Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 1113–1127 | Cite as

Disentangling the Relations between Social Identity and Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Competitive Youth Sport

  • Mark W. Bruner
  • Ian D. Boardley
  • Alex J. Benson
  • Kathleen S. Wilson
  • Zachary Root
  • Jennifer Turnnidge
  • Jordan Sutcliffe
  • Jean Côté
Empirical Research

Abstract

The social identities formed through membership on extracurricular activity groups may contribute to the frequency with which youth engage in prosocial and antisocial behavior. However, researchers have yet to disentangle the individual- and group-level processes social identification effects operate through; sex and perceived norms may also moderate such effects. Thus, we investigated the hierarchical and conditional relations between three dimensions of social identity (i.e., ingroup ties, cognitive centrality, ingroup affect) and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth ice hockey players (N = 376; 33% female). Multilevel analyses demonstrated antisocial teammate and opponent behavior were predicted by cognitive centrality at the team level. Further, prosocial teammate behavior was predicted by cognitive centrality and ingroup ties at the individual-level. Also, perceived norms for prosocial teammate behavior moderated the relations between ingroup ties, cognitive centrality, and ingroup affect and prosocial teammate behaviour. Finally, sex moderated the relations between cognitive centrality/ingroup affect and antisocial opponent behavior. This work demonstrates the multilevel and conditional nature of how social identity dimensions relate to youth prosocial and antisocial behavior.

Keywords

Group dynamics Team identification Personal development Physical activity 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#435-2016-0591, #43502014-0038). The authors wish to thank all the participating hockey associations, coaches, teams, and young athletes that participated in the study.

Authors’ Contributions

M.W.B. conceptualized and designed the study, supervised overall data acquisition, conducted the analysis, provided interpretation of findings, and led the writing of the manuscript; I.D.B. conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the data analysis, provided interpretation of the findings, and critically revised the manuscript; A.J.B. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, conducted the data analysis, provided interpretation of the findings, and drafted and critically revised parts of the manuscript; K.S.W. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, conducted the data analysis, provided interpretation of the findings, and critically revised the manuscript; Z.R. supervised data acquisition, participated in drafting and revising parts of the manuscript; J.T. contributed to the conceptualization and design, supervised data acquisition, and critically revised the manuscript; J.S. contributed to the data collection, participated in drafting and revising parts of the manuscript; J.C. conceptualized and designed the study, contributed to data analysis and interpretation of findings, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

The institutional review board at Nipissing University has approved this study.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the youth athlete participants. All youth athletes gave active assent prior to administration of the survey.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. B. (2003). Social motivation in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(4), 551–567.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.4.551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359–373.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.
  4. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-59778(91)90022-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and social psychology review, 3(3), 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.
  6. Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect: its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412438352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson, A., Bruner, M. W., & Eys, M. (2017). A social identity approach to understanding the conditions associated with antisocial behaviours among teammates in female teams. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 6(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1037.spy0000090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2009). The influence of social variables and moral disengagement on prosocial and antisocial behaviours in field hockey and netball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(8), 843–854.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410902887283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of goal orientation and perceived value of toughness on antisocial behavior in soccer: the mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(2), 176–192.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.2.176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boman, IV, J. H., Young, J. T., Baldwin, J. M., & Meldrum, R. C. (2014). Specifying the sources of misperceptions of peer deviance: A tale of two levels. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(1), 91–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813496998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166–179.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 47  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruner, M. W., Balish, S. M., Forrest, C., Brown, S., Webber, K., Gray, E., McGuckin, M., Keats, M. R., Rehman, L. & Shields, C. A. (2017). Ties that bond: youth sport as a vehicle for social identity and positive youth development. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(2), 209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1296100.
  15. Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I., Allen, V., Forrest, C., Root, Z., & Côté, J. (2017). Understanding social identity and intrateam moral behavior in competitive youth ice hockey: a Narrative Perspective. The Sport Psychologist, 31, 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2015-0117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I., & Côté, J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I., Forrest, C., Buckham, S., Root, Z., Allen, V., & Côté, J. (2017). Examining social identity and intrateam moral behaviours in competitive youth ice hockey using stimulated recall. Journal of Sport Sciences., 35(20), 1963–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1243797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruner, M. W., Dunlop, W., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2014). A social identity perspective on group processes in sport and exercise. In M. R. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Ed.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 38–52). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Bruner, M. W., Eys, M. A., Wilson, K., & Côté, J. (2014). Group cohesion and positive youth development in team sport athletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 219–227.  https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruner, M. W., Eys, M. A., Evans, M. B., & Wilson, K. (2015). Interdependence and social identity in youth sport teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27(3), 351–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2015.1010661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3(3), 239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta‐analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child development, 79(5), 1185–1229.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlo, G., McGinley, M., Hayes, R., Batenhorst, C., & Wilkinson, J. (2007). Parenting styles or practices? Parenting, sympathy, and prosocial behaviors among adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 147–176.  https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.168.2.147-176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., McGinley, M. M., Tur-Porcar, A., Samper, P., & Opal, D. (2014). The protective role of prosocial behaviors on antisocial behaviors: The mediating effects of deviant peer affiliation. Journal of Adolescence, 37(4), 359–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 779–862). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644.
  28. Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 865–889.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-4537.3003.00095.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional and personality development. 5th edn. (pp. 701–778). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional and personality development (pp. 646–718). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Eisenberg, M. E., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Perry, C. (2005). The role of social norms and friends’ influences on unhealthy weight-control behaviors among adolescent girls. Social Science & Medicine, 60(6), 1165–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ellis, W., Zarbatany, L., Chen, X., Kinal, M., & Boyko, L. (2017). Peer groups as a context for school misconduct: The moderating role of group interactional style. Child Development.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. 2d edn., rev. and enl.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, M. B., Adler, A., MacDonald, D. J., & Côté, J. (2016). Bullying victimization and perpetration in adolescent sport teams. Pediatric Exercise Science, 28(2), 296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2015-0088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Developmental benefits of extracurricular involvement: Do peer characteristics mediate the link between activities and youth outcomes? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 507–520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8933-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 309–328.  https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2012). The impact of social ties on group interactions: evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(1), 101–115.Google Scholar
  42. Goldman, L., Giles, H., & Hogg, M. A. (2014). Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(6), 813–832.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214524289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hogg, M. A. (2006). Self-conceptual uncertainty and the lure of belonging. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional, and cultural influences (pp. 33–49). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: a historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2007.00066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Houge Mackenzie, S., & Kerr, J. H. (2012). Head-mounted cameras and stimulated recall in qualitative sport research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise, and Health, 4(1), 51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2011.653495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. International Ice Hockey Federation. (2016). 2016 Annual Report of the International Ice Hockey Federation. http://www.iihf.com/fileadmin/user_upload/BigFiles/AnnualReport/2016AnnualReport.pdf.
  48. Kavussanu, M., & Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(1), 97–117.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.1.97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kavussanu, M., Seal, A. R., & Phillips, D. R. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18(4), 326–344.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200600944108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kavussanu, M., Stamp, R., Slade, G., & Ring, C. (2009). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male and female soccer players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, S62–S76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200802624292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., & McGue, M. (2001). Altruism and antisocial behavior: Independent tendencies, unique personality correlates, distinct etiologies. Psychological Science, 12(5), 397–402.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relation of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta‐analysis. Child development, 84(2), 397–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01851.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin, L. J., Balderson, D., Hawkins, M., Wilson, K., & Bruner, M. W. (2017). The influence of social identity on self-worth, commitment, and effort in school-based youth sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1306091.Google Scholar
  55. Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Merrilees, C. E., Cairns, E., Taylor, L. K., Goeke‐Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2013). Social identity and youth aggressive and delinquent behaviors in a context of political violence. Political Psychology, 34(5), 695–711.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12030.Google Scholar
  58. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  59. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2001). Group identity and alienation: Giving the we its due. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(5), 515–538.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010480003929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nezlek, J. B., & Smith, C. V. (2005). Social identity in daily social interaction. Self and Identity, 4(3), 243–261.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ostrov, J. M., Murray-Close, D., Godleski, S. A., & Hart, E. J. (2013). Prospective associations between forms and functions of aggression and social and affective processes during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 19–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Pfeifer, J. H., & Peake, S. J. (2012). Self-development: Integrating cognitive, socioemotional, and neuroimaging perspectives. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 55–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rees, T., Haslam, S. A., Coffee, P., & Lavallee, D. (2015). A social identity approach to sport psychology: Principles, practice, and prospects. Sports Medicine, 45(8), 1083–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0345-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Rideout, V. (2012). Social media social life: How teens view their digital lives. Common Sense Media. http://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/social-media-social-life. Accessed 1 August 2017
  66. Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2015). A re‐explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory, 25(4), 393–409.  https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robinson, S. L., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256963.
  68. Sage, L., & Kavussanu, M. (2007). The effects of goal involvement on moral behavior in an experimentally manipulated competitive setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(2), 190–207.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.2.190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Sage, L., Kavussanu, M., & Duda, J. (2006). Goal orientations and moral identity as predictors of prosocial and antisocial functioning in male association football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(5), 455–466.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500244531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Shapcott, K. M., Bloom, G. A., & Loughead, T. M. (2007). An initial exploration of the factors influencing aggressive and assertive intentions of women ice hockey players. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(2), 145–162.Google Scholar
  71. Sherif, O. J., Harvey, B., White, J. B., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, Okla: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
  72. Shields, D. L., Bredemeier, B. L., LaVoi, N. M., & Power, C. F. (2005). The behavior of youth, parents, and coaches: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Research in Character Education, 3(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  73. Shields, D. L., LaVoi, N. M., Bredemeier, B. L., & Power, F. C. (2007). Predictors of poor sportspersonship in youth sports: Personal attitudes and social influences. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(6), 747–762.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.6.747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, M. D. (1979). Hockey violence: A test of the violent subculture hypothesis. Social Problems, 27(2), 235–247.  https://doi.org/10.2307/800371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith, K. C., Ulch, S. E., Cameron, J. E., Cumberland, J. A., Musgrave, M. A., & Tremblay, N. (1989). Gender-related effects in the perception of anger expression. Sex Roles, 20(9), 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sussman, S., Pokhrel, P., Ashmore, R. D., & Brown, B. B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive behaviors, 32(8), 1602–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. 5th edn. Boston, MA: Alyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  78. Tanti, C., Stukas, A. A., Halloran, M. J., & Foddy, M. (2011). Social identity change: Shifts in social identity during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 555–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  83. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self‐identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Tidwell, M. V. (2005). A social identity model of prosocial behaviors within non-profit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(4), 449–467.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN) 1542-7854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207–226.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430201004003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tucker, L. W., & Parks, J. B. (2001). Effects of gender and sport type on intercollegiate athletes’ perceptions of the legitimacy of aggressive behaviors in sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18(4), 403–413.  https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.18.4.403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Hoorn, J., Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A. (2016). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1), 90–100.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vanier, J. L., Bloom, G. A., & Loughead, T. M. (2005). Personal experience, rules, procedures, and aspects of aggression in competitive woman’s ice hockey. Avante, 11, 66–82.Google Scholar
  90. van Kleef, G. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2016). Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1081349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Van Zalk, M. H. (2013). Network–behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 399–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora/12070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wagner, W. G. (1996). Facilitating optimal development in adolescence: Introductory remarks. Counseling Psychologist, 24(3), 357–359.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000096243001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-Expanded form. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  95. Young, J. T., Barnes, J. C., Meldrum, R. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2011). Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology, 49(2), 599–630.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00232.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Young, J. T., & Weerman, F. M. (2013). Delinquency as a consequence of misperception: Overestimation of friends’ delinquent behavior and mechanisms of social influence. Social Problems, 60(3), 334–356.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.3.334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark W. Bruner
    • 1
  • Ian D. Boardley
    • 2
  • Alex J. Benson
    • 3
  • Kathleen S. Wilson
    • 4
  • Zachary Root
    • 5
  • Jennifer Turnnidge
    • 6
  • Jordan Sutcliffe
    • 1
  • Jean Côté
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Physical and Health EducationNipissing UniversityNorth BayCanada
  2. 2.School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  4. 4.Department of KinesiologyCalifornia State UniversityFullertonUSA
  5. 5.Faculty of Applied SciencesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  6. 6.School of Kinesiology and Health StudiesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations