Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 311, Issue 2, pp 1309–1314 | Cite as

Numerical simulation on scintillator detector response for determining element content in PGNAA system

  • Feng Zhang
  • Lili Tian
  • Juntao Liu
  • Xinguang Wang
Article

Abstract

For selecting gamma ray detector to determining element content using prompt gamma neutron activation analysis technique, the response of BGO and LaBr3 scintillator detectors was compared with Monte Carlo simulation method. The simulation models under different formation composed of various elements were established by MCNP, and then gamma ray spectrum was processed by least squares method. It is concluded that the element calculation accuracy will be different when scintillator was changed. With higher energy resolution, LaBr3 scintillator can be used to improve the accuracy of the element content calculation result, and is more suitable for plentiful element formation.

Keywords

Prompt gamma neutron activity analysis LaBr3 scintillator Geochemical well logging Least squares method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41374125, 41574119), and the Special Fund of Central College Basic Research Operating Expenses (14CX05011A, 15CX06008A).

References

  1. 1.
    Marschall HR, Kasztovszky Z, Gméling K, Altherr R (2005) Chemical analysis of high-pressure metamorphic rocks by PGNAA: comparison with results from XRF and solution ICP-MS. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 265(2):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baidoo IK, Dampare SB, Opata NS, Nyarko BJB, Akaho EHK, Quagraine RE (2013) Determination of aluminium, silicon and magnesium in geological matrices by delayed neutron activation analysis based on k 0 instrumental neutron activation analysis. Appl Radiat Isot 82:152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hei D, Jiang Z, Jia W, Cheng C, Wang H, Li J, Chen D (2016) The background influence of cadmium detection in saline water using PGNAA technique. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi: 10.1007/s10967-016-4767-8 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ajayi O, Torres-Verdín C, Preeg WE (2015) Fast numerical simulation of logging-while-drilling gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements. Geophysics 80(5):D501–D523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pemper RR, Sommer A, Guo P, Jacobi D, Longo J, Bliven S, Han X (2006) A new pulsed neutron sonde for derivation of formation lithology and mineralogy. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum EngineersGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radtke RJ, Lorente M, Adolph B, Berheide M, Fricke S, Grau J, May D (2012) A new capture and inelastic spectroscopy tool takes geochemical logging to the next level. In SPWLA 53rd annual logging symposium. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log AnalystsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Loef EVD, Dorenbos P, Van Eijk CWE, Kramer K, Gudel HU (2001) High-energy-resolution scintillator: Ce3 + activated LaBr3. Appl Phys Lett 79(10):1573–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moses WW, Shah KS (2005) Potential for RbGd2 Br7: Ce, LaBr3: Ce, LaBr3: Ce, and LuI3: Ce in nuclear medical imaging. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 537(1):317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng Z, Jun-tao L (2014) Monte Carlo simulation of PGNAA system for determining element content in the rock sample. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299(3):1219–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Briesmeister JF (2000). MCNPTM—A general Monte Carlo N-particle transport code. Version 4C, LA-13709-M, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los AlamosGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu W, Xiao L, Zhang L, Niu W (2012) Calculating standard captured γ spectra of formation elements. Pet Sci 9(4):463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sears VF (1992) Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. Neutron News 3(3):26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lili Tian
    • 1
  • Juntao Liu
    • 1
  • Xinguang Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Laboratory for Marine Mineral ResourcesQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations