Journal of Polymer Research

, 23:17 | Cite as

Largely enhanced effective porosity of uniaxial stretched polypropylene membrane achieved by pore-forming agent

  • Jian Dai
  • Chang-ming Liu
  • Jing-hui Yang
  • Yong Wang
  • Chao-liang Zhang
  • Zuo-wan Zhou
Original Paper


A simple method for enhancing the effective porosity of the uniaxial stretched polypropylene (PP) membrane through the introduction of a pore-forming agent polyoxyethyleneoctylphenyl-10 (OP-10) was developed. The PP membrane was prepared through melt-compounding, compression molding and subsequent uniaxial tensile process. The microstructures of as-prepared samples and pore morphologies of the stretched membranes were investigated. The effective porosity was measured through soaking method using ethanol as the soaking liquid. The results showed that many initial pores were successfully introduced into the samples with the addition of OP-10. OP-10 leaded to the decrease of the crystallization temperature, melting temperature and crystallinity of PP samples as obtained. The effective porosity increased with increasing tensile strain, and largely enhanced effective porosity was achieved for the samples with the relatively high content of OP-10. This work provides an effective method for the preparation of the stretched PP membrane with high effective porosity by combining the incorporation of initial pores with the uniaxial stretching.


Stretched PP membrane Pore-forming agent Effective porosity 



Authors express their sincere thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51173151) and Distinguished Young Scholars Foundation of Sichuan (2012JQ0057) for financial support. Dr. Yong Wang greatly appreciated Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany) for providing the chance to carry out the research in Germany. Prof. Manfred Stamm and Mr. Michael Göbel (Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e. V ., Germany) were appreciated for their assistance when using SEM.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.


