Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 295, Issue 3, pp 2015–2019 | Cite as

Effects of superglue fuming on materials characterization of zip-lock polyethylene bags for route forensic analyses

  • Carolyn J. Koester
  • James F. Blankenship
  • Patrick M. Grant


Using cyanoacrylate or “superglue” fuming to develop latent dermatoglyphic prints significantly altered the volatile and semivolatile compounds within the material of polyethylene zip-lock bags. Comparisons of SPME-GC/MS analyses of poly bags obtained before and after application of a glue fuming fingermark-developing technique resulted in markedly different material profiles of the bags. Not only were species added to the chemical composition of a bag, but other compounds that had been initially present were removed. These effects are particularly important for nuclear forensic investigations in the realm of route (pathway) analyses, and may also be of general interest to criminalistics laboratories that examine illicit drugs and their packaging.


Forensic science Nuclear smuggling Route analyses Zip-lock polyethylene bags Material composition Cyanoacrylate (superglue) fuming SPME GC/MS 



This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.


  1. 1.
    Moody KJ, Hutcheon ID, Grant PM (2005) Nuclear forensic analysis. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleverly B (1979) The comparison and matching of low density polyethylene plastic bags by infrared spectroscopy. J Forensic Sci 24:339–345Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gilbert J, Ingram JM, Scott MP, Underhill M (1991) The analysis of clingfilms by infrared spectroscopy and thermal desorption capillary gas chromatography. J Forensic Sci Soc 31:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castle DA, Gibbins B, Hamer PS (1994) Physical methods for examining and comparing transparent plastic bags and cling films. J Forensic Sci Soc 34:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsukame T, Kutsuzawa M, Sekine H, Saitoh H, Shibasaki Y (1999) Identification of polyethylene by differential scanning calorimetry – application to forensic science. J Therm Anal Calorim 57:847–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roux C, Bull S, Golding J, Lenard C (2000) Tracing the source of illicit drugs through plastic packaging—a database. J Foren Sci 45:99–114Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Causing V, Marge C, Carries P, Schiavone S, Marigo A (2006) A quantitative differentiation method for plastic bags by infrared spectroscopy, thickness measurement and differential scanning calorimetry for tracing the source of illegal drugs. Forensic Sci Int 164:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denton S (1981) Extrusion marks in polyethylene film. J Forensic Sci Soc 21:259–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pierce DS (1990) Identifiable markings on plastic. J Forensic Identif 40:51–59Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vanderkolk JR (1995) Identifying consecutively made garbage bags through manufactured characteristics. J Forensic Identif 45:38–50Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee HC, Gaensslen RE (1994) Advances in fingerprint technology. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn J. Koester
    • 1
  • James F. Blankenship
    • 2
  • Patrick M. Grant
    • 1
  1. 1.Forensic Science CenterLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUSA
  2. 2.Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Sciences UnitFBI LaboratoryQuanticoUSA

Personalised recommendations