Journal of Polymer Research

, 25:58 | Cite as

Properties and phase structure of melt-processed PLA/PMMA blends

  • Mauricio Gonzalez-Garzon
  • Shant Shahbikian
  • Michel A. Huneault


This study examines the rheological, mechanical and thermal behavior of Poly(lactic acid)/Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) blends and takes a look at the phase structure evolution during their melt processing. Semi-crystalline or amorphous PLA grades were combined with PMMA of different molecular weight to prepare the blends. The rheological properties and phase structure was first assessed using small-amplitude oscillatory shear experiments. The blends were injection molded into bars and characterized in terms of their tensile properties and of their dynamic mechanical behavior. Differential scanning calorimetry was also used to study the miscibility and crystallization behavior of prepared blends. Tensile properties of the blends nearly followed a linear mixing rule with no detrimental effect that could have been associated with an uncompatibilized interface. However, dynamic mechanical analysis and calorimetric experiments showed that some phase separation was present in the molded parts. Nevertheless, a single Tg was found if sufficient time was given in quiescent conditions to achieve miscibility. The Gordon-Taylor equation was used to assess the polymer interactions, suggesting that miscibility is the thermodynamically stable state. The ability of PLA to crystallize was strongly restricted by the presence of PMMA and little or no crystallinity development was possible in the blends with more than 30% of PMMA. Results showed an interesting potential of these blends from an application point of view, whether they are phase separated or not.


Polylactic acid Polymethyl methacrylate Miscibility Phase structure 



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial contribution of the Fond de recherche nature et technologie (FRQNT) of the province of Québec, Canada.


  1. 1.
    Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004) An overview of Polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci 4(9):835–864. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flory PJ (1953) Principles of polymer chemistry. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson KS, Hillmyer MA (2004) The influence of block copolymer microstructure on the toughness of compatibilized polylactide/polyethylene blends. Polymer 45(26):8809–8823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choudhary P, Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Unnikrishnan L (2011) Poly(L-lactide)/polypropylene blends: evaluation of mechanical, thermal, and morphological characteristics. J Appl Polym Sci 121(6):3223–3237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarazin P, Favis BD (2003) Morphology control in co-continuous poly (L-lactide)/polystyrene blends: a route towards highly structured and interconnected porosity in poly (L-lactide) materials. Biomacromolecules 4(6):1669–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gajria AM, Davé V, Gross RA, McCarthy SP (1996) Miscibility and biodegradability of blends of poly(lactic acid) and poly(vinyl acetate). Polymer 37(3):437–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huneault MA, Li H (2007) Morphology and properties of compatibilized polylactide/thermoplastic starch blends. Polymer 48(1):270–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Homklin R, Hongsriphan N (2013) Mechanical and thermal properties of PLA/PBS co-continuous blends adding nucleating agent. Energy Procedia 34:871–879. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iannace S, Ambrosio L, Huang S, Nicolais L (1994) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-co-(3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly-L-lactide blends: thermal and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 54(10):1525–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    La Mantia FP, Botta L, Morreale M, Scaffaro R (2012) Effect of small amounts of poly(lactic acid) on the recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) bottles. Polym Degrad Stab 97(1):21–24. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLauchlin AR, Ghita OR (2016) Studies on the thermal and mechanical behavior of PLA-PET blends. J Appl Polym Sci 133(43):n/a–n/a. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiljanen-Vainio M, Varpomaa P, Seppälä J, Törmälä P (1996) Modification of poly (L-lactides) by blending: mechanical and hydrolytic behavior. Macromol Chem Phys 197(4):1503–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harada M, Iida K, Okamoto K, Hayashi H, Hirano K (2008) Reactive compatibilization of biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone) blends with reactive processing agents. Polym Eng Sci 48(7):1359–1368. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang J-M, Chen H-L, You J-W, Hwang JC (1997) Miscibility and crystallization of poly (L-lactide)/poly (ethylene glycol) and poly (L-lactide)/poly (ε-caprolactone) blends. Polym J 29(8):657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sheth M, Kumar RA, Davé V, Gross RA, McCarthy SP (1997) Biodegradable polymer blends of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol). J Appl Polym Sci 66(8):1495–1505.<1495::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eguiburu JL, Iruin JJ, Fernandez-Berridi MJ, San Román J (1998) Blends of amorphous and crystalline polylactides with poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(methyl acrylate): a miscibility study. Polymer 39(26):6891–6897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang G, Zhang J, Wang S, Shen D (2003) Miscibility and phase structure of binary blends of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate). J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 41(1):23–30. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li S-H, Woo EM (2008) Effects of chain configuration on UCST behavior in blends of poly(L-lactic acid) with tactic poly(methyl methacrylate)s. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 46(21):2355–2369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li S-H, Woo EM (2008) Immiscibility–miscibility phase transitions in blends of poly(L-lactide) with poly(methyl methacrylate). Polym Int 57(11):1242–1251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shirahase T, Komatsu Y, Tominaga Y, Asai S, Sumita M (2006) Miscibility and hydrolytic degradation in alkaline solution of poly(l-lactide) and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends. Polymer 47(13):4839–4844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le K-P, Lehman R, Remmert J, Vanness K, Ward PML, Idol JD (2006) Multiphase blends from poly(L-lactide) and poly(methyl mathacrylate). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 17(1–2):121–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anakabe J, Zaldua Huici AM, Eceiza A, Arbelaiz A (2015) Melt blending of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate): thermal and mechanical properties and phase morphology characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 132(42):n/a–n/a. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samuel C, Raquez J-M, Dubois P (2013) PLLA/PMMA blends: a shear-induced miscibility with tunable morphologies and properties? Polymer 54(15):3931–3939. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nishi T, Wang T (1975) Melting point depression and kinetic effects of cooling on crystallization in poly (vinylidene fluoride)-poly (methyl methacrylate) mixtures. Macromolecules 8(6):909–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Canetti M, Cacciamani A, Bertini F (2014) Miscible blends of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate): morphology, structure, and thermal behavior. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 52(17):1168–1177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fischer EW, Sterzel HJ, Wegner G (1973) Investigation of the structure of solution grown crystals of lactide copolymers by means of chemical reactions. Kolloid-Zeitschrift und Zeitschrift für Polymere 251(11):980–990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roovers J, Toporowski PM (1992) Rheological study of miscible blends of 1,4-polybutadiene and 1,2-polybutadiene (63% 1,2). Macromolecules 25(3):1096–1102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    RunMing L, Wei Y, ChiXing Z (2007) Phase inversion and viscoelastic properties of phase-separated polymer blends. Polym Bull 59(4):545–554. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schnell M, Ziegler V, Wolf BA (2008) Evolution of viscosities and morphology for the two-phase system polyethylene oxide/poly(dimethylsiloxane). Rheol Acta 47(4):469–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu C, Wang J, He J (2002) Rheological and thermal properties of m-LLDPE blends with m-HDPE and LDPE. Polymer 43(13):3811–3818. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chopra D, Kontopoulou M, Vlassopoulos D, Hatzikiriakos GS (2002) Effect of maleic anhydride content on the rheology and phase behavior of poly(styrene-co -maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends. Rheol Acta 41(1):10–24. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarkhel G, Banerjee A, Bhattacharya P (2006) Rheological and mechanical properties of LDPE/HDPE blends. Polym Plast Technol Eng 45(6):713–718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lodge TP, McLeish TCB (2000) Self-concentrations and effective glass transition temperatures in polymer blends. Macromolecules 33(14):5278–5284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gordon M, Taylor JS (1952) Ideal copolymers and the second-order transitions of synthetic rubbers. i. Non-crystalline copolymers. J Appl Chem 2(9):493–500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jalali A, Huneault MA, Elkoun S (2016) Effect of thermal history on nucleation and crystallization of poly(lactic acid). J Mater Sci 51(16):7768–7779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saeidlou S, Huneault MA, Li H, Sammut P, Park CB (2012) Evidence of a dual network/spherulitic crystalline morphology in PLA stereocomplexes. Polymer 53(25):5816–5824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauricio Gonzalez-Garzon
    • 1
  • Shant Shahbikian
    • 1
  • Michel A. Huneault
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biotechnological EngineeringUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations