The current environment of high competitiveness has made innovative firms, especially job-creating ones, central to regional economic growth. Most of previous studies have not considered the interactions between internal and regional factors, and has focused on product innovation performance. This paper aims to fill both gaps in the literature on the regional determinants of firm innovation. Assuming a firm-centered approach, the main goal of the paper is to analyse whether the regional resources determine firm innovation either in a direct way or by shaping the effect of the firm’s internal resources. We used multilevel modelling and panel data methodology in a sample of 2141 Spanish manufacturing firms over the period 2008–2014. More specifically, we assume fixed slopes and estimate a three-level logistic random intercept models (observations: level 1; firms: level 2; regions: level 3). Our results show that the internal factors are the cornerstone of firm innovation. Nevertheless, there is also a ‘regional effect’ in the firms’ propensity to innovate. Particularly, the effect of the region’s resources in explaining the differences across firms in product innovation is more substantive than in process innovation. In this last case, regional factors play a subtler role by shaping the effect of its internal drivers. Policy-makers should be conscious of the need of keeping a bottom–up approach (or a firm-centered approach) when designing regional innovation policies. In this respect, policies aimed at promoting the size, export activities and R&D intensity of firms could be effective to increase the number of firms that can benefit from the exploitation of the region’s resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Eurostat uses the aggregation of the manufacturing industry according to technological intensity and based on the NACE Rev.2 at the two-digit level.
The authors thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.
Other different measures of the regional production spillovers through scientific publishing were used. In particular, we used the natural logarithm of the number of WOS (Web of Science) publications per 100 thousand inhabitants, the natural logarithm of the number of SCOPUS publications per 100 thousand inhabitants, and the natural logarithm of the number of SCOPUS publications over the number of professors at the region’s universities. These alternative measures yield similar results to those presented in Tables 5 and 6. These models are not reported for space reasons. They can be obtained from the authors if required.
The authors thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.
Those models are not reported for space reasons. They can be obtained from the authors if required.
Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics,32(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3.
Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management,27, 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy,43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.
Barbosa, N., & Eiriz, V. (2009). Linking corporate productivity to foreign direct investment: An empirical assessment. International Business Review,18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.10.003.
Batsakis, G. (2012). R&D subsidiaries’ innovative performance “revisited”: A multilevel approach. In DRUID Conference, june 19–21, CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation,26(5–6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016.
Bellmann L., Crimmann A., Evers K. & Hujer R. (2013). Regional determinants of establishments’ innovation activities: A multi-level approach. Working paper, IZA discussion papers, No 7572, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.
Bergman, E. M., & Jeser, E. J. (1999). Industrial and regional clusters: Concepts and comparative applications. Morgantown: The Web Book of Regional Science, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). The regional environment and a firm’s innovative performance. A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography,83(2), 181–199.
Chen, Y. S., Chang, K. C., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Nonlinear influence on R&D project performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,79, 1537–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.007.
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy,45(2), 387–400.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35, 128–152.
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change,10, 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945.
Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2016). Improving innovation in university spin-offs: The fostering role of university and region. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000200002.
COTEC. (2017). Informe COTEC. Madrid: Fundación COTEC para la innovación tecnológica.
Czarnitzki, D., & Hottenrott, H. (2009). Are local milieus the key to innovation performance? Journal of Regional Science,49, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00584.x.
D’Agostino, L. M., & Moreno, R. (2019). Green regions and local firms’ innovation. Papers in Regional Science,98(4), 1585–1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12427.
Di Cintio, M., Ghosh, S., & Grassia, E. (2017). Firm growth, R&D expenditures and exports: An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. Research Policy,46(4), 836–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.006.
Du, J. & Temouri, Y. (2011). Internationalisation and high growth firms: The OECD experience. In International conference on information management, technical management and intelligent technology (ICITI). 26–28 March 2011, Hong Kong.
European Commission (Ed.). (2014). Investment for jobs and growth. Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EUROSTAT. (2018). Community innovation survey. Science and technology, enterprises by main types of innovation, NACE Rev. 2 activity and size class. Retrieved June 16, 2020 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/inn_cis9_type.
Feldman, M. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review,43, 409–429.
Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures,27(5), 527–536.
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy,35, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001.
Forero-Pineda, C., Corredor, S. & Forero, N. (2010). Business networks and innovation in SMEs and large firms of a developing country. In The 5th IEEE international conference on management of innovation and technology, June 2010, Singapore.
Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. The Journal of Political Economy,100, 1126–1152.
Hausman, A. (2005). Innovativeness among small businesses: Theory and propositions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management,34, 773–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.12.009.
INE. (2014). Encuesta de Población Activa (EPA). Cuarto trimestre 2014. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy,33, 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004.
Leckie, G. (2013). Module 11: Three-level multilevel models: concepts, LEMMA (Learning environment for multilevel methodology and applications), centre for multilevel modelling, University of Bristol. Available in: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course./ Accessed March 2019.
Lee, N., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Innovation in creative cities: Evidence from British small firms. Industry and Innovation,21(6), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.983748.
López-Bazo, E., & Motellón, E. (2018). Innovation, heterogeneous firms and the region: Evidence from Spain. Regional Studies,52(5), 673–687.
Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2001). Location and network effects on innovation success: Evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants. Research Policy,30, 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00098-6.
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2006). SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs. Profitability. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,4(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-006-8000-7.
Maillat, D. (1995). Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, An International Journal,7(2), 157–165.
Markusen, A. (1996). Interaction between regional and industrial policies: Evidence from four countries. International Regional Science Review,19, 49–77.
Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics,24(2–3), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1086.
Naz, A., Niebuhr, A., & Peters, J. C. (2015). What’s behind the disparities in firm innovation rates across regions? Evidence on composition and context effects. Annals of Regional Science,55(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0694-9.
Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2011). Collaborative business process management: Status quo and quo vadis. Business Process Management Journal,17(3), 384–402.
OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). Paris, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
Pinch, S., Henry, N., Jenkins, M., & Tallman, S. (2003). From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters’: A model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations. Journal of Economic Geography,3, 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbg019.
Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review,11(12), 77–90.
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Texas: Stata Press.
Raspe, O., & Van Oort, F. (2008). Firm growth and localized knowledge externalities. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy,38(2), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.132349.
Raspe, O. & Van Oort, F. (2009). Localized knowledge externalities and firms: an intrinsic multilevel issue. In FIRB-RISC Conference Research and entrepreneurship in the knowledge-based economy. Milan, Italy: KITeS-Cespri, Bocconi University
Rodríguez-Gulías, M. J., Fernández-López, S., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2018). The role of knowledge spillovers on the University Spin-Offs innovation. Science and Public Policy,45(6), 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy018.
Rodríguez-Gulías, M. J., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., & Fernández-López, S. (2016). The regional effect on the innovative performance of university spin-offs: A multilevel approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,7(4), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0287-y.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies,37, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Srholec, M. (2010). A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Regional Studies,44, 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365094.
Steele, F. (2009), Module 7: Multilevel models for binary responses: concepts. LEMMA (learning environment for multilevel methodology and applications), centre for multilevel modelling, University of Bristol. Available in: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/ Accessed March 2019.
Sternberg, R., & Arndt, O. (2001). The firm or the region: What determines the innovation behavior of European firms? Economic Geography,77, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594106.
Teixeira, A. A. C., & Correia, S. F. (2020). Determinants of the economic performance of portuguese family firms: Is Innovation Relevant? In J. Saiz-Álvarez, J. Leitão, & J. Palma-Ruiz (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and family business vitality. Studies on entrepreneurship, structural change and industrial dynamics (pp. 297–326). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15526-1_15.
Tojeiro-Rivero, D. & Moreno, R. (2019). Technological cooperation and R&D outsourcing at the firm level: The role of the regional context. Working paper, research institute of applied economics, IREA working paper 2019/04, Barcelona.
Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-De-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy,37, 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.001.
Veugelers, R. & Cincera, M. (2010), Europe’s missing yollies. Bruegel Policy Brief 2010/06, August 2010.
Wang, C. C., & Lin, G. C. (2013). Dynamics of innovation in a globalizing china: Regional environment, inter-firm relations and firm attributes. Journal of Economic Geography,13(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs019.
Zuluaga, JC (2012). The influence of regional knowledge spillovers on the innovative performance of firms. A multilevel approach. In Globelics academy, 8th Ph.D. School on Innovation and Economic Development, Brazil.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodríguez-Gulías, M.J., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., Fernández-López, S. et al. The effect of regional resources on innovation: a firm-centered approach. J Technol Transf (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09811-8
- External resources
- Regional resources
- Product innovation
- Process innovation
- Absorptive capacity
- Interaction effects