Advertisement

Integrating professional and academic knowledge: the link between researchers skills and innovation culture

  • Dirk Meissner
  • Natalia Shmatko
Article

Abstract

Approaches to innovation have been thoroughly studied in the last decades. It’s well understood that an organizations’ culture is among the crucial factors for success and renewal of organizations. Yet culture is made by people and their attitudes. Innovation culture requires skills and competence by employees which are presumably beyond the traditional basic knowledge taught at undergraduate, graduate and post graduate level. This is even more evident for university graduates who’re mainly finding professional careers in the private sector who has special requirements to employees. Graduates’ skills are strongly influenced by curricula and the cultural values and norms outside curricula transferred by universities to students. But frequently these skills are designed by universities without profound knowledge of the actual skills required. At the same time organizations acting as potential graduates employers value researcher skills and competencies differently from how these are perceived. The paper suggests that understanding the professional and universal skills of researchers perceived and needed is one element of innovation culture. Thereby the skills in discussion go beyond purely academic skills only; instead it is proposed that skills which increase the absorptive capacity of companies are crucial for implementing effective productive innovation management.

Keywords

Researcher skills Third mission Education modernisation agenda Research professionals Innovator Innovation culture Open innovation Active innovation 

JEL Classification

O15 O33 O39 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of the subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.

References

  1. Adegbile, A., & Sarpong, D. (2015). Managerial engagement with scenario planning: A conceptual consumption approach. Foresight and STI Governance, 9(4), 73–80.Google Scholar
  2. Adomavičiūtė, D. (2015). University’s role and influence for professional development in public administration area. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0360-1.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibald, R. D. (2003). Managing high technology programs and projects. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Batra, S. (2009). Strengthening human capital for knowledge economy needs: An Indian perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(5), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2016). Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: A framework from critical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1195–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, A. (2015). Developing career adaptability and innovative capabilities through learning and working in Norway and the United Kingdom. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butcher, D., Harvey, P., & Atkinson, S. (1997). Developing business through develooing individuals. Research Paper, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  9. Caena, F. (2011). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Carayannis, E., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2016). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): Concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9433-8.Google Scholar
  11. Cervantes, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Commercialising public research under the open innovation model: New trends. Foresight and STI Governance, 8(3), 70–81.Google Scholar
  12. Coates, D. (2006). People skills training: Are you getting a return on your investment? Performance Support Systems, Inc. http://www.praxisconsulting.org/PeopleSkills.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  13. Cobb, S. L., & Barker, T. S. (1992). A model of cross-cultural training in the transfer of technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 17(4), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collings, D., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick, R. D. (2008). Key competencies for education in a european context: Narratives of accountability or care. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Grande, H., De Boyser, K., Vandevelde, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2014). From academia to industry: Are doctorate holders ready? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 538–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113–127.Google Scholar
  18. Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M. R., & Maggioni, V. (2013). Collective knowledge and organizational routines within academic communities of practice: An empirical research on science-entrepreneurs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gackstatter, S., Kotzemir, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Building an innovation-driven economy—The case of BRIC and GCC countries. Foresight, 16(4), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gokhberg, L., & Meissner, D. (2016). Seizing future opportunities for national STI development. In L. Gokhberg, D. Meissner, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Deploying foresight for policy and strategy makers: Creating opportunities through public policies and corporate strategies in science, technology and innovation (pp. 267–273). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D., & Sokolov, A. (2016). Foresight: Turning challenges into opportunities. In L. Gokhberg, D. Meissner, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Deploying foresight for policy and strategy makers: Creating opportunities through public policies and corporate strategies in science, technology and innovation (pp. 1–8). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Makingsense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heery, E., & Noon, M. (2008). A dictionary of human resource management (2 Rev. Ed.). Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199298761.001.0001/acref-9780199298761-e-1638. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.
  24. Holtskog, H. (2015). Defining the characteristics of an expert in a social context through subjective evaluation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0312-1.Google Scholar
  25. Jefferson, D. J., Maida, M., Farkas, A., Alandete-Saez, M., & Bennett, A. B. (2017). Technology transfer in the Americas: Common and divergent practices among major research universities and public sector institutions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1307–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johns, G. (2010). Some unintended consequences of job design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiessling, T., & Harvey, M. (2006). The human resource management issues during an acquisition: The target firms top management team and key managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1307–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, G. A., & Crandall, B. (1991). Finding and using technology-specific expertise. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 16(1), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krasnopolskaya, I., & Mersiyanova, I. (2014). Civil society as an environment for production and diffusion of social innovation. Foresight-Russia, 8(4), 40–53.Google Scholar
  30. Lam, A. (2007). Knowledge networks and careers: Academic scientists in industry–university links. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 993–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, R., & Heckman, R. J. (2006). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markus, M. L. (2001). Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDowell, E., & Baney, L. (1983). A survey of communication skills needed and communication methods used in the dissemination of development information. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 8(1), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meissner, D., & Shmatko, N. A. (2016). “Keep open”: The potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new knowledge triangle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.012.Google Scholar
  35. Moog, P., Werner, A., Houweling, S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). The impact of skills, working time allocation and peer effects on the entrepreneurial intentions of scientists. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of professional competence. In International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 107–137). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Nielson Group. (2017). List of soft skills competencies with description. The Nielson Group. http://www.nielsongroup.com/articles/list_of_competencies.pdf. Accessed 03 Jan 2018.
  38. OECD. (2016). “Skills for a digital world”, policy brief on the future of work. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  39. Oğuz, F., & Şengün, A. E. (2011). Mystery of the unknown: Revisiting tacit knowledge in the organizational literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2004). Knowledge flow transfers in multinational corporations: Knowledge properties and implications for management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selamat, M. H., & Choudrie, J. (2004). The diffusion of tacit knowledge and its implications on information systems: The role of meta-abilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharkie, R. (2003). Knowledge creation and its place in the development of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shmatko, N. (2012). Competences of engineers evidence from a comparative study for Russia and EU countries. Foresight-Russia, 6(4), 32–47. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  46. Smith, A. D., & Rupp, W. T. (2002). Communication and loyalty among knowledge workers: A resource of the firm theory view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Svare, H. (2016). User-producer dialogue, workplace innovation, and knowledge in a regional innovation system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7, 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Toner, P. (2011a). Workforce skills and innovation: An overview of major themes in the literature (p. 2011). Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry (STI).Google Scholar
  49. Toner, P. (2011). Workforce skills and innovation: An overview of major themes in the literature (Vol. 55, p. 0_1). OECD Education Working Papers.Google Scholar
  50. Whelan, E., & Carcary, M. (2011). Integrating talent and knowledge management: Where are the benefits? Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woods, J. G. (2015). The effect of technological change on the task structure of jobs and the capital-labor trade-off in US production. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0275-2.Google Scholar
  52. Woolston, C. (2016). Open for business. Nature, 537, 437–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations