Processes Linking Parents’ and Adolescents’ Religiousness and Adolescent Substance Use: Monitoring and Self-Control
- 800 Downloads
Empirical evidence suggests that religiousness is related negatively to adolescent substance use; yet, we know little about how such protective effects might occur. The current study examined whether parents’ and adolescents’ religiousness are associated positively with parental, religious, and self-monitoring, which in turn are related to higher self-control, thereby related to lower adolescent substance use. Participants were 220 adolescents (45 % female) who were interviewed at ages 10–16 and again 2.4 years later. Structural equation modeling analyses suggested that higher adolescents’ religiousness at Time 1 was related to lower substance use at Time 2 indirectly through religious monitoring, self-monitoring, and self-control. Higher parents’ religiousness at Time 1 was associated with higher parental monitoring at Time 2, which in turn was related to lower adolescent substance use at Time 2 directly and indirectly through higher adolescent self-control. The results illustrate that adolescents with high awareness of being monitored by God are likely to show high self-control abilities and, consequently, low substance use. The findings further suggest that adolescents’ religiousness as well as their religious environments (e.g., familial context) can facilitate desirable developmental outcomes.
KeywordsReligiousness Monitoring Self-control Adolescent substance use
This work was supported by Grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD057386) and the John Templeton Foundation. We thank Laurel Marburg, Eirini Papafratzeskakou, and Diana Riser for their help with data collection. We are grateful to adolescents and parents who participated in our study.
JKS conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed statistical analyses and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript; JPF participated in data collection and statistical analyses, and helped to draft the manuscript; CH participated in statistical analyses and helped to draft the manuscript; GSL participated in data collection and helped to draft the manuscript; MEM conceived the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
- Bowers, E. P., Gestsdottir, S., Geldhof, G. J., Nikitin, J., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Developmental trajectories of intentional self-regulation in adolescence: The role of parenting and implications for positive and problematic outcomes among diverse youth. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 1193–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carter, E. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2010). Waiting, tolerating, and cooperating. Did religion evolve to prop up human’s self-control abilities? In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: research, theories, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 422–437). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2012. MMWR 2012, 61(4), 1–24.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys. The tailed design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, E. M., & Clingempeel, W. G. (1999). Adolescent sibling in stepfamilies: Family functioning and adolescent adjustment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64(4 Serial No. 259), 26–49.Google Scholar
- Kim-Spoon, J., Longo, G., & McCullough, M. E. (2012). Parent–adolescent relationship quality as a moderator for the influences of parents’ religiousness on adolescents’ religiousness and adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1576–1587. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9796-1.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim-Spoon, J., McCullough, M. E., Bickel, W. K., Farley, J. P., & Longo, G. S. (2013). Longitudinal associations among adolescent religiousness, delay discounting, and substance use (submitted).Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Levesque, R. J. R. (2002). Not faith alone: Religion, law, and adolescence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Brown, J. M. (1991). Self-regulation as a conceptual basis for the prevention of addictive behaviours. In H. Heather, W. R. Miller, & J. Greeley (Eds.), Self-control and the addictive behaviours (pp. 3–79). Sydney: Maxwell Macmillan.Google Scholar
- McCullough, M. E., & Carter, E. C. (2011). Religion and self-regulation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (computer software and manual) (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Sayette, M. A. (2004). Self-regulatory failure and addiction. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 1–12). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau. (2012). American community survey. Retrieved April 3, 2013, from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
- Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 1–12). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Wills, T. A., Ainette, M. G., Stoolmiller, M., Gibbons, F. X., & Shinar, O. (2008). Good self-control as a buffering agent for adolescent substance use: An investigation in early adolescence with time-varying covariates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 459–471. doi: 10.1037/a0012965.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar