Science and Technology Parks: a study of value creation for park tenants
The literature on Science and Technology Parks (STPs) is growing rapidly and, despite the positive impact of STPs on firms found by many studies, it remains unclear how STPs create value for tenants. In this paper, we study the STP supply side through a case study in a Swedish region. We identify two components of the business support provided by parks: a configuration-oriented component, and a process-oriented component. The former refers to the static design of the business support, and the latter to the active, hands-on support provided by parks’ management. Both components must be planned carefully in order to deliver value to tenants. We also discuss some implications for policy and managers.
KeywordsScience and Technology Parks Agglomerations Added-value Entrepreneurship Innovation
JEL ClassificationO3 R1
The authors want to thank all the interviewees, especially Sten Gunnar Johansson, Åke Rolf and Christian Berger for their precious time. A previous version of this paper has been presented to the Triple Helix IX International Conference at Stanford University in 2011. The authors thank the participants to the conference for their useful comments. Alberto Albahari wants to acknowledge funding from the University of Malaga for carrying out the research staying in Sweden and for attending the conference.
Funding was provided by Universidad de Málaga (Grant No. C.3.; A.1. III Plan Propio de Investigación de la Universidad de Málaga).
- Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2010). Science and Technology Parks impacts on tenant organisations: A review of literature. MPRA Paper No. 41914. University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- ALMI. (2013). ALMI AB. Available at http://www.almi.se. Accessed 10 June 2013.
- Autio, E., & Klofsten, M. (1998). A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 30–43.Google Scholar
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
- Innovationsbron. (2011). Available at http://www.innovationsbron.se/en. Accessed 10 June 2011.
- Johansson, S. G. (2009). New challanges meet old experience—Networking as astrategic tool. Working paper 2009-08-20/MSP. Linköping: Mjärdevi Science Park.Google Scholar
- Jones-Evans, D. (2007). Entrepreneurship environment and policies: Exploiting the science and technology base in the region of Halle. OECD LEED local entrepreneurship series. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2001). Does venture capital spur innovation? In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), Entrepreneurial inputs and outcomes: New studies of entrepreneurship in the United States (pp. 1–44). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- LEAD. (2017). LiU entrepreneurship and development. Available at http://www.lead.se/en. Accessed 14 December 2017.
- Monck, C. S. P., Porter, R. B., Quintas, P., Storey, D., & Wynarczyk, P. (1988). Science parks and the growth of high-technology firms. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- NULINK. (2013). Available at http://www.nulink.se. Accessed 10 June 2013.
- VINNOVA. (2018). Swedish governmental agency for innovation systems. Available at http://www.vinnova.se/en. Accessed 1 February 2018.
- WAINOVA. (2009). Wainova Atlas of innovation: Science/technology/research parks and business incubators in the world. Cheshire: Ten Alps Publishing.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). London: Sage.Google Scholar