Different Kinds of Lonely: Dimensions of Isolation and Substance Use in Adolescence

  • Molly Copeland
  • Jacob C. Fisher
  • James Moody
  • Mark E. Feinberg
Empirical Research
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Social isolation is broadly associated with poor mental health and risky behaviors in adolescence, a time when peers are critical for healthy development. However, expectations for isolates’ substance use remain unclear. Isolation in adolescence may signal deviant attitudes or spur self-medication, resulting in higher substance use. Conversely, isolates may lack access to substances, leading to lower use. Although treated as a homogeneous social condition for teens in much research, isolation represents a multifaceted experience with structurally distinct network components that present different risks for substance use. This study decomposes isolation into conceptually distinct dimensions that are then interacted to create a systematic typology of isolation subtypes representing different positions in the social space of the school. Each isolated position’s association with cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use is tested among 9th grade students (n = 10,310, 59% female, 83% white) using cross-sectional data from the PROSPER study. Different dimensions of isolation relate to substance use in distinct ways: unliked isolation is associated with lower alcohol use, whereas disengagement and outside orientation are linked to higher use of all three substances. Specifically, disengagement presents risks for cigarette and marijuana use among boys, and outside orientation is associated with cigarette use for girls. Overall, the adolescents disengaged from their school network who also identify close friends outside their grade are at greatest risk for substance use. This study indicates the importance of considering the distinct social positions of isolation to understand risks for both substance use and social isolation in adolescence.

Keywords

Social Isolation Adolescence Social Networks Substance Use 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of working groups at PSU and Duke University for their helpful comments. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of study participants and families and the PROSPER staff to the success of this project.

Authors’ Contributions

M.C. wrote the manuscript and contributed to the study design; J.F. conducted analyses and participated in data interpretation and drafting; JM generated the networks; J.M. and M.E.F. conceived of the study and participated in design and revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Grants from the W.T. Grant Foundation (8316), National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA018225), National Science Foundation (1535370), the National Institutes of Health (UL1-TR002240), and National Institute of Child Health and Development (R24-HD041025) supported this research. The analyses used data from PROSPER, a project directed by R. L. Spoth, funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1-DA013709) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA14702).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The procurement of the data required for this study was approved by the Iowa State University and Pennsylvania State University institutional review boards

Informed Consent

All youth and families were informed about and consented to participate in this project.

References

  1. Ali, M. M., Amialchuk, A., & Nikaj, S. (2014). Alcohol consumption and social network ties among adolescents: evidence from add health. Addictive Behaviors, 39(5), 918–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. An, W., & Mcconnell, W. R. (2015). The origins of asymmetric ties in friendship networks: from status differential to self-perceived centrality. Network Science, 3(2), 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Friendship networks and social status. Network Science, 1(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2010). Alcohol use and popularity: social payoffs from conforming to peers’ behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004). Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 89–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Branje, S. J. T., Frijns, T., Finkenauer, C., Engels, R., & Meeus., W. (2007). You are my best friend: commitment and stability in adolescents’ same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 14(4), 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Choi, H. J., & Smith., R. A. (2013). Members, isolates, and liaisons: meta-analysis of adolescents’ network positions and their smoking behavior. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(8), 612–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society: the social life of the teenager and its impact on education. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, S. H., Bauermeister, J. A., Gordon-Messer, D., & Zimmerman., M. A. (2013). Online network influences on emerging adults’ alcohol and drug use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(11), 1674–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Copeland, M., Bartlett, B., & Fisher, J. C. (2017). Dynamic associations of network isolation and smoking behavior. Network Science, 5(3), 257–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cotterell, J. (2007). Social Networks in Youth & Adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Crosnoe, R. (2011). Fitting in, standing out. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 464–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de la Haye, K., Harold, D. G., Pollard, M. S., Kennedy, D. P., & Tucker, J. S. (2014). Befriending risky peers: factors driving adolescents’ selection of friends with similar marijuana use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(10), 1914–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., & Yoerger., K. (1999). Middle childhood antecedents to progressions in male adolescent substance use: an ecological analysis of risk and protection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(2), 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douvan, E. (1983). Commentary: theoretical perspectives on peer association. In JoyceLevy Epstein & Nancy Karweit eds, Friends in school: patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 63–69). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ennett, S. T., Karl, E. B., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., & Cai, L. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ennett, S. T., Faris, R., Hipp, J., Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., & Cai, L. (2008). Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. Prevention Science, 9(2), 88–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 653–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1996). Adolescent social networks: school, demographic, and longitudinal considerations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(2), 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Epstein, J. L. (1983). Examining theories of adolescent friendships. In JoyceLevy Epstein & Nancy Karweit eds, Friends in school: patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools1 (pp. 39–61). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2012). Social network influences on adolescent substance use: disentangling structural equivalence from cohesion. Social Science and Medicine, 74(12), 1952–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall-Lande, J., Eisenberg, M., Christenson, S. L., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42(166), 265–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall, J. A., & Valente, T. W. (2007). Adolescent smoking networks: the effects of influence and selection on future smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 3054–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: how do peers matter? Social Forces, 84(2), 1109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Henry, D. B., & Kobus, K. (2007). Early adolescent social networks and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(3), 346–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffman, B. R., Sussman, S., Unger, J. B., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: a theoretical review of the literature. Substance Use & Misuse, 41(1), 103–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khantzian, E. J. (2003). Understanding addictive vulnerability: an evolving psychodynamic perspective. Neuropsychoanalysis, 5, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kobus, K., & Henry, D. B. (2010). Interplay of network position and peer substance use in early adolescent cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kreager, D. A. (2004). Strangers in the halls: isolation and delinquency in school networks. Social Forces, 83(1), 351–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lakon, C. M., Wang, C., Butts, C. T., Jose, R., Timberlake, D. S., & Hipp, J. R. (2015). A dynamic model of adolescent friendship networks, parental influences, and smoking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(9), 1767–1786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press. Third.Google Scholar
  36. McDonough, M. H., Paul, E. J., & Stuart, J. (2016). Bi-directional effects of peer relationships and adolescent substance use: a longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(8), 1652–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1088–1121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Meldrum, R. C., & Barnes, J. C. (2017). Unstructured socializing with peers and delinquent behavior: a genetically informed analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1968–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Moody, J., Wendy, D. B., Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M., & Gest., S. (2011). Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks, 33(2), 101–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Niño, M. D., Cai, T., & Ignatow, G. (2016). Social isolation, drunkenness, and cigarette use among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 94–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Oelsner, J., Melissa, A. L., & Greenberg, M. T. (2011). Factors influencing the development of school bonding among middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(3), 463–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Osgood, D. W., et al. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 500–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Wallace, L. N., & Moody, J. (2014). Friendship group position and substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 39(5), 923–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Paik, A., & Sanchagrin, K. (2013). Social isolation in America: an artifact. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pettigrew, J., Miller-Day, M., Krieger, J., & Hecht., M. L. (2012). The rural context of illicit substance offers: a study of Appalachian rural adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(4), 523–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. R Core Team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing.Google Scholar
  47. Ragan, D. T., Osgood, D. W., & Feinberg, MarkE. (2014). Friends as a bridge to parental influence: implications for adolescent alcohol use. Social Forces, 92(3), 1061–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simons-Morton, B., & Farhat, T. (2010). Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent substance use. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 31(4), 191–208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Simons, R. L., Les, B. W., Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (1991). Parenting factors, social skills, and value commitments as precursors to school failure, involvement with deviant peers, and delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20(6), 645–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, J. A., & Moody, J. (2013). Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: nodes missing at random. Social Networks, 35(4), 652–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, J. A., Moody, J., & Morgan, J. H. (2017). Network sampling coverage II: the effect of non-random missing data on network measurement. Social Networks, 48, 78–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Clair, S., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Preventing substance misuse through community-university partnerships: randomized controlled trial outcomes 4 1/2 years past caseline. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 440–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5(1), 31–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2002). Project family prevention trials based in community-university partnerships: toward scaled-up preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 3(3), 203–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tani, C. R., Ernest, L. C., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (2001). Peer isolation and drug use among white non-hispanic and mexican american adolescents. Adolescence, 36(141), 127–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tomlinson, K. L., & Brown, S. A. (2012). Self-medication or social learning? a comparison of models to predict early adolescent drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 37(2), 179–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tucker, J. S., Michael, S. P., de la Haye, K., Kennedy, D. P., & Green, H. D. (2013). Neighborhood characteristics and the initiation of marijuana use and binge drinking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 128(1–2), 83–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Umberson, D., Crosnoe, R., & Reczek, C. (2010). Social relationships and health behavior across life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 139–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Vogel, M., Chris, E. R., McCuddy, T., & Carson, D. C. (2015). The highs that bind: school context, social status and marijuana use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1153–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wentzel, K. R., & Asher., S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell., K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zweig, J. M., Lindberg, L. D., & McGinley., K. A. (2001). Adolescent health risk profiles: the co-occurrence of health risks among females and males. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(6), 707–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations