Comparison of list mode data acquisition and shift register measurements using the large epithermal neutron multiplicity counter (LEMC)

  • R. D. McElroyJr.
  • S. Croft


Neutron multiplicity analysis has been a valuable technique for safeguards measurements of plutonium oxide and mixed oxides. Historically, most of these measurements have been performed using shift register based electronics. The shift register data acquisition lacks certain flexibility because the basic coincidence parameters (e.g., pre-delay, gate width, and long delay) must be fixed prior to the start of the measurement and the values may potentially, therefore, be sub optimal. List mode or time stamped data acquisition records the arrival time of each pulse thereby preserving the history of the pulse stream and allowing analysis and reanalysis using software analogs to the shift register circuit with adjustable parameters. Until recently, the data rates encountered in the assay of modest amounts of plutonium using efficient multiplicity counters were beyond the capacity of readily available personal computers. The calibration of the large epithermal neutron multiplicity counter (LEMC) for assay of plutonium scrap materials is used as a vehicle to compare the performance of the multiplicity shift register and a commercially available list mode acquisition module.


Plutonium Shift Register List Mode Gate Width Coincidence Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. F. Briesmeister (Ed.), MCNP4C — A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System, Los Alamos Laboratory Report LA-13709-M. Version 4C, April 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. E. Stewart, H. O. Menlove, D. R. Mayo, W. H. Geist, L. A. Carrillo, G. D. Herrera, LA-13743-M, The Epithermal Neutron Multiplicity Counter Design and Performance Manual: More Rapid Plutonium and Uranium Inventory Verifications by Factors of 5–20, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. O. Menlove, J. Baca, M. S. Krick, K. E. Kroncke, D. G. Langner, Plutonium Scrap Multiplicity Counter Operation Manual, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-12479-M (ISPO-349), January 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Crossley, A. J. Fudge, J. W. A. Peckett, R. A. P. Wiltshire, A. J. Wood, The preparation and characterization of a plutonium oxide reference material for non-destructive analysis, AEA Technology, Harwell Laboratory, Fuel Services Report AEA-FS-00374(H), Mar. 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Maruyama, S. Ishikawa, D. R. Davidson, R. Mcelroy, H. O. Menlove, Initial and Operation Experience for MOX Scrap Measurement Using the PSMC, in: Proc. of the 38th Annual Meeting of the INMM (Institute of Nuclear Materials Management), July 20–24 1997, Phoenix, AZ, USA, July 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. E. Stewart, S. C. Bourret, M. S. Krick, M. R. Sweet, T. K. Li, A. Gorobets, New Shift-Register Electronics for Improved Precision of Neutron Coincidence and Multiplicity Assays of Plutonium and Uranium Mass, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-99-4927, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canberra IndustriesMeridenUSA

Personalised recommendations