Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, 38:1123 | Cite as

Parenting by Cell Phone: Parental Monitoring of Adolescents and Family Relations

  • Robert S. Weisskirch
Empirical Research

Abstract

Cellular phones provide a means for parents to monitor and request information about whereabouts, associates, and current activities from adolescents. Simultaneously, adolescents can communicate with parents to inform them of activities and to solicit support or they can also choose to nondisclose. The frequency, duration, and nature of calls may relate to parents’ and to adolescents’ perceptions of truthfulness and family relationships. 196 dyads (13% father–son, 11% father–daughter, 30% mother–son, and 46% mother–daughter) completed a questionnaire indicating cell phone use, their truthfulness of activities, the nature of their calls to one another, and family relationships. The parents were, on average, 45.38 years old (SD = 6.35) and were 83% Euroamerican, 9% Asian American, 3% Latino, 3% African American, 2% Mixed ethnicity, and 1% American Indian. The adolescents were, on average, 16.25 years old (SD = 1.17) and were 77% Euroamerican, 9% Asian American, 4% Latino, 3% African American, 8% Mixed ethnicity, and .5% American Indian. Correlational analyses revealed that parents who called more frequently reported less truthfulness when speaking to their adolescents via cell phone. Greater frequency in parental calls also was associated with less adolescent-reported truthfulness. From multiple regression analyses, for parents, calls when upset were associated with less parental knowledge and poorer family relations. For adolescents, the same was true; however, adolescents who made calls seeking social support and to ask and confer with parents reported greater perceived parental knowledge and better family relationships.

Keywords

Parenting Cellular phones Adolescents Parental monitoring Family relations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Seth J. Schwartz, Melina Bersamin, and Byron Zamboanga who provided feedback on earlier drafts. Partial funding for this project came from a 2005 CSU Faculty Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity Award, Mini-grant.

References

  1. Ackard, D., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Perry, C. (2006). Parent–child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319. doi: 10.2307/1131780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. K. (2002). Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. K., Maughan, S. L., & Olsen, J. A. (2005a). Patterns of parenting across adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 5–16. doi: 10.1002/cd.124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., & Olsen, J. A. (2005b). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., Fisher, D. A., & Grube, J. W. (2006). Correlates of oral sex and vaginal intercourse in early and middle adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 59–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00120.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crouter, A. C., Bumpus, M. F., Davis, K. D., & McHale, S. M. (2005). How do parents learn about adolescents’ experiences? Implications for parental knowledge and adolescent risky behavior. Child Development, 76, 869–882. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00883.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crouter, A. C., & Head, M. R. (2002). Parental monitoring and knowledge of children. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Children and parenting (Vol. 1, pp. 461–483). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Darling, N., Cumsille, P., Caldwell, L. L., & Dowdy, B. (2006). Predictors of adolescents’ disclosure to parents and perceived parental knowledge: Between- and within-person differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 667–678. doi: 10.1007/s10964-006-9058-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1021800432380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher, A. C., Steinberg, L., & Williams-Wheeler, M. (2004). Parental influences on adolescent problem behavior: Revisiting Stattin and Kerr. Child Development, 75, 781–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00706.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hudson, W. W. (1989). Index of family relations. Tempe: Walmyr.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobson, K. C., & Crockett, L. J. (2000). Parental monitoring and adolescent adjustment: An ecological perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 65–97. doi: 10.1207/SJRA1001_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasesniemi, E., & Rautiainen, P. (2001). Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 171–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366–380. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Trost, K. (1999). To know you is to trust you: Parents’ trust is rooted in child disclosure of information. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 737–752. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents’ monitoring-related knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74, 752–768. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ling, R. (2000). We will be reached”: The use of mobile telephony among Norwegian Youth. Information Technology & People, 13, 102–113. doi: 10.1108/09593840010339844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2001). Hyper-coordination via mobile phone in Norway. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marshall, S. K., Tilton-Weaver, L. C., & Bosdet, L. (2005). Information management: Considering adolescents’ regulation of parental knowledge. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masche, J. G., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2007). A general social response principle underlying parental knowledge. In M. E. Winchell (Chair), Exploring parental knowledge from mothers, fathers, and offsprings perspectives. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  22. McGee, M. K. (2008, February 11). Track this; Locating data is getting more plentiful and practical. Information Week, 36–40.Google Scholar
  23. Mott, J. A., Crowe, P. A., Richardson, J., & Flay, B. (1999). After-school supervision and adolescent cigarette smoking: Contributions of the setting and intensity of after-school self-care. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 35–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1018747602026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pettit, G. S., & Laird, R. D. (2002). Psychological control and monitoring in early adolescence: The role of parental involvement and earlier child adjustment. In B. K. Barber (Ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents (pp. 97–123). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rakow, L. F., & Navarro, V. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular telephone. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10, 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shumow, L., & Lomax, R. (2002). Parental efficacy: Predictor of parenting behavior and adolescent outcomes. Parenting, Science and Practice, 2, 127–150. doi: 10.1207/S15327922PAR0202_03.Google Scholar
  27. Smetana, J., Crean, H·F., & Campione-Barr, N. (2005). New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 31–46. doi: 10.1002/cd.126.Google Scholar
  28. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goosens, L. (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 42, 305–318. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steinberg, L., & Silk, J. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting. Children and parenting (Vol. 1, pp. 103–133). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Waizenhofer, R. N., Buchanan, C. M., & Jackson-Newsom, J. (2004). Mothers’ and fathers’ knowledge of adolescents’ daily activities: Its sources and its links with adolescent adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 348–360. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, S., & Williams, L. (2005). Space invaders: The negotiation of teenage boundaries through the mobile phone. The Sociological Review, 5, 314–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00516.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liberal Studies DepartmentCalifornia State University, Monterey BaySeasideUSA

Personalised recommendations