Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 302, Issue 2, pp 791–795 | Cite as

Radionuclides and trace elements in centipede species Scolopendra cingulata from Serbia

  • I. Antović
  • D. Stojanović
  • N. Svrkota
  • R. Žižić
  • D. Antić
  • N. M. Antović
Article

Abstract

The adults of centipede Scolopendra cingulata from Serbia have been analyzed for 214Bi, 137Cs, 228Ac, 40K, 212Pb and 214Pb activity. The top 5 cm of soil from the same locations (Novi Pazar, Izbice and Pčinja) is also measured—to estimate upper limit of the soil–S. cingulata radionuclide transfer factors (i.e., S. cingulata/soil concentration ratios), as well as the total dose rate—external and internal exposure. Cesium-137 activity was found to be below (or equal to) minimum detectable activity in all 16 specimens. The highest measured 214Bi activity was 0.1 Bq g−1, while 228Ac—0.086 Bq g−1, 40K—0.12 Bq g−1, 212Pb—0.012 Bq g−1 and 214Pb—0.029 Bq g−1. Bismut-214 transfer factors are found to range from <0.34 to 6, as 228Ac—from <0.4 to 3, whilst the total dose rate is found to be less than 18 μGy h−1. The As, Se, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, but also Zn and Fe concentrations—in three individuals, were also determined. All the elements showed concentrations in the Pčinja S. cingulata significantly lower than in S. cingulata from Novi Pazar and Izbice.

Keywords

S.cingulata Radioactivity Trace elements 

References

  1. 1.
    Edgecombe GD, Bonato L (2011) In: Minelli A (ed) Scolopendromorpha. The Myriapoda, vol 1. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitić BM, Tomić VT (2002) Arch Biol Sci 54:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kahraman A, Kaynak G, Akkaya G, Gürler O, Yalçın S (2013) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295:1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smodiš B, Štrok M, Černe M (2014) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva RCA, Saiki M (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Lewis JGE (2010) Int J Myriap 3:83–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klingel H (1960) Z Tierpsychol 17(1):11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    HASL-300 (1997) EML procedures manual. US Department of Energy, 28 ednGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ORTEC (2003) Gamma-vision 32. Gamma-ray spectrum analysis NCA emulator for MicrosoftGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    UNSCEAR 2008 (2011) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Annex E: effects of ionizing radiation on non-human biota, United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amiro BD (1997) J Environ Radioact 35:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singhal RK, Ajay K, Usha N, Reddy AVR (2009) Radiat Prot Dosim 133:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Descamps M, Fabre MC, Grelle C, Gerard S (1996) Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31:350–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopkin SP, Martin MH (1983) Environ Pollut 6:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Antović
    • 1
  • D. Stojanović
    • 1
  • N. Svrkota
    • 2
  • R. Žižić
    • 2
  • D. Antić
    • 3
  • N. M. Antović
    • 4
  1. 1.Department for Biomedical SciencesState University of Novi PazarNovi PazarSerbia
  2. 2.Centre for Ecotoxicological ResearchPodgoricaMontenegro
  3. 3.Institute of Zoology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  4. 4.Faculty of Natural Sciences and MathematicsUniversity of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro

Personalised recommendations