  1. 1.
    Gao Y, Jubera AMS, Marinas BJ, Moore JS (2013) Nanofiltration membranes with modified active layer using aromatic polyamide dendrimers. Adv Funct Mater 23:598–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rijn P, Tutus M, Kathrein C, Mougin NC, Park H, Hein C, Schürings MP (2014) Ultra‐Thin Self‐Assembled Protein‐Polymer Membranes: A New Pore Forming Strategy. Adv Funct Mater 24:6762–6770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho WK, Choi IS (2008) Fabrication of hairy polymeric films inspired by geckos: wetting and high adhesion properties. Adv Funct Mater 18:1089–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gudjonsdottir M, Palsson H, Eliasson J, Saevarsdottir G (2015) Calculation of relative permeabilities of water and steam from laboratory measurements. Geothermics 53:396–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mattia D, Leese H, Lee KP (2015) Carbon nanotube membranes: from flow enhancement to permeability. J Membr Sci 475:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu SC, Zheng YP, Zhou Q, Shuai S (2012) Facile modification of polypropylene hollow fiber microfiltration membranes for nanofiltration. Desalination 298:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang C, Xiao CF, Huang QL, Pan J (2015) A study on structure and properties of poly(p –phenylene terephthamide) hybrid porous membranes. J Membr Sci 474:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Offord GT, Armstrong SR, Freeman BD, Baer E, Hiltner A, Paul DR (2013) Influence of processing strategies on porosity and permeability of β- nucleated isotactic polypropylene stretched films. Polymer 54:2796–2807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Villaluenga JPG, Khayet M, López-Manchado MA, Valentin JL, Seoane B, Mengual JI (2007) Gas transport properties of polypropylene/clay composite. Eur Polym J 43:1132–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Y, Yu SN, Wu H, Li YF, Wang SF, Tian ZZ, Jiang ZY (2014) High permeability hydrogel membranes of chitosan/polyether-block-amide blends for CO2. J Membr Sci 469:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuan F, Wang Z, Li SC (2012) Formation–structure–performance correlation of thin film composite membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization for gas separation. J Membr Sci 421–422:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karger-Kocsis J, Varga J, Ehrenstein GW (1997) Comparsion of the fracture and failure behavior of injection moulded alpha-and beta-polypropylene in high speed three-point bending tests. J Appl Polym Sci 64:2057–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuyama H, OIkafuji H, Maki T, Teramoto M, Tsujioka N (2002) Membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation in polypropylene/polybutene/diluent system. J Appl Polym Sci 84:1701–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tang N, Jia Q, Zhang HJ, Li JJ, Cao S (2010) Preparation and morphological characterization of narrow pore size distributed polypropylene hydrophobic membranes for vacuum membrane distillation via thermally induced phase separation. Desalination 256:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farhad S, Ajji A, Carreau PJ (2007) Analysis of microporous membranes obtained from polypropylene films by stretching. J Membr Sci 292:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tabatabaei SH, Carreau PJ, Ajji A (2009) Microporous membranes obtained from PP/HDPE multilayer films by stretching. J Membr Sci 345:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feng C, Kimura Y (1996) Structure and gas permeability of microporous films prepared by biaxial drawing of β-form polypropylene. Polymer 37:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Offord GT, Armstrong SR, Freeman BD, Baer E, Hiltner A, Swinnea JS, Paul DR (2013) Porosity enhance ment in b nucleated isotactic polypropylene stretchedfilms by thermal annealing. Polymer 54:2577–2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matsuyama H, Maki T, Teramoto M, Asano K (2002) Effect of polypropylene molecular weight on porous membrane formation by thermally induced phase separation. J Membr Sci 204:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tabatabaei SH, Carreau PJ, Ajji A (2009) Effect of processing on the crystalline orientation, morphology, and mechanical properties of polypropylene cast films and microporous membrane formation. Polymer 50:4228–4240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao W, Su YL, Li C, Shi Q, Ning X, Jiang ZY (2008) Fabrication of antifouling polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes using Pluronic F127 as both surface modifier and pore-forming agent. J Membr Sci 318:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meier MM, Kanis LA, Soldi V (2004) Characterization and drug-permeation profiles of microporous and dense cellulose acetate membranes: influence of plasticizer and pore forming agent. Int J Pharm 278:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bashford CL, Alder GM, Graham JM (1988) Ion modulation of membrane permeability: effect of cations on intact cells and on cells and phospholipid bilayers treated with pore-forming agents. J Membr Biol 103:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang Y, Kinloch A (1992) The toughness of epoxy polymers containing microvoids. Polymer 33:1330–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1995) Compressive properties of Nanoclay/epoxy nanocomposites. Polymer 36:4883–4885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen JW, Dai J, Yang JH, Zhang N, Huang T, Wang Y (2014) Amplified toughening effect of annealing on isotactic polypropylene realized by introducing microvoids. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:4679–4688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li JX, Cheung WL, Jia D (1999) Functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with pimelic acid molecules: effect of linkage on β-crystal formation in an isotactic polypropylene (iPP) matrix. Polymer 40:1219–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu SJ, Zhou CX, Yu W (2011) Phase separation and structure control in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene microprous membrane. J Membr Sci 379:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chu F, Yamaoka T, Ide H, Kimura Y (1994) Microvoid formation process during the plastic deformation of β-form polypropylene. Polymer 35:3442–3448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kotek J, Raab M, Baldrian J, Grellmann W (2002) The effect of specific β-nucleation on morphology and mechanical behavior of isotactic polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 85:1174–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liang GG, Cook WD, Tcharkhtchi A, Sautereau H (2011) Epoxy as a reactive plasticizer for improving polycarbonate processibility. Eur Polym J 47:1578–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pawlak A, Rozanski A, Galeski A (2013) Thermovision studies of plastic deformation and cavitation in polypropylene. Mech Mater 67:104–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang XC, Butler MF, Cameron RE (2000) The ductile–brittle transition of irradiated isotactic polypropylene studied using simultaneous small angle X-ray scattering and tensile deformation. Polymer 41:3797–3807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rozanski A, Galeski A, Debowska M (2011) Initiation of cavitation of polypropylene during tensile drawing. Macromolecules 44:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lei CH, Wu SQ, Xu RJ, Cai Q, Hu B, Peng XL, Shi WQ (2013) Formation of stable crystalline connecting bridges during the fabrication of polypropylene microporous membrane. Polym Bull 70:1353–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jian Dai
    • 1
  • Chang-ming Liu
    • 1
  • Jing-hui Yang
    • 1
  • Yong Wang
    • 1
  • Chao-liang Zhang
    • 2
  • Zuo-wan Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science & EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Oral DiseasesSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations