A Social Domain Approach to Informant Discrepancies in Parental Solicitation and Family Rules
- 320 Downloads
An extensive body of research has explored the effects of parental monitoring on adolescent outcomes, but studies consistently find substantial discrepancies between parent and adolescent reports of different monitoring behaviors. Little research has examined whether parents and adolescents are more or less discrepant when reporting on parents’ rules or solicitation for different adolescent problem and health risk behaviors and few studies have explored potential explanatory variables to explicate individual variability in parent-adolescent discrepant reporting. To address this gap in the literature, the current study examined discrepancies in mother-adolescent reports of family rules and solicitation across five distinct adolescent behaviors: personal behaviors and four different risk behaviors (alcohol-related, cyber, over- and under-eating). Participants were 143 mother-adolescent dyads (Adolescent M age = 14.42, SD = 1.73, range = 12–18, 81 % white, 60 % female). Mean-level discrepancies between maternal and adolescent reports significantly differed by category of adolescent behavior and also varied as a function of reported parental monitoring behavior (rules vs. solicitation). Discrepancies in mother-adolescent reports of behavior-specific rules and solicitation were positively associated with discrepancies in mother and adolescent judgments of the harmfulness of the activities. The results demonstrate that discrepancies in mother-adolescent reports of family process differ by category of adolescent behavior and may be undergirded by differences in mother and adolescent informational assumptions about the potential harm involved with different activities.
KeywordsAdolescents Social domain Family process Monitoring Discrepancies Adolescent risk behaviors Alcohol behaviors Cyber behaviors Eating behaviors
We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Benjamin Oosterhoff and Kaitlyn Ferris, who contributed to the design and data collection for this project.
This research was supported via internal funding through West Virginia University.
AM conceived of the study, oversaw the majority of the writing including introduction and discussion, coordinated the drafting of the manuscript, and wrote the majority of the introduction and discussion. EB made substantial intellectual and conceptual contributions to the design of the project, participated in the design of the study, aided in the interpretation of data and statistical analysis, and wrote multiple sections of the introduction and discussion. RO contributed to statistical analysis and interpretation and wrote the results section. KR aided RO in statistical analysis, wrote the methods section, and also helped author the results section and contributed to interpretation of data analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The current study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for West Virginia University.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All participating youth and parents gave informed consent prior to their participation. In addition, parental permission and consent was obtained from the parents of all youth under 18 years of age.
- Babskie, E., & Metzger, A. Associations among adolescents’ cyber-specific beliefs and information management strategies. Journal of Family Issues. (in press).Google Scholar
- Clark, D. B., Lynch, K. G., Donovan, J. E., & Block, G. D. (2001). Health problems in adolescents with alcohol use disorders: Self-report, liver injury, and physical examination findings and correlates. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 1350–1359. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02358.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quiñones, K. R. (2008). Whose depression relates to discrepancies? Testing relations between informant characteristics and informant discrepancies from both informants’ perspectives. Psychological Assessment, 20, 139–149. doi: 10.1037/1040-35188.8.131.52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Los Reyes, A., Goodman, K. L., Kliewer, W., & Reid-Quiñones, K. (2010). The longitudinal consistency of mother–child reporting discrepancies of parental monitoring and their ability to predict child delinquent behaviors two years later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1417–1430. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9496-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Los Reyes, A., Lerner, M. D., Thomas, S. A., Daruwala, S. E., & Goepel, K. A. (2013). Discrepancies between parent and adolescent beliefs about daily life topics and performance on an emotion recognition task. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 971–982. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9733-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- De Los Reyes, A., Thomas, S. A., Swan, A. J., Ehrlich, K. B., Reynolds, E. K., Suarez, L., & Pabón, S. C. (2012). ‘‘It depends on what you mean by ‘disagree’’’: Differences between parent and child perceptions of parent–child conflict. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34, 293–307. doi: 10.1007/s10862-012-9288-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- de Sausmarez, E., & Dunsmuir, S. (2011). Factors associated with overweight and obese children’s weight-related behaviours and cognitions: Assessment and intervention. Educational and Child Psychology, 28, 14–22.Google Scholar
- Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 807–823. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-92214-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laird, R. D., & De Los Reyes, A. (2013). Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of adolescent psychopathology: Why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9659-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents’ monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74, 752–768. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Metzger, A., Wakschlag, L. S., Anderson, R., Darfler, A., Price, J., Flores, Z., & Mermelstein, R. (2013). Information management strategies within conversations about cigarette smoking: Parenting correlates and longitudinal associations with teen smoking. Developmental Psychology, 23, 364–374. doi: 10.1037/a0030720.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G. (1995). Context, conflict, and constraint in parent-adolescent authority relationships. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives (pp. 225–255). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescent, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 42, 305–318. doi: 10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: What changes, and why? In R. E. Dahl, L. P. Spear, R. E. Dahl, & L. P. Spear (Eds.), Adolescent brain development: Vulnerabilities and opportunities (pp. 51–58). New York, NY, US: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar