Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 307, Issue 3, pp 1795–1800 | Cite as

A new bench-top approach to the isotopic purification of 244Pu

  • Martin Liezers
  • Orville T. FarmerIII
  • May L. Thomas
  • George J. Hager
  • Gregory C. Eiden


A new approach to isotopic purification has been developed and applied to the production of a small quantity of 244Pu with an isotopic purity >99.996 %, as compared against the standard 244Pu available that displays an isotopic purity of 97.87 %. The presence of Pu isotopes 239Pu, 240Pu, 241Pu and 242Pu have been greatly reduced, allowing for higher spiking levels of the isotopically purified 244Pu tracer to be used in environmental level sample analysis. Details of the isotopic purification process will be described along with the effect this improved Pu tracer could have on analytical Pu mass spectrometry measurements.


Isotope enrichment Isotope purification 244Pu Nuclear forensics High purity isotopes 



Our thanks to JM Cloutier and MP Dion. The research described in this paper is part of the Ultrasensitive Nuclear Measurement Initiative at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). It was conducted under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at PNNL, a multiprogram national laboratory operated by Battelle for the US Department of Energy.


  1. 1.
    Inn KGW, Johnson CM, Oldham W, Jerome S, Tandon L, Schaaff T, Jones R, Mackney D, MacKill P, Palmer B, Smith D, LaMont S, Griggs J (2013) The urgent requirement for new radioanalytical certified reference materials for nuclear safeguards, forensics, and consequence management. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 196:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inn KGW, Kurosaki H, Frechou C, Gilligan C, Jones R, LaMont S, Leggitt J, Li C, McCroan K, Swatski R (2008) A blueprint for radioanalytical metrology CRMs, intercomparisons and PE. Appl Radiat Iso 66:835–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krickinsky A, Canaan D, Giaquinto J, Hexel C (2014) The need for high-purity uranium-233. In: 8th International Conference on Isotopes, Chicago, 24–28 August 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jerome SM, Ivanov P, Larijani C, Parker DJ, Regan PH (2014) The production of Neptunium-236g. J Environ Radioact 138:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Goldberg SA, Cappis J, Clarke S, Whitesel R (2001) Efforts to save 244Pu in mark 18A targets for use in international safeguards measurement IAEA-SM-367/5/01/PGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nier AO, Booth ET, Dunning JR, Grosse AV (1940) Nuclear fission of separated uranium isotopes. Phys Rev 57:546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yergey AL, Yergey AK (1997) Preparative scale mass spectrometry: a brief history of the Calutron. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 8:943–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parkins WE (2005) The uranium bomb, the Calutron, and the space charge problem. Phys Today 58(5):45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liezers M, Farmer OT, Dion MP, Thomas ML, Eiden GC (2015) The production of ultra-high purity single isotopes or tailored isotope mixtures by ICP-MS. Phys Today 376:58–64Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu K, Houk RS (1996) Ion deposition by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Vac Sci Technol A 14:370–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dion MP, Liezers M, Farmer OT III, Thomas ML, Eiden GC (2015) Improving alpha spectrometry energy resolution by ion implantation with ICP-MS. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 303:877–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Liezers
    • 1
  • Orville T. FarmerIII
    • 1
  • May L. Thomas
    • 1
  • George J. Hager
    • 1
  • Gregory C. Eiden
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryRichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations