Skip to main content
Log in

Anticoincidence INAA capabilities for analysis of FDA Total Diet Study seafoods

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anticoincidence instrumental neutron activation analysis was used to analyze three portions each of five fresh-weight FDA Total Diet Study seafoods from 3 Market Basket collections for fiscal years 2006–2008. Portions were treated with l-cysteine solutions to enhance retention of Hg during irradiation then dried at room temperature over magnesium perchlorate. Results or limits of detection were obtained for 33 elements. In general, results agreed with those available from FDA’s Kansas city field laboratory (KAN-DO). Of three shrimp composites analyzed, one showed mass fractions of Ag, Fe, rare earths, U, Th, and Mo significantly higher (up to a factor of 10) than the other two shrimp composites. The same shrimp composite showed a lower Hg result (about 50 % after accounting for any irradiation loss) compared to the KAN-DO value. This may represent a drying loss. There were other indications of Hg loss during the drying process. SRM 1947 Lake Michigan Fish Tissue, run as a control, yielded an INAA Hg mass fraction 20 % lower (corrected for irradiation losses) than the certified value, similar to the difference between the INAA (0.171 mg/kg Hg) and KAN-DO (0.211 mg/kg Hg) results for a TDS canned tuna composite. Because previous studies showed that l-cysteine effectively sequesters inorganic Hg, these discrepancies likely represent methyl mercury loss. INAA results for As, Fe, Rb, and Se were in good agreement with SRM 1947 certified values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currie LA (1968) Anal Chem 40(1):586–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Landsberger S, Biegalski SR, O’Kelly DJ, Basunia MS (2005) J Radioanal Chem 263(3):817–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson DL, Cunningham WC (2008) J Radioanal Chem 276(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson DL (2009) J Radioanal Chem 282(1):75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Total Diet Study (2010) U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/TotalDietStudy/default.htm Accessed 19 Dec 2011

  6. Anderson DL (2009) J Radioanal Chem 282(1):11–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindstrom RM, Zeisler R, Mackey EA, Popelka-Filcoff RS, Williams RE (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 278(1):665–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson M, Wood R (1993) J AOAC Int 76:926–940

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keith LH, Crummett W, Degan WJ, Libby RA, Taylor JK, Wentler G (1983) Anal Chem 55:2210–2218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blaauw M (1996) The k0-Consistent IRI Gamma-Ray Catalogue for INAA, Interfacultair Reactor Insituut van de Technische Universiteit Delft, the Netherlands

  11. Landsberger S (1989) Chem Geol 77:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zumholz K (2005) Doctoral Dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany

  13. Bettinelli M, Spezia S, Minoia C (2004) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18(4):465–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (2004) World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/en/uranium.pdf. Accessed Jan 30 2012

  15. Connel DB, Sanders JG, Riedel GF, Abbe GR (1991) Environ Sci Technol 25:921–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. EPA Integrated Risk Information System (1989) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0099.htm. Accessed Jan 30 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is indebted to the NCNR Reactor Operations staff and KAN-DO analysts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, D.L. Anticoincidence INAA capabilities for analysis of FDA Total Diet Study seafoods. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296, 187–194 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1930-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1930-8

Keywords

Navigation