Synthesis and characterization of rubbery/glassy blend membranes for CO2/CH4 gas separation
- 441 Downloads
A series of blend membranes made from the rubbery polyether block amide (Pebax®1657) and a glassy polymer, polyethersulfone (PES) or Matrimid 5218, were fabricated by solution casting with different ratios (10–40 %), in order to combine high permeability of the former with high selectivity of the latter polymer for CO2/CH4 gas separation. The membranes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and stress–strain tests. These blend membranes showed two distinct T g s, indicating their immiscible nature as confirmed by SEM images. However, weak intermolecular interaction between polymers, as illustrated by the FTIR results, corresponds to some degree to their compatibility and improved mechanical strength, compared to the pure Pebax®. TGA analysis revealed that addition of glassy polymer improved membranes’ thermal stability. Effect of feed pressure on membrane separation, investigated by three different pressures (4, 8, and 12 bar), indicated increased permeability for higher pressures for both CO2 and CH4. Gas separation tests also pointed to improved separation properties of the blend membranes compared to those of the neat polymers, prepared the same way.
KeywordsBlends Miscibility Membranes Morphology High-performance polymers
The authors would like to thank both the University of Kashan and Iranian Research Institute of Petroleum Industries for providing supports and provisions needed for this work.
- 3.Baker RW (2000) Membrane technology and applications. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chung TS (1996) A review of microporous composite polymeric membrane technology for air. Polym Polym Compos 4:269–283Google Scholar
- 9.Thomas S, Grohens Y, Jyotishkumar P (2015) Characterization of polymer blends: miscibility, morphology, and interfaces, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- 10.Salleh WNW, Ismail AF (2015) Carbon membranes for gas separation processes: recent progress and future perspective. J Membr Sci Res 1:2–15Google Scholar
- 11.White JL, Bumm SH (2011) In: Isayev AI, Palsule S (eds) Polymer blend compounding and processing. Encyclopedia of polymer blends. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kaniappan K, Latha S (2011) Certain investigations on the formulation and characterization of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends. Int J ChemTech Res 3(2):708–717Google Scholar
- 31.Silverstein RM, Webster FX (2004) Spectroscopic identification of organic compounds. John Wiley & Sons, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- 35.Qu P, Tang H, Gao Y, Zhang L-p, Wang S (2010) Polyethersulfone composite membrane blended with cellulose fibrils. BioResources 5(4):2323–2336Google Scholar
- 36.Kusworo TD, Ismail AF, Mustafa A, Li K (2008) The effect of type zeolite on the gas transport properties of polyimide-based mixed matrix membranes. Reaktor 12(2):68–77Google Scholar
- 39.Bakhtiari O, Mosleh S, Khosravi T, Mohammadi T (2011) Preparation, characterization and gas permeation of polyimide mixed matrix membranes. J Membra Sci Technol 1 (1)Google Scholar