Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 305, Issue 2, pp 567–571 | Cite as

Calibration of the angular energy efficiency of an in situ spectrometer based on a LaBr3(Ce) detector

  • Slawomir Jednorog
  • Krzysztof Ciupek
  • Pawel Krajewski
  • Ewa Laszynska
  • Adam Ziolkowski


The angular response of an environmental γ-spectrometer equipped with a LaBr3(Ce) detector is characterized. The efficiency calibration was performed via mathematical and experimental methods and yielded three-dimensional maps of angle, energy, and efficiency. The applicability and limitation of the mathematical calibration were evaluated by relative uncertainty propagation. The uncertainty is in the range of 65 % for γ-rays with energies below 250 keV, up to 35 % in the range 250–550 keV, and approximately 10 % for other energies. These are acceptable levels of accuracy for environmental monitoring.


Angular efficiency Environmental monitoring LaBr3(Ce) detector Numerical modeling 



This work was performed within the EUROfusion Consortium and received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, under grant agreement 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not reflect those of the European Commission. This project (No.: SP/J/6/143339/11) was supported by a grant from the National Centre for Research and Development (NCBiR) entitled ‘Technologies Supporting Development of Safe Nuclear Power Engineering: Development of nuclear safety and radiological protection methods for nuclear power engineering current and future needs’ (research network leader—Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection). The financial support of the NCBiR is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Report IAEA-TECDOC-1363,2003 Guidelines for radioelement mapping using gamma ray spectrometry dataIAEAViennaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller KM, Shebell P (1993) In-situ Gamma-ray spectrometry—a tutorial for environmental radiation scientists. Environmental Measurements Laboratory U. S, Department of Energy, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ICRU Report 53 (1994) Gamma-ray spectrometry in the environment. Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Milbrath BD, Choate BJ, Fast JE, Hensley WK, Kouzes RT, Schweppe JE (2007) Comparison of LaBr3: ce and NaI(Tl) scintillators for radio-isotope identification devices. Nucl Instrum Methods A 572:774–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nicolini R, Camera F, Blasi N, Brambilla S, Bassini R, Boiano C, Bracco A, Crespi FCL, Wieland O, Benzoni G, Leoni S, Million B, Montanari D, Zalite A (2007) Investigation of the properties of a 1″ × 1″ LaBr3: ce scintillator. Nucl Instrum Methods A 582:554–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciupek K, Jednorog S, Fujak M, Szewczak K (2014) Evaluation of efficiency for in situ gamma spectrometer based upon cerium-doped lanthanum bromide detector dedicated for environmental radiation monitoring. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:1345–1350. doi: 10.1007/s10967-013-2906-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reilly D, Ensslin Smith H Jr (1991) Passive nondestructive assay of nuclear materials office of nuclear regulatory research. Washington, Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glimore G (2008) Practical gamma-ray spectrometry, 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Model ISXCLLA1 1.5x1.5 LaBr3 Detectors Characterization Report (2007) Canberra Industries, MeridenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janis 4—Java-based Nuclear Data Information System, Accessed 6 Nov 2014
  13. 13.
    Jednorog S, Szydlowski A, Scholz M, Paduch M, Bienkowska B (2012) Preliminary determination of angular distribution of neutrons emitted from PF-1000 facility by indium activation. Nukleonika 57(4):563–568Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slawomir Jednorog
    • 1
  • Krzysztof Ciupek
    • 2
  • Pawel Krajewski
    • 2
  • Ewa Laszynska
    • 1
  • Adam Ziolkowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser MicrofusionWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Central Laboratory for Radiological ProtectionWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations