Parental Knowledge of Adolescents’ Online Content and Contact Risks
Parental knowledge about adolescents’ activities is an identified protective factor in terms of adolescent adjustment. While research on parental knowledge has focused on adolescents’ offline behavior, there is little empirical understanding of parental knowledge about adolescents’ online behavior. This study investigates parental knowledge about adolescents’ online activities and experiences with online risks, as well as the correlates of such knowledge. Building on former research, open communication and knowledge-generating monitoring practices are investigated as potential correlates of parental knowledge. Use is made of triadic data, relying on reports from children aged 13 to 18, mothers and fathers within the same family (N = 357 families; 54.9 % female adolescents). The results showed that parents have little knowledge about the occurrence of online risks and their children’s online activities. While mothers did not have more accurate knowledge compared to fathers, they did perceive themselves to be more knowledgeable than fathers. Associations between parental knowledge and hypothesized correlates were tested by means of one-way ANOVA tests and stepwise logistic regression models. Limited evidence was found for associations with parents’ accurate knowledge about the occurrence of online risks. Engagement in knowledge-generating monitoring practices was linked to mothers and fathers’ self-perceived knowledge about their children’s online activities. For mothers, open communication with the child was linked to self-perceived knowledge. The findings suggest that parents need to be more aware of the possibility that online risks might occur and that more research needs to be done in order to understand what parents can do to improve their accurate knowledge.
KeywordsParental knowledge Online risk behavior Parental monitoring Parental mediation Parental communication Triadic study
KS conceived of the study, participated in its design, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; KP, MW and WH participated in the design and coordination of the study and helped to draft the manuscript; KP was responsible for the data collection; KE participated in the coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The study was funded by the Research Fund of Odisee.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The study, including the data collection and handling of the data, obtained ethics approval by the ethical research committee of Antwerp University.
Following ethical guidelines, informed consent was obtained from all adult individual participants to the study.
- Ang, R. (2015). Adolescent cyberbullying: A review of characteristics, prevention and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, [published online]. Google Scholar
- Cottrell, L., Rishel, C., Lilly, C., Cottrell, S., Metzger, A., Ahmadi, H., Wang, B., Li, X., & Stanton, B. (2015). Do parents meet adolescents’ monitoring standards? Examination of the impact on teen risk disclosure and behaviors if they don’t. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0125750.Google Scholar
- Cross, C. P., Cyrenne, D. L. M., & Brown, G. R. (2013). Sex differences in sensation-seeking: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 3, doi: 10.1038/srep02486.
- Fridh, M., Lindström, M., & Rosvall, M. (2015). Subjective health complaints of adolescent victims of cyber harassment: moderation through support from parents/friends—A Swedish population-based study. BMC Public Health, 15, 949. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2239-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hamm, M. P., Newton, A. S., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Sundar, P., Ennis, H., Scott, S. D., & Hartling, L. (2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people. A scoping review of social media studies. Clinical Review and Education, 169(8), 770–777.Google Scholar
- Khurana, A., Bleakley, A., Jordan, A.B., & Romer, D. (2015). The protective effects of parental monitoring and internet restriction on adolescents' risk of online harassment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 1039–1047.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology. Overview 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/.
- Livingstone, S. (2010). From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. In E. Devereux (Ed.). Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 302–321). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online: surveying the experiences of young people and their parents. London: LSE Research Online. [online].Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Technical report and user guide: The 2010 EU kids online survey. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harm experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 635–654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2013). Net children go mobile: Risks and opportunities. Milano: Educatt.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus User's Guide. Seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Sabina, C., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2008). The nature and dynamics of internet pornography exposure for youth. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 691–693.Google Scholar