Advertisement

Unimodal and bimodal networks of physically crosslinked polyborodimethylsiloxane: viscoelastic and equibiaxial extension behaviors

  • Nispa Seetapan
  • Asira Fuongfuchat
  • Doungporn Sirikittikul
  • Nattawut Limparyoon
Original Paper

Abstract

Unimodal and bimodal networks of physically crosslinked polyborodimethylsiloxane (PBDMS) were prepared by end-linking hydroxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with boric acid. Their viscoelastic and equibiaxial extension behaviors were investigated. Three PDMS precursors with different number-average molecular weight (\( {\overline{M}}_n \)) were employed, of which the shortest chain had \( {\overline{M}}_n \) lower than the entanglement molecular weight. Bimodal networks were prepared from the mixture of the shortest and the longer PDMS chains. Linear viscoelastic behavior of unimodal network of the shortest chain gave the best fit to the Maxwell model with single relaxation time of 1.59 s, and equilibrium elastic modulus (G e ) of the network was well-explained by phantom network model. The unimodal networks from the other two long chain precursors, however, showed multi-relaxation behavior with the longest relaxation times of 1.00–1.26 s. Moreover, their G e was close to affine model and deviated from the phantom model with trapped entanglement factors of ~ 0.13. The bimodal networks with high mole percentage of short chains gave G e values approximate to the predicted values of phantom model. Such bimodal networks showed an extremely large increase in modulus at high biaxial extension, attributed by the limited extensibilities of short chains and un-relaxed crosslinked junctions.

Keywords

Bimodal networks Physically crosslinked polyborodimethylsiloxane Trapped entanglement Viscoelasticity Equibiaxial extension 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Metal and Materials Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand (Project No. MT-B-53-POL-07-485-I).

References

  1. 1.
    Mark JE (1982) The use of model polymer networks to elucidate molecular aspects of rubberlike elasticity. Adv Polym Sci 44:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mark JE (2003) Some recent theory, experiments, and simulations on rubberlike elasticity. J Phys Chem B 107:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Queslel JP, Mark JE (1984) Molecular interpretation of the moduli of elastomeric polymer networks of known structure. Adv Polym Sci 65:137–176Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Urayama K, Kawamura T, Kohjiya S (2009) Structure-mechanical property correlations of model siloxane elastomers with controlled network topology. Polymer 50:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang S, Mark JE (1992) Unimodal and bimodal networks of poly(dimethyl-siloxane) in pure shear. J Polymer Sci, Part B: Polymer Phys 30:801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Genesky GD, Cohen C (2010) Toughness and fracture energy of PDMS bimodal and trimodal networks with widely separated precursor molar masses. Polymer 51:4152–4159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharf MA, Mark JE, Alshamsi AS (1996) Moduli of elastomeric networks prepared by tetrafunctionally endlinking vinyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) chains at low temperature. Polym J 28:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goertz MP, Zhu XY, Houston JE (2009) Temperature dependent relaxation of a “solid-liquid”. J Polymer Sci, Part B: Polymer Phys 47:1285–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hou A, Si C, Zhou Y (2009) Self-assembly of the polysiloxane modified with cationic and perfluorocarbon groups on the polyester surface and its effect on the color shade of the dyed polyester. J Polym Res 16:687–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang Y, Du L, Zhang J, Feng S (2011) A thermosensitive supramolecular aggregation from linear telechelic polydimethylsiloxane with self-assembly units. J Polym Res 18:1635–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langley NR (1968) Elastically effective strand density in polymer networks. Macromolecules 1:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chatraei SH, Macosko CW, Winter HH (1981) Lubricated squeezing flow: a new biaxial extensional rheometer. J Rheol 25:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soskey PR, Winter HH (1985) Equibiaxial extension of two polymer melts: polystyrene and low density polyethylene. J Rheol 29:493–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi M, Isaki T, Takigawa T, Masuda T (1993) Measurement of biaxial and uniaxial extensional flow behavior of polymer melts at constant strain rates. J Rheol 37:827–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song Y, Zheng Q (2008) Network formation in glycerol plasticized wheat gluten as viewed by extensional deformation and stress relaxation: final conclusions. Food Hydrocolloids 22:647–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fried JR (1995) Polymer science and technology. Prentice-Hall International, Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gottlieb M, Macosko CW, Benjamin GS, Meyers KO, Merrill EW (1981) Equilibrium modulus of model poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks. Macromolecules 14:1039–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Urayama K, Yokoyama K, Kohjiya S (2001) Viscoelastic relaxation of guest linear poly(dimethylsiloxane) in end-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks. Macromolecules 34:4513–4518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kavanagh GM, Ross-Murphy SB (1998) Rheological characterisation of polymer gels. Prog Polym Sci 23:533–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pellens L, Ahn KH, Lee SJ, Mewis J (2004) Evaluation of a transient network model for telechelic associative polymers. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 121:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patel SK, Malone S, Cohen C, Gillmor JR, Colby RH (1992) Elastic modulus and equilibrium swelling of poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks. Macromolecules 25:5241–5251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu C, He J, Ruymbeke E, Keunings R, Bailly C (2006) Evaluation of different methods for the determination of the plateau modulus and the entanglement molecular weight. Polymer 47:4461–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahashi H, Shibyama M, Fujisawa H, Noruma S (1995) Equilibrium swelling and small-angle neutron-scattering study on end-linked poly(tetrahydrofuran) networks. Macromolecules 28:8824–8828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Treloar LRG (2005) The physics of rubber elasticity, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rietjens M, Steenbergen PA (2005) Crosslinking mechanism of boric acid with diols revisited. Eur J Inorg Chem 2005:1162–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sottos N, White S, Bond I (2007) Introduction: self-healing polymers and composites. J R Soc Interface 4:347–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cotton FA, Wilkinson G (1980) Advanced inorganic chemistry, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klüppel M (1992) Trapped entanglements in polymer networks and their influence on the stress-strain behaviour up to large extensions. Prog Collied Polym Sci 90:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Flory PJ (1977) Theory of elasticity of polymer networks. The effect of local constraints on junctions. J Chem Phys 66:5720–5729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dossin LM, Graessley WW (1979) Rubber elasticity of well-characterized polybutadiene networks. Macromolecules 12:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Langley NR, Ferry JD (1968) Dynamic mechanical properties of cross-linked rubbers. VI. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks. Macromolecules 1:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanaka F, Edward SF (1992) Viscoelastic properties of physically cross-linked networks. Transient network theory. Macromolecules 25:1516–1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Genesky GD, Aguilera-Mercado BM, Bhawe DM, Escobedo FA, Cohen C (2008) Experiments and simulations: enhanced mechanical properties of end-linked bimodal elastomers. Macromolecules 41:8231–8241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Llorente MA, Andrady AL, Mark JE (1981) Model networks of end-linked polydimethylsiloxane chains. XI. Use of very short network chains to improve ultimate properties. J Polymer Sci, Part B: Polymer Phys 19:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mark J, Erman B (1988) Rubberlike elasticity: A molecular primer. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Andrady AL, Llorente MA, Mark JE (1980) Model networks of end-linked polydimethylsiloxane chains. VII. Networks designed to demonstrate non-Gaussian effects related to limited chain extensibility. J Chem Phys 72:2282–2290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sakrak G, Bahar I, Erman B (1994) Computer simulations of two-dimensional trifunctional bimodal networks. Macromol Theory Simul 3:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nispa Seetapan
    • 1
  • Asira Fuongfuchat
    • 1
  • Doungporn Sirikittikul
    • 1
  • Nattawut Limparyoon
    • 1
  1. 1.National Metal and Materials Technology CenterNational Science and Technology Development AgencyPathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations