Poland) was organized in the year 2015 and piloted by POLATOM, which provided the sources for the comparison. A set of six sources in Ultima Gold scintillator was measured at POLATOM using four different counters by two liquid scintillation counting methods: TDCR and CIEMAT/NIST. Three of sources were measured also at ENEA-INMRI by using two different TDCR counters. The results achieved in the comparison show an excellent agreement.

Keywords

14Activity comparison TDCR CIEMAT/NIST 

References

  1. 1.
    IAEA (2004) Management of waste containing Tritium and Carbon-14. Technical reports series no. 421Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, publication 60. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iroulart M-G (2007) Thermodynamic stability of radioactivity standard solutions. In: Monographie BIPM-6, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, SèvresGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broda R (2003) A review of the triple-to-double coincidence ratio (TDCR) method for standardizing radionuclides. Appl Radiat Isot 58:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broda R, Cassette P, Kossert K (2007) Radionuclide metrology using liquid scintillation counting. Metrologia 44:S36–S52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziemek T, Jęczmieniowski A, Cacko D, Broda R, Lech E (2016) A new 4π(LS)-γ coincidence counter at NCBJ RC POLATOM with TDCR detector in the beta channel. Appl Radiat Isot 109:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chyliński A, Broda R, Radoszewski T (2003) The national standard unit of radionuclide activity and the related standards in Poland. Nukleonika 48(1):51–55Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lannunziata MF (2012) Handbook of radioactivity analysis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 491–504Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Capogni M, De Felice P (2014) A prototype of a portable TDCR system at ENEA. Appl Radiat Isot 93:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    TDCR method (2017) ICRM liquid scintillator counting working group. http://www.nucleide.org/ICRM_LSCWG/icrmtdcr.htm
  12. 12.
    Bé M-M, Chisté V, Dulieu C, Mougeot X, Chechev V, Kondev F G, Nichols A L, Huang X, Wang B (2013) Table of radionuclide. In: BIPM Monographie 5, vol 7, p 1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    EN ISO/IEC 17043:2010. Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing. European Standard. CEN/CENELEC, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MRA (1999) Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes. In: international committee for weights and measures. http://www.bipm.org/pdf/mra/pdf
  15. 15.
    Ratel G (2005) Evaluation of the uncertainty of the degree of equivalence. Metrologia 42:140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Ziemek
    • 1
  • M. Capogni
    • 2
  • R. Broda
    • 1
  • P. De Felice
    • 2
  • T. Dziel
    • 1
  • A. Jęczmieniowski
    • 1
  • E. Lech
    • 1
  • A. Listkowska
    • 1
  • Z. Tymiński
    • 1
  1. 1.National Centre for Nuclear Research Radioisotope Centre POLATOMOtwockPoland
  2. 2.ENEA National Institute of Ionizing Radiation Metrology (ENEA-INMRI), Casaccia Research CentreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations