Journal of Polymer Research

, 25:44 | Cite as

An electrophoretic coating using a nanosilica modified polyacrylate resin

  • Hou-Hsein Chu
  • Ching- Yuan Chang
  • Bei-Huw Shen


Polyacrylate resins were prepared by a copolymerization of acrylates and methacrylates, in the presence (or absence) of a reactive nanosilica (RN), and polyacrylate resins were also modified by a half-blocked toluene diisocyanate (TDI). The RN, was prepared by a sol-gel process using tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and functionalized with 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate (MPS). The RN was determined to have an average particle diameter of around 10 nm. The resin was thus transformed into an emulsion and deposited on steel plate using an electrophoretic coating process. The deposited films were further cured in an oven, where the half-blocked TDI crosslinked to form networks. The presence of nanosilica in the deposited film enhances physical properties, such as abrasion resistance, impact resistance, and thermal stability.


Polyacrylate resin Electrophoretic coating Nanosilica Half-blocked diisocyanate Abrasion resistance 



This study was financially supported by the grant given by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, R. O. C. (grant number: NCSIST-497-V105 (104)). The reviewer offered precious comments, such as the suggestion of determining samples with nanoindentation, shedding some light on this study.


  1. 1.
    Sunkara HB, Jethmalani JM, Ford WT (1994). Chem Mater 6:362–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jethmalani JM, Ford WT (1996). Chem Mater 8:2138–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen WC, Lee SJ (2000). Polym J 32:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan CK, Peng SL, Chu IM, Ni SC (2001). Polymer 42:4189–4196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan CK, Chu IM (2001). Polymer 42:6823–6831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joseph R, Zhang S, Ford WT (1996). Macromolecules 29:1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jethmalani JM, Ford WT, Beaucage G (1997). Langmuir 13:3338–3344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jethmalani JM, Sunkara HB, Ford WT, Willoughby SL, Ackerson BJ (1997). Langmuir 13:2633–2639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebelmen JJ (1846). Ann 57:331Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chau JLH, Hseih C-C, Lin Y-M, Li AK (2008). Prog Org Coat 62:436–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu Y-Y, Chen CY, Chen W-C (2003). Polymer 44:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Odegard GM, Lai JS, Onaran K (2005) Characterization of viscoelastic properties of polymeric material through nanoindentation. Soc Exp Mech 45(2)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang D, Lee HK, Levon K, Mao J (1999). Polym J 35(5):867–878Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen K, Wilkie CA, Vyazovkin S (2007). J Phys Chem B 44:12685–12692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee JY, Su KE, Chan EP, Zhang Q, Emrick T, Crosby AJ (2007). Macromolecules 40(22):7755–7757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oh H, Green PF (2009). Nat Mater 8(2):139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bansal A, Yang H, Li C, Cho K, Benicewicz BC, Kumar SK (2005). Nat Mater 4(9):693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ash BJ, Siegel RW, Schadler LS (2004). J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 42(23):4371–4383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hou-Hsein Chu
    • 1
  • Ching- Yuan Chang
    • 1
  • Bei-Huw Shen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringFeng Chia UniversityTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and TechnologyTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations