Journal of Polymer Research

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 2087–2092 | Cite as

Investigation of interfacial slip in immiscible polymer blends

  • Younggon Son
Original Paper


In this study, we investigated an interfacial slip phenomenon occurring in immiscible polymer blends. We chose a binary polymer blend in which the interaction parameter, χ, between the component polymers is high, and thus the interface is thin and entanglement is weak. It was observed that the negative viscosity deviation (NVD) of the blends is large, which might be attributable to interfacial slippage between the interfaces. It was also observed that incorporation of a compatibilizer in the blends significantly reduced the NVD, via suppression of interfacial slip due to increased interfacial strength. We carried out a specially designed experiment to verify that interfacial slip is indeed responsible for the NVD. We prepared several blend samples having different phase sizes ranging from 50 ∼ 5 μm, and evaluated the shear stress vs. shear rate relationships of the samples using a capillary rheometer. We observed that the viscosities of the samples decreased as the phase sizes decreased, which is strong evidence of the occurrence of interfacial slip.


Interfacial slip Immiscible polymer blend Negative viscosity deviation 



This work was supported by a grant from the Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (The Regional Core Research Program/Zero Energy Green Village Technology Center).


  1. 1.
    Chan CM, Feng J (1997) Mechanisms for viscosity reduction of polymer blends: blends of fluoroelastomer and high density polyethylene. J Rheol 41:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen A, Schroeder JR (1990) Morphological analysis of the viscosity anomaly for PP/PS blends. J Rheol 34:685–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole PJ, Macosko CW (2000) Polymer–polymer adhesion in melt processed layered structures. J Plast Film Sheeting 16:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goveas JL, Fredrickson PG (1998) Apparent slip at a polymer–polymer interfaces. Eur Phys J B 2:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furukawa H (1989) Sliding along the interface of strongly segregated polymer melts. Phys Rev A 40:6403–6406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bingham EC (1992) Fluidity and Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin CC (1979) A mathematical model for viscosity in capillary extrusion of two-component polyblends. Polym J 11:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Utracki LA (1983) Melt flow of polymer blends. Polym Eng Sci 23:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Utracki LA, Kamal MR (1982) Melt rheology of polymer blends. Polym Eng Sci 22:96–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Utracki LA (1991) Two-phase polymer systems. Hanser Verlag, MacrochenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Palierne JP (1990) Linear rheology of viscoelastic emulsions with interfacial tension. Rheol Acta 29:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doi M, Ohta T (1991) Dynamics and rheology of complex interfaces. J Chem Phys 15:1242–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee HM, Park OO (1994) Rheology and dynamics of immiscible polymer blends. J Rheol 38:1405–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lam YC, Jiang L, Yue CY, Tam KC, Li L (2003) Interfacial Slip between polymer Melts Studied by Confocal Microscopy and Rheological Measurements Journal of Rheology. J Rheol 47:795–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao R, Macosko CW (2002) Slip at polymer–polymer interfaces: Rheological measurements on coextruded multilayers. J Rheol 46:145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee H, Kim DH, Son Y (2006) Anomalous Rheological Behavior of Polyethylene Melts in the Gross Melt Fracture Regime in the Capillary Extrusion. Polymer 47:3929–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Gennes PG (1992) Mechanical properties of polymer interfaces. In: Sanchez IC (ed) Physics of Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces. Butterworth-Heinemann, MA, pp 55–71Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brochard F, de Gennes PG, Troian S (1990) Slippage at the interface between two slightly incompatible polymers. C R Acad Sci II Mec Phys Chim Sci Terre Univers 310:1169–1173Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu S (1982) Polymer interface and adhesionGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levitt L, Macosko CW (1999) Shearing of polymer drops with interface modification. Macromolecules 32:6270–6277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Germain Y, Ernest B, Genelot O, Dhamani L (1994) Rheological and morphological analysis of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide blends. J Rheol 38:681–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiou KC, Chang FC (2000) Reactive compatibilization of polyamide-6 (PA 6)/polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) blends by a multifunctional epoxy resin. J Polym Sci:B 38:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han MS, Lim BH, Jung HC, Hyun JC, Kim SR, Kim WN (2001) Reactive blends of poly(butylene terephthalate)/polyamide-6 with ethylene glycidyl methacrylate. Korea Aust Rheol J 13:169–177Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    George J, Ramamurthy K, Varughese KT, Thomas S (2000) Melt rheology and morphology of thermoplastic elastomers from polyethylene/nitrile-rubber blends: The effect of blend ratio, reactive compatibilization, and dynamic vulcanization. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 38:1104–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iza M, Bousmina M, Jerome R (2001) Rheology of compatibilized immiscible viscoelastic polymer blends. Rheol Acta 40:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riemann RE, Cantow HJ, Friedrich C (1997) Interpretation of a new interface-governed relaxation process in compatibilized polymer. Macromolecules 30:5476–5484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor GI (1932) The Viscosity of a Fluid Containing Small Drops of Another Fluid. Proc Roy Soc A138:41–48Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, College of EngineeringKongju National UniversityCheonanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations