Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 304, Issue 3, pp 1261–1274 | Cite as

Efficacy of extraction of U(VI) by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) using TOPO, D2EHPA and TOA

  • Diptendu Das
  • V. A. Juvekar
  • R. Bhattacharya


The response surface methodology is used to obtain optimal rate and extent of extraction of low concentration U(VI) (≤100 mg/L) by liquid emulsion membrane technique. Three different ligands viz. Tri-n-octyl phosphine oxide (TOPO), Tri-n-octyl amine (TOA) and Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA), are used. 23 factorial design is applied to generate second order regression equation for studying the effect of concentration of ligand, surfactant and feed acidity. The regression model is in good agreement with the experimental data for all ligands. The rate of extraction of U(VI) by LEM is found to be in the order TOA > TOPO > D2EHPA.


Uranium (VI) TOPO D2EHPA TOA Liquid emulsion membranes (LEM) 



The author wishes to thank Quality Control Division of Uranium Extraction Division (QCS-UED), Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, India for allowing us to carry out the experimental work.


  1. 1.
    Ahmad AL, Kusumastuti A, Derek CJC, Ooi BS (2011) Emulsion liquid membrane for heavy metal removal: an overview on emulsion stabilization and destabilization. Chem Eng J 171:870–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stas J, Dahdough A, Shlewit H, Khorfan S (2002) Statistical study of factors affecting the co-extraction of uranium and iron in the second cycle of extraction with DEHPA/TOPO in kerosene. Hydrometallurgy 65:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kadous A, Didi MA, Villemin D (2009) Extraction of Uranium (VI) using D2EHPA/TOPO based supported liquid Membrane. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 280(1):157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leepipatpaiboon Natchanun, Pancharoen U, Sunsandee N, Ramakul P (2014) Factorial design in optimization of the separation of uranium from yellowcake across a hollow fiber supported liquid membrane, with mass transport modeling. Korean J Chem Eng 31(5):868–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Reefy SA, Selim YT, Aly HF (1997) Equilibrium and kinetic studies on the separation of uranium and thorium from nitric acid medium by liquid emulsion membrane based on trioctylphosphine oxide extractant. Anal Sci 13(3):333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kulkarni PS (2003) Recovery of uranium(VI) from acidic wastes using tri-n-octylphosphine oxide and sodium carbonate based liquid membranes. Chem Eng J 92(1–3):209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macasek F, Rajec P, Rehacek V, Anh VN, Popovnakova T (1997) Emulsion membrane systems for preconcentration of uranium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem Lett 13(3):333–337Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    El-Hazek NT, El Sayed MS (2003) Direct uranium extraction from dihydrate and hemi-dihydrate wet process phosphoric acids by liquid emulsion membrane. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 257(2):347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Sayed MS (2003) Uranium extraction from gatar sulfate leach liquor using aliquat-336 in a liquid emulsion membrane process. Hydrometallurgy 68(1–3):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Reefy SA, Selim YT, Aly HF (1998) Recovery of uranium from thorium in hydrochloric acid medium by liquid emulsion membranes containing trioctylphosphine oxidem. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 228(1–2):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulkarni PS, Mukhopadhyay S, Bellary MP, Ghosh SK (2002) Studies on membrane stability and recovery of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions using a liquid emulsion membrane process. Hydrometallurgy 64(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirato T, Kishigami I, Awakura Y, Majima H (1991) Concentration of uranyl sulfate solution by an emulsion-type liquid membrane process. Hydrometallurgy 26(1):19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo J-X, Sun X, Du D-L, Wu X, Li M-X, Pang H, Sun S-X, Wang A-H (1991) Uranium (VI) extraction from chloride solution with benzyloctadecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (BODMAC) in a liquid membrane process. Hydrometallurgy 26(1):19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Das D, Juvekar VA, Roy SB, Bhattacharya R (2014) Comparative studies on Co-extraction of Uranium (VI) and different mineral acid from aqueous feed solutions using TBP, TOPO and TOA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 300:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abdelziz Y, Mohamed N, Abdelmonem A, Karameldin T (2012) Studies on membrane stability for recovery of uranium from waste solution by liquid emulsion membrane (LEM). J Am Sci 8(12):1292–1297Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elsayed HM, Foaud EA, El-Hazek NMT, Khoniem AK (2013) Uranium extraction enhancement from phosphoric acid by emulsion liquid membrane. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298:1763–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das D, Juvekar VA, Bhattacharya R (2015) ‘Problem associated with the use of TBP for LEM extraction of U(VI) and attempt to overcome this problem using other ligands (Article in press)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Misra NL (2006) Uranium determination in seawater by total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochimica Acta Part B 61:1166–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Candela AM, Benatti V, Pallet C (2013) Pre-concentration of Uranium (VI) using bulk liquid and supported liquid membrane systems optimized containing bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid as carrier in low concentrations. Sep Purif Technol 120:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kedari CS, Pandit SS, Gandhi PM (2013) Separation by competitive transport of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) nitrates across supported renewable liquid membrane containing trioctylphosphine oxide as metal carrier. J Membr Sci 430:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popov L (2013) Novel method for determination of uranium isotopes in environmental samples by liquid-liquid extraction with triisooctylamine in sulfuric and hydrochloric acid media. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Atomic Energy Regulatory BoardMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations