Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technetium chemistry in a novel group actinide extraction process

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A newly developed method for advanced reprocessing of used nuclear fuel is the Group ActiNide EXtraction (GANEX) process. It is a liquid–liquid extraction process that aims at extracting all the actinides as a group from dissolved used nuclear fuel. This extraction can either be performed after a removal of the bulk uranium or directly on the dissolution liquor. At Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden a solvent that utilizes tributyl-phosphate (TBP) and a molecule from the bis-triazine bipyridine (BTBP) class of ligands dissolved in cyclohexanone has been developed for the use in a GANEX process. Previously the system has not been tested with the presence of technetium that is one of the major fission products. Technetium is often considered a problem within reprocessing since it has a chemical behaviour that differs from most other elements in the spent fuel. Therefore, a special emphasis was put on the investigation of technetium in the selected GANEX system. It was shown that technetium is readily extracted by the GANEX solvent and that cyclohexanone is the main extractant when no other metals were present in the system. It was also found that the presence of uranium decreased the overall technetium extraction despite a slight co-extraction with TBP, while irradiation of the GANEX solvent to large doses (>1 MGy) increased its technetium extraction capability. It was also discovered that an increased nitrate concentration in the aqueous phase and an addition of other fission products both inhibited the technetium extraction even though fission product loading most likely changed the extraction mechanism to co-extraction by BTBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2009) Key world energy statistics 2009. STEDI MEDIA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2009) General Conference GC(53)/INF/3 Fifty-third regular session Item 18 of the provisional agenda (GC(53)/1): Nuclear Technology Review 2009

  3. Madic C, Testard F, Hudson MJ, Liljenzin J-O, Christiansen B, Ferrando M, Facchini A, Geist A, Modolo G, Gonzalez-Espartero A, De Mendoza J (2004) PARTNEW new solvent extraction processes for minor actinides, Final Report CEA-R-6066

  4. Baldwin T, Chapman NA, Neall F (2008) Geological disposal options for high-level waste and spent fuel. Contractor report for the NDA (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority). http://www.nda.gov.uk/loader.cfm?csModule=security/getfile&pageid=20941. Accessed 24 May 2011

  5. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB) (2001) Feasibility studies—Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby, Summary report, TR-01-16

  6. Warin D (2007) J Nucl Sci Technol 44:410–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki S (2002) Prog Nucl Energy 40:343–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bond WD, Leuze RE (1976) In: Miller W, Lindner R (eds) Transplutonium elements. North Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam

  9. Madic C, Hudson M.J, Liljenzin J-O, Glatz J-P, Nannicini R, Facchini A, Kolarik Z, Odoj R (2000) New partitioning techniques for minor actinides, final report, NEWPART—EUR 19149. European Commission: Nuclear Science and Technology, Luxembourg

  10. Anderson HH, Asprey LB (1960) Solvent extraction process for plutonium. US Patent 2,924,506

  11. Madic C, Boullis B, Baron P, Testard R, Hudson MJ, Liljenzin J-O, Christiansen B, Ferrando M, Facchini A, Geist A, Modolo G, Espartero AG, De Mendoza J (2007) J Alloy Compd 444–445:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aneheim E, Ekberg C, Fermvik A, Foreman M, Retegan T, Skarnemark G (2010) Solvent Extr Ion Exch 28:437–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aneheim E, Ekberg C, Fermvik A, Foreman M, Grüner B, Hájkova Z, Kvicalová M (2011) Solvent Extr Ion Exch 29:157–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magill P, Pfennig G, Galy J (2006) Karlsruher Nuklidkarte, 7th edn. European Commission, Forschungszentrum

  15. Rider BF (1981) Compilation of Fission Product Yields, Vallecitos Nuclear Center, NEDO-1254-3(C)

  16. Cotton FA, Wilkinson G (1988) Advanced inorganic chemistry, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

  17. Macáŝek F, Kadrabová J (1979) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 51:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madic C, Lecomte M, Baron P, Boullis B (2002) C R Phys 3:797–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Choppin GR, Liljenzin J-O, Rydberg J (2002) Radiochemistry and nuclear chemistry, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  20. Boyd GE, Larson QV (1960) J Phys Chem 64:988–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Masoud MS, Soayed AA, Elkholany AS (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:1123–1130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jassim TN, Liljenzin J-O, Lundqvist R, Persson G (1984) Solvent Extr Ion Exch 2:405–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pitzer KS, Mayorga G (1973) J Phys Chem 77:2300–2308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh A, Freeman GR (1964) Can J Chem 42:1869–1876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mincher BJ, Modolo G, Mezyk SP (2009) Solvent Extr Ion Exch 27:1–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aneheim E, Ekberg C, Foreman M (2012) Hydrom. 115–116:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou X, Kong Y, Cao G, Zhang J (2012) J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 293

  28. Geier RG (1979) PUREX process solvent: literature review. Rockwell International Corp, Washington

  29. Swanson JL (1955) The stability of PUREX solvent to radiation and chemical attack—HW-38263. General Electric Co. Hanford Atomic Products Operation, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Blake CA Jr (1968) Solvent stability in nuclear fuel processing: evaluation of the literature, calculation of radiation dose, and effect of iodine and plutonium—ORNL-4212. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Swedish nuclear Fuel and waste management company (SKB) and the European Union FP7 project ACSEPT (project number: 211267) is acknowledged for the funding of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Nuclear Chemistry & Industrial Materials Recycling, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 4, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Emma Aneheim, Christian Ekberg, Alexander Littley, Elin Löfström-Engdahl & Gunnar Skarnemark

Authors
  1. Emma Aneheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Ekberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Littley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elin Löfström-Engdahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gunnar Skarnemark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Aneheim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aneheim, E., Ekberg, C., Littley, A. et al. Technetium chemistry in a novel group actinide extraction process. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296, 743–748 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1928-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1928-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation