Determination of 129I/127I in environmental water before and after the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident with a solid extraction disk

  • Shigeru Bamba
  • Kosei E. Yamaguchi
  • Hikaru Amano


A method that combines solid extraction with accelerator mass spectrometry was applied to determine 129I in terrestrial environmental water samples. To validate the method, water samples were spiked with diluted NIST SRM 3231 129I isotopic standard (high level). Then 129I/127I ratios in river and pond waters in Fukushima and Ibaraki prefectures were measured in samples obtained both before and after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident caused by the great earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011. Before the accident, 129I/127I was 1.1–3.5 × 10−9 in the river waters and 6.0–6.6 × 10−9 in the pond waters, and afterwards it was 3.3–8.4 × 10−9 in the river waters and 3.7–6.5 × 10−8 in the pond waters, reflecting the large amounts of radionuclides that were released into the environment by the accident. In the samples collected in April 2011, 129I/127I ratios were about one order of magnitude larger in pond water, and several times higher in river water, compared with the samples collected before the accident.


129Isotopic ratio Solid extraction Accelerator mass spectrometry River Pond Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident 



This work was performed under the Common-Use Facility Program of JAEA. The authors acknowledge the staff members of the Mutsu AMS facility of JAEA for providing isotope data of excellent quality.


  1. 1.
    Krupp G, Aumann DC (1999) J Environ Radioact 46:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frechou C, Calmet D (2003) J Environ Radioact 70:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schnabel C, Lopez-Gutierrez JM, Szidat S, Sprenger M, Wernli H, Beer J, Synal HA (2001) Radiochim Acta 89:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hou XL, Dahlgaard D, Nielsen SP (2000) Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 51:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hou XL, Dahlgaard D, Nielsen SP (2002) J Environ Radioact 61:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hou XL, Dahlgaard H, Nielsen SP (2001) Mar Chem 74:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suzuki T, Kabuto S, Amano H, Togawa O (2008) Quat Geochronol 3:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muramatsu Y, Takada Y, Matsuzaki H, Yoshida S (2008) Quat Geochronol 3:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ohno T, Muramatsu Y, Toyama C, Nakano K, Kakuta S, Matsuzaki H (2013) Anal Sci 29:271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suzuki T, Bamba S, Kitamura T, Kabuto S, Isogai K, Amano H (2007) Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 259:370–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyake Y, Matsuzaki H, Fujiwara T, Saito T, Yamagata T, Honda M, Muramatsu Y (2012) Geochem J 46:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suzuki T, Aramaki T, Kitamura T, Togawa O (2004) Nucl Instr Meth B 223–224:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2013) Accessed 2 Sept 2013
  14. 14.
    Kushita K, Amano H (2003) JAERI-Conf 2003-010: p 361–367Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snyder G, Fehn U (2004) Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 223–224:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matsuzaki H, Tokuyama H, Miyake Y, Honda M, Yamagata T, Muramatsu Y (2013) Proceeding of the 15th Japanese symposium on accelerator mass spectrometry: 66–69 (in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeru Bamba
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kosei E. Yamaguchi
    • 2
  • Hikaru Amano
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Japan Chemical Analysis CenterChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryToho UniversityFunabashiJapan

Personalised recommendations