How to calculate uncertainties of neutron flux parameters and uncertainties of analysis results in k0-NAA?

  • Marie Kubešová
  • Jan Kučera


A novel method is presented for the calculation of uncertainties of neutron flux parameters and element mass fractions and their uncertainties in k0-neutron activation analysis (k0-NAA) using the Kragten universally applicable spreadsheet technique. The results obtained are compared with other approaches for evaluation of uncertainties of the neutron flux parameters and element mass fractions, namely with the Kayzero for Windows, k0-IAEA and ERON programs. The differences observed are discussed in terms of how the above programs take into account various uncertainty sources and their correlations.


Neutron activation analysis k0 standardization Uncertainty Kragten approach 



This work was supported by projects GA ČR 202/09/0363, 202/09/H086, and SGS 10/212/OHK4/2T/14.


  1. 1.
    De Corte F (1987) The k0 standardization method, a move to the optimization of neutron activation analysis. University of Gent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Sluijs R (2003) KAYZERO/SOLCOI®, User’s manual for reactor neutron activation analysis using the k0 standardization method, ver. 5a, k0-Ware, Heerlen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rossbach M, Blaauw M, Bacchi MA, Lin X (2007) The k0-IAEA program. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 274:657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robouch P, Arana G, Eguskiza M, Pommé S, Extebarria N (2000) Uncertainty budget for k0-NAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 245:195–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kragten J (1994) Tutorial review. Calculating standard deviations and confidence intervals with a universally applicable spreadsheet technique. Analyst 119:2161–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Younes N, Robouch P (2003) A web tool for calculating k0-NAA uncertainties. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 257:665–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smodiš B, Bučar T (2006) Overall measurement uncertainty of k0-based neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 269:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bučar T, Smodiš B (2006) Assessment of the intrinsic uncertainty of the k0-based NAA. Nucl Instrum Methods A 564:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bučar T, Smodiš B (2008) Computer-assisted uncertainty assessment of k0-NAA measurement results. Nucl Instrum Methods A 595:647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smodiš B, Bučar T (2010) Comparison of k 0–NAA measurement results with calculated uncertainties for reference samples. Nucl Instrum Methods A 622:407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kubešová M, Kučera J (2010) Validation of k 0 standardization method in neutron activation analysis—The use of Kayzero for Windows programme at the nuclear physics institute, Řež. Nucl Instrum Methods A 622:403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kubešová M, Kučera J (2011) Validace metody k0 standardizace v neutronové aktivační analýze programem Kayzero for Windows. Chem Listy 105:261–268 in czechGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kubešová M, Kučera J (2011) Comparison of Kayzero for Windows and k0-IAEA software packages for k 0 standardization in neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods A 654:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Corte F, Simonits A (1994) Vade mecum for k0 users. DMS Research, GeleenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubešová M, Kučera J, Fikrle M (2011) A new monitor set for the determination of neutron flux parameters in short-time k0-NAA. Nucl Instrum Methods A 656:61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vermaercke P, Robouch P, Eguskiza M, De Corte F, Kennedy G, Smodiš B, Jačimović R, Yonezawa C, Matsue H, Lin X, Blaauw M, Kučera J (2006) Characterisation of synthetic multi-element standards (SMELS) used for the validation of k 0-NAA. Nucl Instrum Methods A 564:675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rossbach M, Blaauw M (2006) Progress in the k 0-IAEA program. Nucl Instrum Methods A 564:698–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Corte F, Simonits A (2003) Recommended nuclear data for use in the k0 standardization of neutron activation analysis. At Data Nucl Data Tables 85:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kolotov VP, De Corte F (2004) Compilation of k 0 and related data for NAA in the form of electronic database (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 76:1921–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blaauw M, Bode P, De Bruin M (1991) An alternative convention describing the (n, γ)-reaction rate suited for use in the k0-method of NAA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 152:435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Physics Institute ASCRŘežCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical EngineeringCzech Technical University in PraguePrague 1Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations