Parameterization of 241Am and 230Th alpha particle energy in dependence on distance traveled in air

  • Mohammad Reza Rezaie
  • Ali Negarestani
  • Mehdi Sohrabi
  • Saeed Mohammadi
  • Dariush Afzali


A new method is introduced in this paper for calculating alpha particle energy versus traveled distance (APETD) in air as emitted from 241Am and 230Th sources as well as the alpha range versus its energy and its energy versus distance. This method is to derive the stated relevant equations and in particular to speed up the calculation of E(x) by a Monte-Carlo simulation. By a fitting procedure, an analytical formula E(x) was determined in terms of a series of powers of distance x. Then a randomly sampled x can be quickly transformed into a corresponding energy E. The APETD calculations were run on a Microsoft Windows 7 32 bit operating system with a maximum usable memory of 3 GB. The results of calculations for alphas of the above two radionuclides in air compared to those of others using a different method are in good agreement. The above stated equations as derived in this paper are presented and the process time for applying the new method has been greatly improved.


Alpha 241Am 230Th Stopping power Range Energy Distance Monte Carlo 


  1. 1.
    Nikezic D, Yu KN (2002) Incidence characteristics of alpha particles on detectors irradiated in a radon + progeny atmosphere. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res B 187:492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu KN, Yip CWY, Nikezic D, Ho JPY, Koo VSY (2003) Comparison among alpha-particle energy losses in air obtained from data of SRIM, ICRU and experiments. Appl Radiat Isot 59:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orschel D, Henniger J (2000) The program stoppow ± a useful tool for computation of energy loss and range of light ions in SSNTDs. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res B 171:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nikezic D, Yu KN (2007) Computer simulation of radon measurements with nuclear track detectors. In: Bianco SJ (ed) Computer physics research trends, vol 3. Nova Science Publishers, pp 119–150Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu B, Song Y, Wang L, Zhang Q, Li J, Wei K, Chen Y, Zhang L (2006) Electronic stopping powers of Ni, Gd and Pd metals for 19F ions at low energy. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:231–233Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bitao H, Yuhong L, Ximen C, Zhengmin L, Zhaoyuan L (2004) Energy-loss straggling of low energetic 16O ions in Co, Ni and Lu. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 262:489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kappel RJA, Keller G, Nickels RM, Leiner U (1997) Monte Carlo computation of the calibration factor for 222Rn measurements with electrochemically etched polycarbonate nuclear track detectors. Radiat Prot Dosim 71:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nikezic D, Haque AKMM, Yu KN (2002) Absorbed dose delivered by alpha particles calculated in cylindrical geometry. J Environ Radioact 60:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Reza Rezaie
    • 1
  • Ali Negarestani
    • 1
  • Mehdi Sohrabi
    • 2
  • Saeed Mohammadi
    • 3
  • Dariush Afzali
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKerman Graduate University of TechnologyKermanIran
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsPNU UniversityFariman (Mashad)Iran
  4. 4.International Center for Sciences&High Technologies and Environmental SciencesKermanIran

Personalised recommendations