Have you been served? The impact of university entrepreneurial support on start-ups’ network formation
University-based entrepreneurial support organizations devote increasing efforts to create a context and opportunities for interaction among start-up firms. The basic assumption behind these efforts is that networks facilitate access to knowledge and resources and increase the chances of success for start-ups. However, the mechanisms that facilitate the creation of business ties with other members of the same community are yet to be identified and empirically tested. This paper leverages the social network and firm incubator literatures to hypothesize and test mechanisms that create the context and opportunity for business interaction among member firms within one university-based entrepreneurial support organization. The study uses the empirical setting of a large, university based support organization and the sample includes firms with different levels of membership-support. This empirical context allows us to compare different levels of membership-support and identify the dimensions that have greater impacts on a firm’s opportunity to establish ties with other members. The results reveal that geographical proximity, ad-hoc service support including shared space, and a larger community of member and graduate firms to which network ties may be formed increases the chance of connecting with other past or current member firms.
KeywordsEntrepreneurial support organizations University Networks
JEL ClassificationC30 I22 I23 O3 O51
- Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165–198.Google Scholar
- Aldrich, H, Rosen, B., & Woodward, W. (1987). The Impact of social networks on business founding and profit: A longitudinal study. In Babson entrepreneurship conference. Malibu, CA: Pepperdine University.Google Scholar
- Aldrich, H., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton, & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carayannis, E. G., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (global local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: Lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gurmu, S., & Trivedi, P. K. (1996). Excess zeros in count models for recreational trips. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(4), 469–477.Google Scholar
- Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators: Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78, 74–84.Google Scholar
- Homan, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
- Hughley, I. (2013) Personal communication.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. A., Harper-Anderson, E., & Molnar, L. A. (2011). Incubating success: Incubation best practices that lead to successful new ventures. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Research on Labor Employment, and the Economy. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Lyons, T. (2000). Birthing economic development: How effective are Michigan’s business incubators?. East Lansing, MI: Social Science Research Bureau, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
- Moriset, B. (2014). Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd geography of innovation, international conference. Utrecht (The Netherlands): Utrecht University.Google Scholar
- Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither markets nor hirerchey: Network forms of organization. Research on Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). New York, NY: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Toon, J. (2013). Georgia Tech’s VentureLab ranks second among university-based incubators worldwide. Research News: Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.news.gatech.edu/2013/07/15/georgia-tech%E2%80%99s-venturelab-ranks-second-among-university-based-incubators-worldwide.
- Tornatzky, L. G., & Rideout, E. C. (2014). Innovation 2.0: Reinventing university roles in a knowledge economy. http://www.innovation-u.com/.
- VentureLab. (2013). Georgia Tech VentureLab. http://venturelab.gatech.edu/.