Mexican–American Adolescents’ Gender Role Attitude Development: The Role of Adolescents’ Gender and Nativity and Parents’ Gender Role Attitudes
Gender development has long term implications for education and career endeavors and family formation behaviors, but we know very little about the role of sociocultural factors in developmental and individual differences. In this study, we investigated one domain of gender development, gender role attitudes, in Mexican–American adolescents (N = 246; 51 % female), using four phases of longitudinal data across 8 years. Data were collected when adolescents averaged 12.51 years (SD = 0.58), 14.64 years (SD = 0.59), 17.72 years (SD = 0.57), and 19.60 years of age (SD = 0.66). Mothers’ and fathers’ gender role attitudes also were assessed in Phases 1, 3, and 4. Findings revealed that gender attitude development varied as a function of the interaction between adolescents’ nativity and gender. Among Mexico-born adolescents, females exhibited significant declines in traditional attitudes from early to late adolescence, but males’ attitudes were stable over time. U.S.-born females and males, in contrast, did not differ in their gender attitude trajectories. Examining the links between mothers’, fathers’, and adolescents’ gender role attitudes revealed within-person associations between mothers’ and adolescents’ gender role attitudes: on occasions when mothers reported more traditional attitudes relative to their own cross-time average, adolescents also reported more traditional attitudes than usual. In addition, fathers’ more traditional gender role attitudes were associated with daughters’, but not sons’, more traditional gender role attitudes at the between-person level. The discussion focuses on the interpretation of Mexican–American adolescents’ gender role attitude development from a cultural ecological perspective.
KeywordsAdolescence Gender role attitudes Mexican–American Mothers and fathers Longitudinal Sociocultural context
We are grateful to the families and youth who participated in this project, and to the following schools and districts who collaborated: Osborn, Mesa, and Gilbert school districts, Willis Junior High School, Supai and Ingleside Middle Schools, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Gregory, St. Francis Xavier, St. Mary-Basha, and St. John Bosco. We thank Ann Crouter, Mark Roosa, Nancy Gonzales, Roger Millsap, Jennifer Kennedy, Leticia Gelhard, Melissa Delgado, Emily Cansler, Shawna Thayer, Devon Hageman, Ji-Yeon Kim, Lilly Shanahan, Chun Bun Lam, Megan Baril, Anna Solmeyer, and Shawn Whiteman for their assistance in conducting this investigation. Funding was provided by NICHD grants R01HD39666 (Kimberly A. Updegraff, PI) and R01-HD32336 (Ann C. Crouter & Susan M. McHale, Co-PIs) and by the Cowden Fund to the T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics at ASU.
KU participated in the study’s conception, design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. SM participated in the study’s conception, design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. KZ performed the analyses, interpreted the data, and helped draft the manuscript. AU participated in the study’s conception, design and coordination, and provided feedback on the manuscript. LW participated in the study’s coordination, assisted with the analyses and interpretation of the data, and provided feedback on the manuscript. NP participated in the study’s coordination, helped with the interpretation of the data and provided feedback. SR participated in the study’s coordination, helped with the interpretation of data and provided feedback. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
- Baca Zinn, M., & Wells, B. (2000). Diversity within Latino families: New lessons for family social science. In D. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 252–273). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Crouter, A. C. (1983). The evolution of environment models in development research. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 358–414). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cabrera, N. J., & The SRCD Ethnic and Racial Issues Committee (2013). Positive development of minority children. Social Policy Report, 27, 1–30. Retrieved January 8, 2014 from http://www.srcd.org/sites/default/files/documents/washington/spr_272_final.pdf.
- Cauce, A. M., & Domenech-Rodríguez, M. (2002). Latino families: Myths and realities. In J. M. Contreras, K. A. Kerns, & A. M. Neal-Barnett (Eds.), Latino children and families in the United States (pp. 5–25). Westport, CT: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Fuligni, A. J. (2001). A comparative longitudinal approach to acculturation among children from immigrant families. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 566–578.Google Scholar
- Galambos, N. L., Berenbaum. S. A., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Gender development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 305–357). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001011.
- Gonzales, N. A., Fabrett, F., & Knight, G. P. (2009). Acculturation, enculturation, and the psychosocial adaptation of Latino youth. In F. A. Villarruel, G. Carlo, J. M. Grau, M. Azmitia, N. J. Cabrera, & T. J. Chahin (Eds.), Handbook of U.S. Latino Psychology: Developmental and community-based perspectives (pp. 115–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Grotevant, H. D. (1998). Adolescent development in family contexts. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Social, emotional, and personality development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, L. & Templin, J. (2011, October). Systematically varying effects in multilevel models: Permissible or Problematic? Paper session presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
- Mischel, W. (1966). A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 57–81). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Percentage of persons age 25 and over with high school completion or higher and a bachelor’s or higher degree, by race/ethnicity and state: 2008–2010. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_015.asp. Accessed 18 Dec 2013.
- Parke, R. D., & Buriel, R. (2006). Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 429–504). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Umaña-Taylor, A. J., & Updegraff, K. A. (2012). Latino families in the United States. In G. W. Peterson & K. R. Bush (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and family (3rd ed., pp. 723–747). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., Whiteman, S. D., Thayer, S. M., & Delgado, M. Y. (2005). Adolescents’ sibling relationships in Mexican American families: Exploring the role of familism. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 512–522. doi: 10.1037/0893-3126.96.36.1992.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Updegraff, K. A., & Umaña-Taylor, A. (2010). Structure and process in Mexican-origin families and their implications for youth development. In N. Lansdale, S. M. McHale, & A. Booth (Eds.), Growing up Hispanic: Health and development of children of immigrants (pp. 97–144). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Hispanic Heritage Month 2013. U.S. Census Bureau News. Retrieved March 26 2014 from www.census.gov/.../releases/pdf/cb13ff-19_hispanicheritage.pdf.
- Census Bureau, U. S. (2000). Projections of the total resident population by 5-year age groups, race, and Hispanic origin with special age categories: Middle series, 2001–2005. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division.Google Scholar
- U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (August 2012). Labor Force Characteristics by Race and Ethnicity, 2011. Retrieved January 8 2014 from www.bls.gov/cps/cpsrace2011.pdf.