Delay Discounting Mediates Parent–Adolescent Relationship Quality and Risky Sexual Behavior for Low Self-Control Adolescents
- 768 Downloads
Parent–adolescent relationship quality and delay discounting may play important roles in adolescents’ sexual decision making processes, and levels of self-control during adolescence could act as a buffer within these factors. This longitudinal study included 219 adolescent (55 % male; mean age = 12.66 years at Wave 1; mean age = 15.10 years at Wave 2) and primary caregiver dyads. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to determine whether delay discounting mediated the association between parent–adolescent relationship quality and adolescents’ risky sexual behavior and how this mediated association may differ between those with high versus low self-control. The results revealed parent–adolescent relationship quality plays a role in the development of risky sexual behavior indirectly through levels of delay discounting, but only for adolescents with low self-control. These findings could inform sex education policies and health prevention programs that address adolescent risky sexual behavior.
KeywordsDelay discounting Parent–adolescent relationship quality Risky sexual behavior Adolescence Self-control
This work was supported by Grants awarded to Jungmeen Kim-Spoon from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD057386) and the National Institute of Drug Abuse (DA036017). We thank Laurel Marburg, Eirini Papafratzeskakou, Diana Riser, and Gregory Longo for their help with data collection. We are grateful to adolescents and parents who participated in our study.
R.E.K conceived of the study, participated in its design and interpretation of the data, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. C.H. participated in the design and interpretation of the data. J.P.F participated in the coordination of the study and performed measurements. J. K. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, supervised the statistical analysis, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beadnell, B., Morrison, D. M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E. A., Murowchick, E., Hoppe, M., & Nahom, D. (2005). Condom use, frequency of sex, and number of partners: Multidimensional characterization of adolescent sexual risk-taking. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 192–202. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bickel, W. K., Miller, M. L., Yi, R., Kowal, B. P., Lindquist, D. M., & Pitcock, J. A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, S85–S91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.016.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2010. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012a). Condoms and STDs: Fact sheet for public health personnel. Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012b).Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2012. MMWR 2012; 61 (No. 4).Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014).Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2013. MMWR 2014; 63 (No. 4).Google Scholar
- Crockett, L. J., & Crouter, A. C. (2014). Pathways through adolescence: An overview. In L. J. Crockett & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Pathways through adolescence: Individual development in relation to social contexts (pp. 1–12). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- de Ridder, D. T., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control a meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99. doi: 10.1177/1088868311418749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Euser, A. S., Evans, B. E., Greaves-Lord, K., Huizink, A. C., & Franken, I. H. (2013). Parental rearing behavior prospectively predicts adolescents’ risky decision-making and feedback-related electrical brain activity. Developmental Science, 16, 409–427. doi: 10.1111/desc.12026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farley, J. P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2015). Parenting and adolescent self-regulation mediate between family socioeconomic status and adolescent adjustment. Manuscript accepted for publication.Google Scholar
- Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Self-regulation and sexual restraint: Dispositionally and temporarily poor self-regulatory abilities contribute to failures at restraining sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 173–186. doi: 10.1177/0146167206293472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kahn, R. E., King-Casas, B., Deater-Deckard, K., Chiu, P., & Kim-Spoon, J. (2015). Adolescent executive functioning as neurobehavioral determinants of health risk behaviors. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Kim-Spoon, J., McCullough, M. E., Bickel, W. K., Farley, J. P., & Longo, G. S. (2015a). Longitudinal associations among religiousness, delay discounting, and substance use initiation in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 36–43. doi: 10.1111/jora.12104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim-Spoon, J., Chiu, P. H., Deater-Deckard, K., Farley, J. P., Lauharatanahirun, N, Bickel, W. K., & King-Casas, B. A. (2015b). Neurobehavioral Study of the Interaction between Risk Sensitivity and Cognitive Control Related to Adolescent Health Risk Behaviors. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Liu, G., Hariri, S., Bradley, H., Gottlieb, S. L., Leichliter, J. S., & Markowitz, L. E. (2015). Trends and patterns of sexual behaviors among adolescents and adults aged 14 to 59 years, United States. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 42, 20–26. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahalik, J. R., Levine Coley, R., McPherran Lombardi, C., Doyle Lynch, A., Markowitz, A. J., & Jaffee, S. R. (2013). Changes in health risk behaviors for males and females from early adolescence through early adulthood. Health Psychology, 32, 685–694. doi: 10.1037/a0031658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Markham, C. M., Tortolero, S. R., Escobar-Chaves, S. L., Parcel, G. S., Harrist, R., & Addy, R. C. (2003). Family connectedness and sexual risk-taking among urban youth attending alternative high schools. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 174–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-2393.2003.tb00255.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
- Pingel, E. S., Bauermeister, J. A., Elkington, K. S., Fergus, S., Caldwell, C. H., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2012). Condom use trajectories in adolescence and the transition to adulthood: The role of mother and father support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 350–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00775.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/.
- Reynolds, B., & Schiffbauer, R. (2005). Delay of gratification and delay discounting: A unifying feedback model of delay-related impulsive behavior. The Psychological Record, 55, 439–460.Google Scholar
- Sethi, A., Mischel, W., Aber, J. L., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (2000). The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: Predicting preschoolers’ delay of gratification from mother–toddler interactions. Developmental Psychology, 36, 767–777. doi: 10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shorey, R. C., Fite, P. J., Choi, H., Cohen, J. R., Stuart, G. L., & Temple, J. R. (2015). Dating violence and substance use as longitudinal predictors of adolescents’ risky sexual behavior. Prevention Science. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0556-9.
- Simpson, A. R. (2001). Raising Teens: A synthesis of research and a foundation for action. Boston: Center for Health Communication, Harvard School of Public Health.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau. (2007). American community survey. Retrieved September 8, from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
- United States Census Bureau. (2011). American community survey. Retrieved November 10, from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_11_1YR_DP05&prodType=table.
- Wills, T. A., Ainette, M. G., Stoolmiller, M., Gibbons, F. X., & Shinar, O. (2008). Good self-control as a buffering agent for adolescent substance use: An investigation in early adolescence with time-varying covariates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 459–471. doi: 10.1037/a0012965.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on US adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28, 153–224. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar