Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 307, Issue 3, pp 2307–2312 | Cite as

Combined photon–neutron radiography for nondestructive analysis of materials

  • Jessica Hartman
  • Alexander Barzilov


Combined photon–neutron radiography was investigated as a nondestructive method to determine the shape and material composition of complex objects. A system consisting of photon and neutron sources in a cone-beam configuration and a 2D detector array was modeled using the MCNP5 code. Photon-to-neutron transmission ratios were determined for a car engine using 0.1, 0.5, 2.5 MeV neutrons and 0.2, 0.5, 1 MeV photons. Focusing on inherent difference between neutron and photon interactions with matter, it was possible to classify materials within the scanned object.


Fast neutron radiography Photon radiography Nondestructive analysis Monte Carlo simulation MCNP5 


  1. 1.
    Pazdera L, Topolar L (2014) Application acoustic emission method during concrete frost resistance. Russ J Nondestruct Test 50:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schabowicz K, Suvorov V (2014) Nondestructive testing of a bottom surface and construction of its profile by ultrasonic tomography. Russ J Nondestruct Test 50:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ying Z, Naidu R, Crawford C (2006) Dual energy computed tomography for explosive detection. J X-ray Sci Technol 14:235–256Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reimers P, Gilboy W, Goebbels J (1984) Recent developments in the industrial application of computerized tomography with ionizing radiation. NDT Int 17:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee N, Jung S, Kim J (2009) Evaluation of the measurement geometries and data processing algorithms for industrial gamma tomography technology. Appl Radiat Isot 67:1441–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen G, Bennett G, Perticone D (2007) Dual-energy X-ray radiography for automatic high-Z material detection. Nucl Instrum Methods B 261:356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gozani T (2004) The role of neutron based inspection technique in the post 9/11/01 era. Nucl Instrum Methods B 213:460–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seibert J (2004) X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: basic principles of X-ray production. J Nucl Med Technol 32:139–147Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toriwaki J, Yoshida H (2009) Fundamentals of three-dimensional digital image processing. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Y, Sowerby BD, Tickner JR (2008) Comparison of neutron and high-energy X-ray dual-beam radiography for air cargo inspection. Appl Radiat Isot 66:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Los Alamos National Laboratory, A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code (2003) LAUR-03-1987, Version 5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vainionpaa J, Chen A, Piestrup M, Gary C, Jones G, Patell R (2015) Development of high flux thermal neutron generator for neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods B 350:88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wehmeyer A, Radel R, Kulcinski G (2005) Optimizing neutron production rates from D–D fusion in an inertial electrostatic confinement device. Fusion Sci Technol 47(4):1260–1264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations