Youth–Adult Partnerships and Youth Identity Style
- 604 Downloads
Youth–adult partnerships (e.g., youth leading programs, participating as members of advisory boards) are a common and widely recommended practice in youth work and youth-serving program settings. Although researchers have suggested that these opportunities contribute to youth’s identity development, empirical evidence is lacking. In the current study, we tested associations between identity style and degree of youth voice, collaborative youth–adult relationships, and youth’s program engagement in 194 youth participating in youth–adult partnerships (M age = 17.6, 62 % female). We found that these characteristics of youth–adult partnerships predicted higher informational identity style, although only program engagement emerged as a unique predictor. Furthermore, exploratory analysis indicated that these associations were moderated by the type of organization. The findings suggest the need for more research on the multiple dimensions of youth–adult partnerships and their association with youth functioning, as well as pointing to the importance of the broader organizational context of youth–adult partnerships.
KeywordsYouth–adult partnerships Identity Youth voice Engagement Organizational context
This research was supported in part by a scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the first author and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to the first and third authors.
This study was funded by a scholarship to H R from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (award number 752-2009-1597), and a grant from Humber’s Staff Initiated Research Fund to H R and H L (award number 2013‐011).
H R conceived of the study, conducted data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. L R K conceived of the study, participated in the plan and interpretation of the analysis, and participated in drafting the manuscript. H L participated in the design and interpretation of the analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors participated in the design and coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
All authors, declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained through Brock University and Humber’s Research Ethics Boards. All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All authors, H R , L R K , and H L , affirm that the manuscript is in compliance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement guidelines for ethical conduct of research involving human participants.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Blanchet-Cohen, N. Linds, W., Mann-Feder, V., & Yuen, F. (Eds.) (2013). Transforming practices: Emancipatory approaches to youth engagement. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 3, 320–327.Google Scholar
- Cater, M. D. W. (2006). How voice affects perceptions of relationship with adults, ownership, and engagement in youth (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College).Google Scholar
- Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. (2008). An examination of youth voice via quasi- experimental methodology. Journal of Youth Development, 3(2). Retrieved from http://data.memberclicks.com/site/nae4a/JYD_080302final.pdf.
- Cater, M., Machtmes, K., & Fox, J. E. (2013). A phenomenological examination of context on adolescent ownership and engagement rationale. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Chilenski, S. M., Olson, J. R., Schulte, J. A., Perkins, D. F., & Spoth, R. (2015). A multi-level examination of how the organizational context relates to readiness to implement prevention and evidence-based programming in community settings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 48, 63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.10.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Hardy, S. A., Pratt, M. W., Pancer, S. M., Olsen, J. A., & Lawford, H. L. (2011). Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 125–135. doi: 10.1177/0165025410375920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krauss, S. E., Collura, J., Zeldin, S., Ortega, A., Abdullah, H., & Sulaiman, A. H. (2014). Youth-adult partnership: Exploring contributions to empowerment, agency and community connections in Malaysian youth programs. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43, 1550–1562. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0027-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larson, R. W., Izenstark, D., Rodriguez G., & Cole Perry, S. (2015). The art of restraint: How experienced program leaders use their authority to support youth agency. Journal of Research on Adolescence. doi: 10.1111/jora.12234.
- Lulow, E., Harrington, K., Alexander, M., & Kendrick Burk, L. (2014). Becoming a youth-guided residential organization. In G. M. Blau, B. Cladwell, & R. E. Lieberman (Eds.), Residential interventions for children, adolescents, and families: A best practice guide (pp. 46–60). NY, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McIntosh, H., Metz, E., & Youniss, J. (2005). Community service and identity formation in adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development (pp. 331–351). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2013). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J. (2002, May). Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/corrtest/corrtest.htm.
- Saito, R. N., & Sullivan, T. K. (2011). The many faces, features and outcomes of youth engagement. Journal of Youth Development, 6, 109–125.Google Scholar
- Smits, I., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Kunnen, S., & Bosma, H. (2008). The Identity Style Inventory—4: Internal research report. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University Leuven.Google Scholar
- Waterman, A. S. (2011). Eudaimonic identity theory: Identity as self-discovery. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Lyuckx, V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 357–379). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_16.
- Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Zeldin, S., Gauley, J., Krauss, S. E., Kornbluh, M., & Collura, J. (2015a). Youth–adult partnership and youth civic development: Cross-national analyses for scholars and field professionals. Youth & Society. doi: 10.1177/0044118X15595153.
- Zeldin, S., Krauss, S. E., Kim, T., Collura, J., & Abdullah, H. (2015b). Pathways to youth empowerment and community connectedness: A study of youth-adult partnership in Malaysian after-school, co-curricular programs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0320-2.