Journal of Polymer Research

, 25:53 | Cite as

Dynamic performance of an amorphous polymer composite under controlled loading of reduced graphene oxide based on entanglement of filler with polymer chains

  • Vinay Panwar
  • Kaushik Pal


This work recommends an optimum content of rGO required for effective improvement in thermomechanical properties of rGO/ABS composites. According to electrical conductivity measurements, the percolation threshold of rGO in ABS should be around 1 wt% but mechanical and rheological properties keep on increasing beyond this value. However, on the basis of tensile and damping properties, 1.5 wt% is the optimum content of rGO that should be used as reinforcement in thermoplastic polymer matrices. Composites having 1.5 wt% rGO in ABS have shown significant improvement in tensile strength, excellent degree of entanglement (specially at higher temperatures) and a very low value for C-factor. As observed in FESEM micrographs, the deterioration of properties with further increase in rGO content (2 wt% and above) should be due to non-uniform dispersion of filler inside the matrix. Moreover, the elliptical shape of Cole-Cole plots validates the compatibility of rGO as reinforcing filler in ABS matrix.


Graphene ABS Nanocomposites Percolation threshold Dynamic mechanical analysis 



One of the authors, Vinay Panwar, is thankful to Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India, for providing financial support to carry out the present work.

Supplementary material

10965_2017_1417_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1166 kb)


  1. 1.
    Chung C, Kim YK, Shin D, Ryoo SR, Hong BH, Min DH (2013) Biomedical applications of graphene and graphene oxide. Acc Chem Res 46:2211–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlierf A, Samori P, Palermo VJ (2014) Graphene-organic composites for electronics: optical and electronic interactions in vacuum, liquids and thin solid films. J Mater Chem C 2:3129–3143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Potts JR, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polym J 52:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2010) The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 39:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu J, Tang J, Gooding JJ (2012) Strategies for chemical modification of graphene and applications of chemically modified graphene. J Mater Chem 22:12435–12452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen D, Feng H, Li J (2012) Graphene oxide: Preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev 112:6027–6053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS (2012) Functionalization of graphene: Covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH (2010) Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 35:1350–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo S, Dong S (2011) Graphene nanosheet: Synthesis, molecular engineering, thin film, hybrids, and energy and analytical applications. Chem Soc Rev 40:2644–2672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tour JM (2014) Top-down versus bottom-up fabrication of graphene-based electronics. Chem Mater 26:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wei X, Li D, Jiang W, Gu Z, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sun Z (2015) 3D printable graphene composite. Sci Rep 5:11181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dul S, Fambri L, Pegoretti A (2016) Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Composites Part A 85:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Difallah BB, Kharrat M, Dammak M, Monteil G (2012) Mechanical and tribological response of ABS polymer matrix filled with graphite powder. Mater Des 34:782–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alaei MH, Mahajan P, Brieu M, Kondo D, SJA R, Kumar S, Bhatnagar N (2013) Effect of particle size on thermomechanical properties of particulate polymer composite. Iran Polym J 22:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Triantou MI, Stathi KI, Tarantili PA (2014) Rheological and thermomechanical properties of Graphene/ABS/PP nanocomposites. Int J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Metall Eng 8:967–972Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rejisha CP, Soundararajan S, Sivapatham N, Palanivelu K (2014) Effect of MWCNT on thermal, mechanical, and morphological properties of polybutylene terephthalate/polycarbonate blends. J Polym 157137:1–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Luna MS, Galizia M, Wojnarowicz J, Rosa R, Lojkowski W, Leonelli C, Acierno D, Filippone G (2014) Dispersing hydrophilic nanoparticles in hydrophobic polymers: HDPE/ZnO nanocomposites by a novel template-based approach. Express Polym Lett 8:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao W, Alemany LB, Ci L, Ajayan PM (2009) New insights into the structure and reduction of graphite oxide. Nat Chem 1:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vickery L, Patil AJ, Mann S (2009) Fabrication of graphene-polymer nanocomposites with higher-order three-dimensional architectures. Adv Mater 21:2180–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Becerril H, Mao J, Liu Z, Stoltenberg M, Bao Z, Chen Y (2008) Evaluation of solution-processed reduced graphene oxide films as transparent conductors. ACS Nano 2:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Waheed Q, Khan AN, Jan R (2016) Investigating the reinforcement effect of few layer graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotubes in acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. Polymer 97:496–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Attia NF, Abd El-Aal NS, Hassan MA (2016) Facile synthesis of graphene sheets decorated nanoparticles and flammability of their polymer nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab 126:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong N, Zhan J, Wang X, Stec AA, Hull TR, Ge H, Xing W, Song L, Hu Y (2014) Enhanced mechanical, thermal and flame retardant properties by combining graphene nanosheets and metal hydroxide nanorods for acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer composite. Composites Part A 64:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pour RH, Soheilmoghaddam M, Hassan A, Bourbigot S (2015) Flammability and thermal properties of polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene nanocomposites reinforced with multilayer graphene. Polym Degrad Stab 120:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bouhfid R, Arrakhiz FZ, Qaiss A (2016) Effect of graphene nanosheets on the mechanical, electrical, and rheological properties of polyamide 6/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends. Polym Compos 37:998–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pour RH, Hassan A, Soheilmoghaddam M, Bidsorkhi HC (2016) Mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of graphene reinforced polycarbonate/acrylonitrile butadiene styrene nanocomposites. Polym Compos 37:1633–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Panwar V, Chattree A, Pal K (2015) A new facile route for synthesizing of graphene oxide using mixture of sulphuric-nitric-phosphoric acids as intercalating agent. Phys E 73:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khanam PN, Ponnamma D, AL-Madeed MA (2015) Chapter 2, Electrical properties of graphene polymer nanocomposites. In: Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, KimJ, Thomas S (eds) Graphene-based Polymer Nanocomposites in Electronics, Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham p 25–47Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nan CW (1993) Physics of inhomogeneous inorganic materials. Prog Mater Sci 37:1–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    He L, Tjong SC (2013) Low percolation threshold of graphene/polymer composites prepared by solvothermal reduction of graphene oxide in the polymer solution. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levon K, Margolina A, Patashinsky AZ (1993) Multiple percolation in conducting polymer blends. Macromolecules 26:4061–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pandey AK, Kumar R, Kachhavah VS, Kar KK (2016) Mechanical and thermal behaviours of graphite flake-reinforced acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites and their correlation with entanglement density, adhesion, reinforcement and C factor. RSC Adv 6:50559–50571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jyoti J, Singh BP, Arya AK, Dhakate SR (2016) Dynamic mechanical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced ABS composites and their correlation with entanglement density, adhesion, reinforcement and C factor. RSC Adv 6:3997–4006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Landel RF, Nielsen LE (1993) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chandra R, Singh SP, Gupta K (1999) Damping studies in fiber-reinforced composites - a review. Compos Struct 46:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu S (1990) Chain structure, phase morphology, and toughness relationships in polymers and blends. Polym Eng Sci 30:753–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations