Promoting Educational Resiliency in Youth with Incarcerated Parents: The Impact of Parental Incarceration, School Characteristics, and Connectedness on School Outcomes
- 3.5k Downloads
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, and as a result, one of the largest populations of incarcerated parents. Growing evidence suggests that the incarceration of a parent may be associated with a number of risk factors in adolescence, including school drop out. Taking a developmental ecological approach, this study used multilevel modeling to examine the association of parental incarceration on truancy, academic achievement, and lifetime educational attainment using the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health (48.3 % female; 46 % minority status). Individual characteristics, such as school and family connectedness, and school characteristics, such as school size and mental health services, were examined to determine whether they significantly reduced the risk associated with parental incarceration. Our results revealed small but significant risks associated with parental incarceration for all outcomes, above and beyond individual and school level characteristics. Family and school connectedness were identified as potential compensatory factors, regardless of parental incarceration history, for academic achievement and truancy. School connectedness did not reduce the risk associated with parental incarceration when examining highest level of education. This study describes the school related risks associated with parental incarceration, while revealing potential areas for school-based prevention and intervention for adolescents.
KeywordsChildren with incarcerated parents School outcomes Adolescence Drop out Resiliency Multilevel modeling School connectedness Family connectedness
This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). This research uses data from the AHAA study, which was funded by a Grant (R01 HD040428-02, Chandra Muller, PI) from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and a Grant (REC-0126167, Chandra Muller, PI, and Pedro Reyes, Co-PI) from the National Science Foundation. This research was also supported by Grant, 5 R24 HD042849, Population Research Center, awarded to the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Child Development. Opinions reflect those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the granting agencies. No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 or Grant R01 HD040428-02 for this analysis.
Emily B. Nichols conceived of the study, participated in its design, conducted statistical analysis and data interpretation, and drafted the manuscript; Ann B. Loper participated in the study design, interpretation of the data, and editing of the manuscript; J. Patrick Meyer participated in the design of the study, consulted on the statistical analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests.
- Chantala, K. (2006). Guidelines for analyzing add health data. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Eddy, J. M., & Reid, J. B. (2003). The adolescent chidlren of incarcerated parents: A developmental perspective. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on chidlren, families, and communities (pp. 233–258). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Hagan, J., & Foster, H. (2012). Intergenerational educational effects of mass imprisonment in America. Sociology of Education, 20(10), 1–28.Google Scholar
- Hairston, C. F. (2003). Prisoners and their families: Parenting issues during incarceration. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families and communities (pp. 259–285). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Harris, K. M., Halpern C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P. & Udry, J. R. (2009). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design [WWW document]. URL: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.
- Hawkins, J., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R., Hill, K., & Abbott, R. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood: Long term effects from the Seattle Social Development Project. Archives of Pediatric Adolescence Medicine, 159, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kierkus, C. A., & Baer, D. (2002). Social control explanation of the relationship between family structure and delinquent behaviour. A. Canadian J. Criminology, 44, 425.Google Scholar
- Maruschak, L. M., Glaze, L. E., & Mumula, C. J. (2010). Incarcerated Parents and their children: Findings from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. In J. Poehlmann & M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 33–55). Washington DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Muller, C., Pearson, J., Riegle-Crumb, C., Harris-Requejo, J., Frank, K., Schiller, K., et al. (2007). Wave III educational data: Design and implementation of the adolescent health and academic achievement study. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center.Google Scholar
- Radenbusch, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M. (2000). Protective factors, resiliency, and healthy youth development. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 11(1), 157–164.Google Scholar
- Shlafer, R. J., & Poehlmann, J. (2011). Adolescence in the context of parental incarceration: Family, school, and community factors. In J. Poehlmann & M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 13–32). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Stanton, A. (1980). When mothers go to jail. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Travis, J., & Waul, M. (2003). Prisoners once removed: The children and families of prisoners. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The children and families of prisoners (pp. 1–33). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Paris, France.Google Scholar