Field method for the rapid determination of traces of uranium in rocks, soil and stream sediments by fluorescence measurement
- 148 Downloads
A rapid field method for the determination of ppm level uranium (U) in rocks, soils and stream sediments fluorimetrically has been developed. By simply eliminating iron, which seriously interferes in the direct determination of U due to quantity quenching, U can be reliably determined in the field with high throughput of analysis. Also, a novel concept of “iron to uranium ratio” has been introduced in the paper to demonstrate the serious negative role of iron in the ppm level determination of U fluorimetrically in silicate rocks and soils as a part of geochemical exploration of U.
KeywordsFluorimetry Soil 2,3 Dihydroxynaphthalene Liquid–liquid extraction
Authors are thankful to Shri Pramod Kumar, Regional Director, AMD, Eastern Region, Jamshedpur for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research project. Authors are also grateful to Shri P. S. Parihar, Director, AMD for giving kind permission to publish the work.
- 1.Smith AY, Lynch JJ (1969) Field and laboratory methods used by the Geological Survey of Canada in geochemical surveys. No. 11, uranium in soils, stream sediment and water, paper 69-40. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, p 9Google Scholar
- 3.Santosa JS, Teixeira LSG, dos Santos WNL, Lemos VA, Godoye JM, Ferreira SLC (2010) Anal Chim Acta 674:141–156Google Scholar
- 11.Editorial Staff (1992) Technical report on analytical techniques in uranium exploration and ore processing, series no. 341. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, Vienna, p 65. ISBN 92-0-103792-9Google Scholar
- 12.Tarafder PK, Sardana AK (2000) Chem Anal (Wars) 45:145–166Google Scholar
- 13.Wilson SA (1998) Data compilation and statistical analysis of intra laboratory results for AGV-2. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (in progress)Google Scholar
- 17.Donaldson EM (1978) Methods for the analysis of ores, rocks and related materials, Monograph 881. Mines Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, p 49Google Scholar