Skip to main content
Log in

Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vast majority of adolescents recognize that bullying is morally wrong, yet bullying remains a problem in secondary schools, indicating young people may disengage from their moral values to engage in bullying. But it is unclear whether the same mechanisms enabling moral disengagement are active for bully/victims (who both bully and are bullied) as for pure bullies (who are not targets of bullying). This study tested the hypotheses that mechanisms of moral disengagement, including blaming the victim and minimizing the impact of bullying, may operate differently in bully/victims compared to pure bullies. From a sample of 1895 students from grades 7–9 (50.6% female; 83.4% from English speaking homes), 1870 provided self-reports on bullying involvement and mechanisms of moral disengagement associated with bullying. Two cut-offs were compared for bullying involvement (as perpetrator and as target of bullying) during the previous school term: a conservative cut-off (every few weeks or more often) and a liberal cut-off (once-or-twice). Using the conservative cut-off, both pure bullies and bully/victims enlisted moral disengagement mechanisms to justify bullying more than did uninvolved students and pure victims, with no significant difference in scores on any of the moral disengagement scales between pure bullies and bully/victims. For the liberal cut-off, bully/victims reported lower overall moral disengagement scores than did pure bullies, and specifically less distortion of consequences, diffusion of responsibility, and euphemistic labeling. This study advances bullying research by extending the role of moral disengagement in bullying episodes beyond pure bullies to victims, both pure victims and bully/victims. Examination of specific moral disengagement mechanisms and the extent of involvement in bullying enabled a more nuanced differentiation between the bullying groups. These results will inform future interventions aimed at reducing the use of moral disengagement mechanisms that sustain bullying and victimization. Targeted interventions are needed to challenge specific moral disengagement mechanisms from the perspectives of pure bullies and bully/victims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Authors’ Contributions

K.R. participated in the design and coordination of the study and drafted the manuscript; T.S. participated in in the design and coordination of the study, performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript; K.B., R.T., and C.S. helped to draft the manuscript; D.C. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted as part of the Beyond Bullying: Positive Change for All study, which was funded in whole by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Project 1046086). DC’s contribution to this article was supported by NHMRC Research Fellowship GNT 1119339.

Data Sharing and Declaration

This manuscript’s data will not be deposited, per request by the relevant Department of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin C. Runions.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Western Australia Human Ethics review board (RA/4/1/6934), and by the Department of Education of Western Australia, and Catholic Education Western Australia. The research was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and in compliance with the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007).

Informed Consent

All participants were provided with information documentation and consent was required and was obtained for all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Runions, K.C., Shaw, T., Bussey, K. et al. Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms. J Youth Adolescence 48, 1835–1848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01067-2

Keywords

Navigation