Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 299, Issue 1, pp 721–724 | Cite as

Americium and samarium determination in aqueous solutions after separation by cation-exchange



The concentration of trivalent americium and samarium in aqueous samples has been determined by means of alpha-radiometry and UV–Vis photometry, respectively, after chemical separation and pre-concentration of the elements by cation-exchange using Chelex-100 resin. Method calibration was performed using americium (241Am) and samarium standard solutions and resulted in a high chemical recovery for cation-exchange. Regarding, the effect of physicochemical parameters (e.g. pH, salinity, competitive cations and colloidal species) on the separation recovery of the trivalent elements from aqueous solutions by cation-exchange has also been investigated. The investigation was performed to evaluate the applicability of cation-exchange as separation and pre-concentration method prior to the quantitative analysis of trivalent f-elements in water samples, and has shown that the method could be successfully applied to waters with relatively low dissolved solid content.


Trivalent f-elements Determination Cation-exchange Composition Chemical recovery 



The research leading to these results has received funding from the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation (Grant agreement no. ANABATHMISI/PAGIO/0308/04) and the University of Cyprus.


  1. 1.
    Kim JI (1993) The chemical behavior of transuranium elements and barrier functions in natural aquifer systems. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 294:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choppin GR (1995) Comparative solution chemistry of the 4f and 5f elements. J Alloys Comp 223:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antoniou S, Pashalidis I, Gessner A, Kumke MU (2011) The effect of humic acid on the formation and solubility of secondary solid phases (Nd(OH)CO3 and Sm(OH)CO3). Radiochim Acta 99:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antoniou S, Tsiaili A, Pashalidis I (2008) Alpha radiometry of uranium in surface and ground waters by liquid scintillation counting after separation of the radionuclide by cation exchange. Radiat Meas 43:1294–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pashalidis I, Tsertos H (2004) Radiometric determination of uranium in natural waters after enrichment and separation by cation-exchange and extraction techniques. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 260:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiliari T, Pashalidis I (2010) Alpha spectroscopic analysis of actinides (Th, U and Pu) after separation from aqueous solutions by cation-exchange and liquid extraction. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 284:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiliari T, Pashalidis I (2010) The effect of physicochemical parameters on the separation recovery of plutonium and uranium from aqueous solutions by cation exchange. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 286:467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiliari T, Pashalidis I (2010) Simplified alpha-spectroscopic analysis of uranium in natural waters after its separation by cation-exchange. Radiat Meas 45:966–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Killiari T, Pashalidis I (2012) Selective separation of actinyl(V, VI) cations from aqueous solutions by Chelex-100. Radiochim Acta 100:439–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savvin SB (1961) Analytical use of arsenazo III: determination of thorium, zirconium, uranium and rare earth elements. Talanta 8:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guillaumont R, Fanghänel Th, Fuger J, Grenthe I, Neck V, Palmer DA, Rand MH (2003) Update of the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium, and technetium. OECD-NEA, Paris, pp 120–130Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 150–157Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georghiou G, Pashalidis I (2007) Boron in groundwaters of Nicosia (Cyprus) and its treatment by reverse osmosis. Desalination 215:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demetriou A, Lysandrou M, Charalambides A, Pashalidis I (2010) Acid mine drainage treatment with dunite. Desal Water Treat 16:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim JI (1991) Actinide colloid generation in groundwater. Radiochim Acta 52–3:71–81Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Konstantinou M, Pashalidis I (2008) Competitive Sorption of Cu(II), Eu(III) and U(VI) ions on TiO2 in aqueous solutions—a potentiometric study. Colloid Surface A 324:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kolokassidou K, Szymczak W, Wolf M, Obermeier C, Buckau G, Pashalidis I (2009) Hydrophilic olive cake extracts: characterization by physicochemical properties and cu(ii) complexation. J Hazard Mater 164:442–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations