Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

, Volume 275, Issue 2, pp 247–251 | Cite as

Effect of rhizosphere pH condition on cadmium movement in a soybean plant

  • T. Ohya
  • K. Tanoi
  • H. Iikura
  • H. Rai
  • T. M. Nakanishi
Article

Abstract

To study the effect of rhizosphere pH condition on the cadmium uptake movement, 109Cd, was applied as a radioisotope tracer to a soybean plant grown in a water culture at pH 4.5 or pH 6.5. The distribution of 109Cd in the soybean plant was observed radiographically with an imaging plate (IP). The amount of Cd transported from the root to the upper part of the plant at pH 4.5 was approximately two times higher than that at pH 6.5. However, the movement of Cd in the upper part of the plant was similar under both pH conditions. The distribution of Cd inside the internodes at pH 4.5 also showed similar pattern to that at pH 6.5, suggesting that once Cd reached to the vessel of the root, the movement of Cd was not dependent on rhizosphere pH conditions.

Keywords

Radiographic Image Soybean Plant Imaging Plate Xylem Vessel Soybean Seedling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. L. Chaney, J. A. Ryan, Y-M. Li, S. L. Brown, Dev. Plant Soil Sci., 85 (1999) 219.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO, Food Additive Series 46: Cadmium.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. P. Oliver, K. G. Tiller, A. M. Alston, G. D. Cozens, R. H. Merry, Aust. J. Soil Res., 36 (1998) 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. N. Iretskaya, S. H. Chien, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 30 (1999) 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Ohya, H. Iikura, K. Tanoi, H. Nishiyama, T. M. Nakanishi, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 264 (2005) 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. E. Salt, R. C. Prince, I. J. Pickering, I. Raskin, Plant Physiol., 109 (1995) 1427.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Shinmachi, Y. Kumanda, A. Noguchi, I. Hasegawa, Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr., 49 (2003) 355.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. R. Dunbar, M. J. Mclaughlin, R. J. Reid, J. Exp. Bot., 54 (2003) 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. J. Reid, K. R. Dunbar, M. J. Mclaughlin, Plant Cell Environ., 26 (2003) 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. M. Welch, J. J. Hart, W. A. Norvell, L. A. Sullivan, L. V. Kochian, Plant Soil, 208 (1999) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Chino, J. Soil Manure Japan, 44 (1973) 204 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Tanaka, S. Fujimaki, T. Fujiwara, T. Yoneyama, H. Hayashi, Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 49 (2003) 311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Ohya
    • 1
  • K. Tanoi
    • 1
  • H. Iikura
    • 1
  • H. Rai
    • 1
  • T. M. Nakanishi
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduated School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations